Uptake of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents by Blood Cells During Contrast-Enhanced MRI Examination.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001029
Nico Ruprecht, Dixy Parakkattel, Lukas Hofmann, Peter Broekmann, Nicola Lüdi, Christoph Kempf, Johannes Thomas Heverhagen, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
{"title":"Uptake of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents by Blood Cells During Contrast-Enhanced MRI Examination.","authors":"Nico Ruprecht, Dixy Parakkattel, Lukas Hofmann, Peter Broekmann, Nicola Lüdi, Christoph Kempf, Johannes Thomas Heverhagen, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are routinely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. However, there is limited knowledge about the interaction with and distribution of the drug in human cells. This lack of knowledge is surprising, given that the first interaction of the drug occurs with blood cells. Moreover, recent studies reported gadolinium (Gd) deposition within organs, such as the brain. Hence, this study is aiming to determine the uptake of GBCA in blood cells of patients undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI (ce-MRI) examination.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Human blood was exposed to either gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) or Eu-DOTA in vitro or was collected from patients undergoing ce-MRI with Gd-DOTA. Uptake of contrast agents (CAs) by blood cells was quantified by Gd measurements using single-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) or, to confirm Gd-DOTA uptake, by a complementary method using Eu-DOTA by time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uptake of Gd-DOTA or Eu-DOTA into white blood cells (WBCs) ex vivo was detectable by SC-ICP-MS and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The intracellular concentrations were estimated to be in the range of 1-3 μM. However, no CA uptake into erythrocytes was detected with either method. In total, 42 patients between 30 and 84 years old (24 men, 18 women) were enrolled. White blood cells' uptake of Gd was measured by SC-ICP-MS. Isolated WBCs from patients who underwent ce-MRI examination showed substantial Gd uptake; however, the studied patient group showed an inhomogeneous distribution of Gd uptake. Measurements immediately after MRI examination indicated 21-444 attogram/WBC, corresponding to an intracellular Gd concentration in the range from 0.2 to 5.5 μM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms the ex vivo uptake of GBCA by WBCs and provides the first evidence that GBCA is indeed taken up by WBCs in vivo by patients undergoing ce-MRI examination. However, the observed Gd uptake in WBCs does not follow a log-normal distribution commonly observed in the fields of environmental studies, biology, and medicine. Whether cellular uptake of GBCA is linked to the observed deposition of Gd remains unclear. Therefore, studying the interaction between GBCA and human cells may clarify crucial questions about the effects of Gd on patients after MRI examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"372-378"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are routinely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. However, there is limited knowledge about the interaction with and distribution of the drug in human cells. This lack of knowledge is surprising, given that the first interaction of the drug occurs with blood cells. Moreover, recent studies reported gadolinium (Gd) deposition within organs, such as the brain. Hence, this study is aiming to determine the uptake of GBCA in blood cells of patients undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI (ce-MRI) examination.

Materials and methods: Human blood was exposed to either gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) or Eu-DOTA in vitro or was collected from patients undergoing ce-MRI with Gd-DOTA. Uptake of contrast agents (CAs) by blood cells was quantified by Gd measurements using single-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) or, to confirm Gd-DOTA uptake, by a complementary method using Eu-DOTA by time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy, respectively.

Results: Uptake of Gd-DOTA or Eu-DOTA into white blood cells (WBCs) ex vivo was detectable by SC-ICP-MS and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The intracellular concentrations were estimated to be in the range of 1-3 μM. However, no CA uptake into erythrocytes was detected with either method. In total, 42 patients between 30 and 84 years old (24 men, 18 women) were enrolled. White blood cells' uptake of Gd was measured by SC-ICP-MS. Isolated WBCs from patients who underwent ce-MRI examination showed substantial Gd uptake; however, the studied patient group showed an inhomogeneous distribution of Gd uptake. Measurements immediately after MRI examination indicated 21-444 attogram/WBC, corresponding to an intracellular Gd concentration in the range from 0.2 to 5.5 μM.

Conclusions: This study confirms the ex vivo uptake of GBCA by WBCs and provides the first evidence that GBCA is indeed taken up by WBCs in vivo by patients undergoing ce-MRI examination. However, the observed Gd uptake in WBCs does not follow a log-normal distribution commonly observed in the fields of environmental studies, biology, and medicine. Whether cellular uptake of GBCA is linked to the observed deposition of Gd remains unclear. Therefore, studying the interaction between GBCA and human cells may clarify crucial questions about the effects of Gd on patients after MRI examinations.

增强MRI检查期间血细胞对钆基造影剂的吸收。
目的:钆基造影剂(GBCA)是磁共振成像(MRI)检查中常用的造影剂。然而,关于药物在人体细胞中的相互作用和分布,目前知之甚少。鉴于药物的第一次相互作用发生在血细胞中,这种知识的缺乏令人惊讶。此外,最近的研究报道了钆(Gd)在大脑等器官内的沉积。因此,本研究旨在确定接受增强MRI(ce MRI)检查的患者血细胞中GBCA的摄取。材料和方法:将人的血液在体外暴露于钆-葡胺(Gd-DOTA)或Eu-DOTA,或从接受Gd-DOTA ce MRI的患者身上采集。通过使用单细胞电感耦合等离子体质谱法(SC-ICP-MS)的Gd测量来量化血细胞对造影剂(CA)的摄取,或者,为了确认Gd-DOTA的摄取,分别通过使用Eu-DOTA的互补方法通过时间分辨荧光光谱来定量。结果:通过SC-ICP-MS和时间分辨荧光光谱法检测到Gd-DOTA或Eu-DOTA在离体白细胞中的摄取。细胞内浓度估计在1-3μM的范围内。然而,两种方法均未检测到CA进入红细胞。总共有42名年龄在30至84岁之间的患者(24名男性,18名女性)被纳入研究。采用SC-ICP-MS测定白细胞对Gd的摄取。从接受ce MRI检查的患者中分离的WBC显示出大量的Gd摄取;然而,所研究的患者组显示出Gd摄取的不均匀分布。MRI检查后立即测量显示21-444 attogram/WBC,对应于0.2至5.5μM的细胞内Gd浓度。结论:本研究证实了WBC对GBCA的离体摄取,并首次证明接受ce MRI检查的患者体内WBC确实摄取了GBCA。然而,在WBCs中观察到的Gd摄取并不遵循环境研究、生物学和医学领域中常见的对数正态分布。GBCA的细胞摄取是否与观察到的Gd沉积有关尚不清楚。因此,研究GBCA和人类细胞之间的相互作用可能会澄清MRI检查后Gd对患者影响的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信