[Revascularisation of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis - Reasonable or Obsolete?]

Q4 Medicine
Praxis Pub Date : 2023-09-01
Benedikt Reutersberg, Thomas Stadlbauer, Philip Düppers, Lorenz Meuli, Alexander Zimmermann
{"title":"[Revascularisation of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis - Reasonable or Obsolete?]","authors":"Benedikt Reutersberg,&nbsp;Thomas Stadlbauer,&nbsp;Philip Düppers,&nbsp;Lorenz Meuli,&nbsp;Alexander Zimmermann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recommendations for surgical versus conservative treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are based on prospective randomized trials, some of which were performed several decades ago. However, during this time, \"best medical treatment\" (BMT) for conservative therapy of arteriosclerotic patients has evolved significantly. Because of the associated risk reduction of ACS, surgical therapy is increasingly being questioned. By identifying clinical and morphological risk parameters, subgroups could be identified that might, however, benefit from invasive therapy. Consequently, multidisciplinary therapy decision-making requires an increasingly patient-individualized approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20494,"journal":{"name":"Praxis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recommendations for surgical versus conservative treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are based on prospective randomized trials, some of which were performed several decades ago. However, during this time, "best medical treatment" (BMT) for conservative therapy of arteriosclerotic patients has evolved significantly. Because of the associated risk reduction of ACS, surgical therapy is increasingly being questioned. By identifying clinical and morphological risk parameters, subgroups could be identified that might, however, benefit from invasive therapy. Consequently, multidisciplinary therapy decision-making requires an increasingly patient-individualized approach.

[无症状颈动脉狭窄的再治疗-合理还是过时?]
引言:手术治疗与保守治疗无症状颈动脉狭窄(ACS)的建议基于前瞻性随机试验,其中一些试验是几十年前进行的。然而,在这段时间里,动脉硬化患者保守治疗的“最佳药物治疗”(BMT)有了显著的发展。由于ACS的相关风险降低,外科治疗越来越受到质疑。通过确定临床和形态学风险参数,可以确定可能受益于侵入性治疗的亚组。因此,多学科治疗决策需要越来越多的患者个性化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Praxis
Praxis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信