Novel treatment based on acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial in women veterans.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1037/ccp0000836
Jennifer L Martin, Gwendolyn C Carlson, Monica R Kelly, Yeonsu Song, Michael N Mitchell, Karen R Josephson, Sarah Kate McGowan, Najwa C Culver, Morgan A Kay, Alexander J Erickson, Katie S Saldana, Kimiko J May, Lavinia Fiorentino, Cathy A Alessi, Donna L Washington, Elizabeth M Yano
{"title":"Novel treatment based on acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial in women veterans.","authors":"Jennifer L Martin, Gwendolyn C Carlson, Monica R Kelly, Yeonsu Song, Michael N Mitchell, Karen R Josephson, Sarah Kate McGowan, Najwa C Culver, Morgan A Kay, Alexander J Erickson, Katie S Saldana, Kimiko J May, Lavinia Fiorentino, Cathy A Alessi, Donna L Washington, Elizabeth M Yano","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized comparative effectiveness trial evaluated a novel insomnia treatment using acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) among women veterans. Participants received either the acceptance and the behavioral changes to treat insomnia (ABC-I) or cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). The primary objectives were to determine whether ABC-I was noninferior to CBT-I in improving sleep and to test whether ABC-I resulted in higher treatment completion and adherence versus CBT-I.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred forty-nine women veterans with insomnia disorder (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 48.0 years) received ABC-I or CBT-I. The main sleep outcomes were Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and sleep efficiency (SE) by actigraphy (objective) and sleep diary (subjective). Measures were collected at baseline, immediate posttreatment, and 3-month posttreatment follow-up. Treatment completion and adherence were assessed during the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions improved all sleep outcomes from baseline to immediate posttreatment and 3-month posttreatment follow-up. At immediate posttreatment, ABC-I was statically noninferior for sleep diary SE and objective SE, but noninferiority was not statistically confirmed for ISI or PSQI total scores. At 3-month posttreatment follow-up, ABC-I was noninferior for all four of the key outcome variables. There was not a statistically significant difference between the number of participants who discontinued CBT-I (11%) versus ABC-I (18%; <i>p</i> = .248) before completing treatment. ABC-I was superior to CBT-I for some adherence metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, ABC-I was similar in effectiveness compared to CBT-I for the treatment of insomnia and may improve adherence to some behavioral elements of treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"91 11","pages":"626-639"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000836","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This randomized comparative effectiveness trial evaluated a novel insomnia treatment using acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) among women veterans. Participants received either the acceptance and the behavioral changes to treat insomnia (ABC-I) or cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). The primary objectives were to determine whether ABC-I was noninferior to CBT-I in improving sleep and to test whether ABC-I resulted in higher treatment completion and adherence versus CBT-I.

Method: One hundred forty-nine women veterans with insomnia disorder (Mage = 48.0 years) received ABC-I or CBT-I. The main sleep outcomes were Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and sleep efficiency (SE) by actigraphy (objective) and sleep diary (subjective). Measures were collected at baseline, immediate posttreatment, and 3-month posttreatment follow-up. Treatment completion and adherence were assessed during the interventions.

Results: Both interventions improved all sleep outcomes from baseline to immediate posttreatment and 3-month posttreatment follow-up. At immediate posttreatment, ABC-I was statically noninferior for sleep diary SE and objective SE, but noninferiority was not statistically confirmed for ISI or PSQI total scores. At 3-month posttreatment follow-up, ABC-I was noninferior for all four of the key outcome variables. There was not a statistically significant difference between the number of participants who discontinued CBT-I (11%) versus ABC-I (18%; p = .248) before completing treatment. ABC-I was superior to CBT-I for some adherence metrics.

Conclusions: Overall, ABC-I was similar in effectiveness compared to CBT-I for the treatment of insomnia and may improve adherence to some behavioral elements of treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

基于接受和承诺疗法与认知行为疗法治疗失眠的新疗法:一项针对女性退伍军人的随机比较有效性试验。
目的:这项随机比较有效性试验评估了一种在女性退伍军人中使用接受和承诺疗法(ACT)的新型失眠治疗方法。参与者接受了治疗失眠的接受和行为改变(ABC-I)或失眠的认知行为疗法(CBT-I)。主要目的是确定ABC-I在改善睡眠方面是否不劣于CBT-I,并测试ABC-I是否比CBT-I更高的治疗完成率和依从性。方法:149名患有失眠障碍的女性退伍军人(Mage=48.0岁)接受ABC-I或CBT-I治疗。主要的睡眠结果是失眠严重程度指数(ISI)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和活动描记术(客观)和睡眠日记(主观)的睡眠效率(SE)。在基线、治疗后立即和治疗后3个月随访时收集测量结果。在干预期间评估治疗完成情况和依从性。结果:两种干预措施都改善了从基线到治疗后立即和治疗后3个月随访的所有睡眠结果。在治疗后即刻,ABC-I在睡眠日记SE和客观SE方面静态无劣效,但ISI或PSQI总分的无劣效性未得到统计学证实。在治疗后3个月的随访中,ABC-I在所有四个关键结果变量中均为非劣效。在完成治疗前停止CBT-I(11%)和ABC-I(18%;p=.248)的参与者人数之间没有统计学上的显著差异。ABC-I在某些依从性指标上优于CBT-I。结论:总的来说,ABC-I在治疗失眠方面与CBT-I的疗效相似,并可能提高对某些行为治疗要素的依从性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信