Development of an Asthma Exacerbation Risk Prediction Model for Conversational Use by Adults in England.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2023-10-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S424098
Constantinos Kallis, Rafael A Calvo, Bjorn Schuller, Jennifer K Quint
{"title":"Development of an Asthma Exacerbation Risk Prediction Model for Conversational Use by Adults in England.","authors":"Constantinos Kallis,&nbsp;Rafael A Calvo,&nbsp;Bjorn Schuller,&nbsp;Jennifer K Quint","doi":"10.2147/POR.S424098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving accurate risk assessment of asthma exacerbations, and reduction via relevant behaviour change among people with asthma could save lives and reduce health care costs. We developed a simple personalised risk prediction model for asthma exacerbations using factors collected in routine healthcare data for use in a risk modelling feature for automated conversational systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used pseudonymised primary care electronic healthcare records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database in England. We combined variables for prediction of asthma exacerbations using logistic regression including age, gender, ethnicity, Index of Multiple Deprivation, geographical region and clinical variables related to asthma events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1,203,741 patients divided into three cohorts to implement temporal validation: 898,763 (74.7%) in the training sample, 226,754 (18.8%) in the testing sample and 78,224 (6.5%) in the validation sample. The Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the full model was 0.72 and for the restricted model was 0.71. Using a cut-off point of 0.1, approximately 27 asthma reviews by clinicians per 100 patients would be prevented compared with a strategy that all patients are regarded as high risk. Compared with patients without an exacerbation, patients who exacerbated were older, more likely to be female, prescribed more SABA and ICS in the preceding 12 months, have history of GORD, COPD, anxiety, depression, live in very deprived areas and have more severe disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using information available from routinely collected electronic healthcare record data, we developed a model that has moderate ability to separate patients who had an asthma exacerbation within 3 months from their index date from patients who did not. When comparing this model with a simplified model with variables that can easily be self-reported through a WhatsApp chatbot, we have shown that the predictive performance of the model is not substantially different.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"111-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S424098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving accurate risk assessment of asthma exacerbations, and reduction via relevant behaviour change among people with asthma could save lives and reduce health care costs. We developed a simple personalised risk prediction model for asthma exacerbations using factors collected in routine healthcare data for use in a risk modelling feature for automated conversational systems.

Methods: We used pseudonymised primary care electronic healthcare records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database in England. We combined variables for prediction of asthma exacerbations using logistic regression including age, gender, ethnicity, Index of Multiple Deprivation, geographical region and clinical variables related to asthma events.

Results: We included 1,203,741 patients divided into three cohorts to implement temporal validation: 898,763 (74.7%) in the training sample, 226,754 (18.8%) in the testing sample and 78,224 (6.5%) in the validation sample. The Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the full model was 0.72 and for the restricted model was 0.71. Using a cut-off point of 0.1, approximately 27 asthma reviews by clinicians per 100 patients would be prevented compared with a strategy that all patients are regarded as high risk. Compared with patients without an exacerbation, patients who exacerbated were older, more likely to be female, prescribed more SABA and ICS in the preceding 12 months, have history of GORD, COPD, anxiety, depression, live in very deprived areas and have more severe disease.

Conclusion: Using information available from routinely collected electronic healthcare record data, we developed a model that has moderate ability to separate patients who had an asthma exacerbation within 3 months from their index date from patients who did not. When comparing this model with a simplified model with variables that can easily be self-reported through a WhatsApp chatbot, we have shown that the predictive performance of the model is not substantially different.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

英国成年人会话使用哮喘加重风险预测模型的开发。
背景:提高对哮喘恶化的准确风险评估,并通过改变哮喘患者的相关行为来减少哮喘发作,可以挽救生命并降低医疗保健成本。我们利用常规医疗保健数据中收集的因素,开发了一个简单的哮喘恶化个性化风险预测模型,用于自动对话系统的风险建模功能。方法:我们使用了来自英国临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)Aurum数据库的假名初级保健电子医疗记录。我们使用逻辑回归组合了预测哮喘恶化的变量,包括年龄、性别、种族、多重剥夺指数、地理区域和与哮喘事件相关的临床变量。结果:我们纳入了1203741名患者,分为三组进行时间验证:898763名(74.7%)在训练样本中,226754名(18.8%)在测试样本中,78224名(6.5%)在验证样本中。完整模型的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.72,限制性模型为0.71。使用0.1的临界点,与所有患者都被视为高风险的策略相比,临床医生每100名患者中大约有27名哮喘患者可以得到预防。与没有恶化的患者相比,恶化的患者年龄较大,更有可能是女性,在过去12个月内服用了更多的SABA和ICS,有GORD、COPD、焦虑、抑郁病史,生活在非常贫困的地区,疾病更严重。结论:利用常规收集的电子医疗记录数据中的可用信息,我们开发了一个模型,该模型具有中等能力,可以将自指数日期起3个月内哮喘发作的患者与未发作的患者区分开来。当将该模型与具有可以通过WhatsApp聊天机器人轻松自我报告的变量的简化模型进行比较时,我们已经表明该模型的预测性能没有实质性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信