Short-term outcomes after heart transplantation using donor hearts preserved with ex vivo perfusion.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1080/14017431.2023.2267804
William Herrik Nielsen, Finn Gustafsson, Peter Skov Olsen, Peter Bo Hansen, Kasper Rossing, Nikolaj Bang Lilleør, Peter Hasse Møller-Sørensen, Christian Holdflod Møller
{"title":"Short-term outcomes after heart transplantation using donor hearts preserved with ex vivo perfusion.","authors":"William Herrik Nielsen,&nbsp;Finn Gustafsson,&nbsp;Peter Skov Olsen,&nbsp;Peter Bo Hansen,&nbsp;Kasper Rossing,&nbsp;Nikolaj Bang Lilleør,&nbsp;Peter Hasse Møller-Sørensen,&nbsp;Christian Holdflod Møller","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2023.2267804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard Conventional Cold Storage (CCS) during heart transplantation procurement is associated with time-dependent ischemic injury to the graft, which is a significant independent risk factor for post-transplant early morbidity and mortality - especially when cold ischemic time exceeds four hours. Since 2018, Rigshospitalet (Copenhagen, Denmark) has been utilising <i>ex vivo</i> perfusion (Organ Care System, OCS) in selected cases. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of patients transplanted with OCS compared to CCS. <i>Methods</i>: This retrospective single-centre study was based on consecutive patients undergoing a heart transplant between January 2018 and April 2021. Patients were selected for the OCS group when the cold ischemic time was expected to exceed four hours. The primary outcome measure was six-month event-free survival. <i>Results</i>: In total, 48 patients were included in the study; nine were transplanted with an OCS heart. The two groups had no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Six-month event-free survival was 77.8% [95% CI: 54.9-100%] in the OCS group and 79.5% [95% CI: 67.8-93.2%] in the CCS group (<i>p</i> = 0.91). While the OCS group had a median out-of-body time that was 183 min longer (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), the cold ischemic time was reduced by 51 min (<i>p</i> = 0.007). <i>Conclusion:</i> In a Scandinavian setting, our data confirms that utilising OCS in heart procurement allows for a longer out-of-body time and a reduced cold ischemic time without negatively affecting safety or early post-transplant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21383,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2023.2267804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard Conventional Cold Storage (CCS) during heart transplantation procurement is associated with time-dependent ischemic injury to the graft, which is a significant independent risk factor for post-transplant early morbidity and mortality - especially when cold ischemic time exceeds four hours. Since 2018, Rigshospitalet (Copenhagen, Denmark) has been utilising ex vivo perfusion (Organ Care System, OCS) in selected cases. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of patients transplanted with OCS compared to CCS. Methods: This retrospective single-centre study was based on consecutive patients undergoing a heart transplant between January 2018 and April 2021. Patients were selected for the OCS group when the cold ischemic time was expected to exceed four hours. The primary outcome measure was six-month event-free survival. Results: In total, 48 patients were included in the study; nine were transplanted with an OCS heart. The two groups had no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Six-month event-free survival was 77.8% [95% CI: 54.9-100%] in the OCS group and 79.5% [95% CI: 67.8-93.2%] in the CCS group (p = 0.91). While the OCS group had a median out-of-body time that was 183 min longer (p < 0.0001), the cold ischemic time was reduced by 51 min (p = 0.007). Conclusion: In a Scandinavian setting, our data confirms that utilising OCS in heart procurement allows for a longer out-of-body time and a reduced cold ischemic time without negatively affecting safety or early post-transplant outcomes.

使用体外灌注保存的供体心脏进行心脏移植后的短期结果。
心脏移植采购过程中的标准常规冷藏(CCS)与移植物的时间依赖性缺血性损伤有关,这是移植后早期发病率和死亡率的一个重要独立风险因素,尤其是当冷缺血时间超过4小时时。自2018年以来,Rigshospitalet(丹麦哥本哈根)一直在选定的病例中使用离体灌注(器官护理系统,OCS)。本研究的目的是比较OCS与CCS移植患者的短期临床结果。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究基于2018年1月至2021年4月期间接受心脏移植的连续患者。当冷缺血时间预计超过4小时时,选择患者作为OCS组。主要的结果指标是六个月无事件生存率。结果:本研究共纳入48例患者;其中9例移植了OCS心脏。两组在基线特征上没有显著差异。OCS组的6个月无事件生存率为77.8%[95%CI:54.9-100%],CCS组为79.5%[95%CI:67.8-93.2%](p = 0.91)。而OCS组的平均离体时间为183 分钟更长(p p = 0.007)。结论:在斯堪的纳维亚环境中,我们的数据证实,在心脏采购中使用OCS可以延长离体时间,减少冷缺血时间,而不会对安全性或移植后早期结果产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal is to promote cardiovascular research that crosses the borders between disciplines. The journal is a forum for the entire field of cardiovascular research, basic and clinical including: • Cardiology - Interventional and non-invasive • Cardiovascular epidemiology • Cardiovascular anaesthesia and intensive care • Cardiovascular surgery • Cardiovascular radiology • Clinical physiology • Transplantation of thoracic organs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信