Deep geometric learning for intracranial aneurysm detection: towards expert rater performance.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Žiga Bizjak, June Ho Choi, Wonhyoung Park, Franjo Pernuš, Žiga Špiclin
{"title":"Deep geometric learning for intracranial aneurysm detection: towards expert rater performance.","authors":"Žiga Bizjak, June Ho Choi, Wonhyoung Park, Franjo Pernuš, Žiga Špiclin","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2023-020905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is crucial for patient outcomes. Typically identified on angiographic scans such as CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography (MRA), the sensitivity of experts in studies on small IAs (diameter <3 mm) was moderate (64-74.1% for CTAs and 70-92.8% for MRAs), and these figures could be lower in a routine clinical setting. Recent research shows that the expert level of sensitivity might be achieved using deep learning approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large multisite dataset including 1054 MRA and 2174 CTA scans with expert IA annotations was collected. A novel modality-agnostic two-step IA detection approach was proposed. The first step used nnU-Net for segmenting vascular structures, with model training performed separately for each modality. In the second step, segmentations were converted to vascular surface that was parcellated by sampling point clouds and, using a PointNet++ model, each point was labeled as an aneurysm or vessel class.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative validation of the test data from different sites than the training data showed that the proposed approach achieved pooled sensitivity of 85% and 90% on 157 MRA scans and 1338 CTA scans, respectively, while the sensitivity for small IAs was 72% and 83%, respectively. The corresponding number of false findings per image was low at 1.54 and 1.57, and 0.4 and 0.83 on healthy subject data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed approach achieved a state-of-the-art balance between the sensitivity and the number of false findings, matched the expert-level sensitivity to small (and other) IAs on external data, and therefore seems fit for computer-assisted detection of IAs in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1157-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is crucial for patient outcomes. Typically identified on angiographic scans such as CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography (MRA), the sensitivity of experts in studies on small IAs (diameter <3 mm) was moderate (64-74.1% for CTAs and 70-92.8% for MRAs), and these figures could be lower in a routine clinical setting. Recent research shows that the expert level of sensitivity might be achieved using deep learning approaches.

Methods: A large multisite dataset including 1054 MRA and 2174 CTA scans with expert IA annotations was collected. A novel modality-agnostic two-step IA detection approach was proposed. The first step used nnU-Net for segmenting vascular structures, with model training performed separately for each modality. In the second step, segmentations were converted to vascular surface that was parcellated by sampling point clouds and, using a PointNet++ model, each point was labeled as an aneurysm or vessel class.

Results: Quantitative validation of the test data from different sites than the training data showed that the proposed approach achieved pooled sensitivity of 85% and 90% on 157 MRA scans and 1338 CTA scans, respectively, while the sensitivity for small IAs was 72% and 83%, respectively. The corresponding number of false findings per image was low at 1.54 and 1.57, and 0.4 and 0.83 on healthy subject data.

Conclusions: The proposed approach achieved a state-of-the-art balance between the sensitivity and the number of false findings, matched the expert-level sensitivity to small (and other) IAs on external data, and therefore seems fit for computer-assisted detection of IAs in a clinical setting.

用于颅内动脉瘤检测的深度几何学习:迈向专家评分器性能。
背景:早期发现颅内动脉瘤对患者的预后至关重要。通常在诸如CT血管造影(CTA)或MR血管造影(MRA)的血管造影扫描上识别,专家对小型IAs研究的敏感性(直径方法:收集了一个包括1054个MRA和2174个CTA扫描以及专家IA注释的大型多站点数据集。提出了一种新的模态不可知的两步IA检测方法。第一步使用nnU-Net对血管结构进行分割,对每个模态分别进行模型训练通过采样点云进行弧形划分,并使用PointNet++模型,将每个点标记为动脉瘤或血管类别。结果:与训练数据相比,来自不同地点的测试数据的定量验证表明,所提出的方法在157次MRA扫描和1338次CTA扫描中分别实现了85%和90%的合并灵敏度,而对小IAs的灵敏度分别为72%和83%。在健康受试者数据中,每张图像的相应错误发现数量较低,分别为1.54和1.57,以及0.4和0.83。结论:所提出的方法在灵敏度和假发现数量之间实现了最先进的平衡,与外部数据中的小(和其他)IAs的专家级灵敏度相匹配,因此似乎适合在临床环境中进行计算机辅助检测IAs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信