Survival rate of the Hall technique compared with resin composite restoration in multi-surface cavities in primary teeth: a 1-year randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Applied Oral Science Pub Date : 2023-10-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0048
Aline Maquiné Pascareli-Carlos, Tamara Kerber Tedesco, Ana Flávia Bissoto Calvo, Isabela Floriano, Thais Gimenez, Monicque da Silva Gonçalves, Daniela Calumby, José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato
{"title":"Survival rate of the Hall technique compared with resin composite restoration in multi-surface cavities in primary teeth: a 1-year randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Aline Maquiné Pascareli-Carlos,&nbsp;Tamara Kerber Tedesco,&nbsp;Ana Flávia Bissoto Calvo,&nbsp;Isabela Floriano,&nbsp;Thais Gimenez,&nbsp;Monicque da Silva Gonçalves,&nbsp;Daniela Calumby,&nbsp;José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato","doi":"10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hall technique (HT) has been indicated for teeth with dentinal caries lesion; however, extensive cavities, with more than two surfaces still seem challenging for restorative treatment in pediatric dentistry, resulting in a higher failure rate and an increased need for retreatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the survival rate of the Hall technique preformed metal crown (HT) with resin composite restoration (RC) for multi-surface cavitated caries lesions in primary molars.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>In this multicenter two-arm randomized clinical trial, children between 4 and 9 years of age with at least one primary molar with cavitated caries lesion involving more than two surfaces, including one buccal or palatal/lingual surface, were selected from 17 Brazilian cities. A total of 364 teeth were allocated into two groups: (1) teeth treated with selective caries removal and RC and (2) treated with the HT. The survival rate was assessed at 6 and 12 months after the interventions. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan‒Meier method. Cox regression was used to determine the influence of explanatory variables on the survival rate (α=5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 12 months, 292 teeth were re-evaluated. A total of 358 teeth were re-evaluated at least once during the study and included in the survival analysis. The HT (87.8%) resulted in a higher survival rate than RC restoration (75.7%) (p=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HT has a higher survival rate than RC as a treatment for multi-surface cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02782390.</p>","PeriodicalId":15133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Oral Science","volume":"31 ","pages":"e20230048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hall technique (HT) has been indicated for teeth with dentinal caries lesion; however, extensive cavities, with more than two surfaces still seem challenging for restorative treatment in pediatric dentistry, resulting in a higher failure rate and an increased need for retreatment.

Objectives: To compare the survival rate of the Hall technique preformed metal crown (HT) with resin composite restoration (RC) for multi-surface cavitated caries lesions in primary molars.

Methodology: In this multicenter two-arm randomized clinical trial, children between 4 and 9 years of age with at least one primary molar with cavitated caries lesion involving more than two surfaces, including one buccal or palatal/lingual surface, were selected from 17 Brazilian cities. A total of 364 teeth were allocated into two groups: (1) teeth treated with selective caries removal and RC and (2) treated with the HT. The survival rate was assessed at 6 and 12 months after the interventions. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan‒Meier method. Cox regression was used to determine the influence of explanatory variables on the survival rate (α=5%).

Results: After 12 months, 292 teeth were re-evaluated. A total of 358 teeth were re-evaluated at least once during the study and included in the survival analysis. The HT (87.8%) resulted in a higher survival rate than RC restoration (75.7%) (p=0.004).

Conclusion: HT has a higher survival rate than RC as a treatment for multi-surface cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02782390.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Hall技术与树脂复合修复体在乳牙多表面蛀牙中的生存率比较:一项为期1年的随机临床试验。
背景:霍尔技术(HT)已被应用于牙本质龋损的牙齿;然而,在儿科牙科中,具有两个以上表面的大面积蛀牙似乎仍然具有挑战性,导致更高的失败率和更大的再治疗需求。目的:比较Hall技术预成形金属冠(HT)与树脂复合修复体(RC)治疗乳牙多表面龋损的成活率。方法:在这项多中心双臂随机临床试验中,从巴西17个城市中选择了4至9岁的儿童,他们至少有一颗乳牙存在涉及两个以上表面(包括一个颊面或腭面/舌面)的龋齿病变。共有364颗牙齿被分为两组:(1)接受选择性龋齿去除和RC治疗的牙齿和(2)接受HT治疗的牙齿。在干预后6个月和12个月评估生存率。采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析。结果:12个月后,292颗牙齿被重新评估。共有358颗牙齿在研究期间至少进行了一次重新评估,并纳入生存分析。HT(87.8%)的成活率高于RC修复体(75.7%)(p=0.004)。ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02782390。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Journal of Applied Oral Science 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Oral Science is committed in publishing the scientific and technologic advances achieved by the dental community, according to the quality indicators and peer reviewed material, with the objective of assuring its acceptability at the local, regional, national and international levels. The primary goal of The Journal of Applied Oral Science is to publish the outcomes of original investigations as well as invited case reports and invited reviews in the field of Dentistry and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信