Deep learning for automated left ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements in 2D echocardiography.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sigurd Zijun Zha, Magnus Rogstadkjernet, Lars Gunnar Klæboe, Helge Skulstad, Bjørn-Jostein Singstad, Andrew Gilbert, Thor Edvardsen, Eigil Samset, Pål Haugar Brekke
{"title":"Deep learning for automated left ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements in 2D echocardiography.","authors":"Sigurd Zijun Zha, Magnus Rogstadkjernet, Lars Gunnar Klæboe, Helge Skulstad, Bjørn-Jostein Singstad, Andrew Gilbert, Thor Edvardsen, Eigil Samset, Pål Haugar Brekke","doi":"10.1186/s12947-023-00317-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) in echocardiography is a common source of error when used to calculate the stroke volume. The aim of this study is to assess whether a deep learning (DL) model, trained on a clinical echocardiographic dataset, can perform automatic LVOTd measurements on par with expert cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data consisted of 649 consecutive transthoracic echocardiographic examinations of patients with coronary artery disease admitted to a university hospital. 1304 LVOTd measurements in the parasternal long axis (PLAX) and zoomed parasternal long axis views (ZPLAX) were collected, with each patient having 1-6 measurements per examination. Data quality control was performed by an expert cardiologist, and spatial geometry data was preserved for each LVOTd measurement to convert DL predictions into metric units. A convolutional neural network based on the U-Net was used as the DL model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean absolute LVOTd error was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.19) mm for DL predictions on the test set. The mean relative LVOTd errors across all data subgroups ranged from 3.8 to 5.1% for the test set. Generally, the DL model had superior performance on the ZPLAX view compared to the PLAX view. DL model precision for patients with repeated LVOTd measurements had a mean coefficient of variation of 2.2 (95% CI 1.6-2.7) %, which was comparable to the clinicians for the test set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL for automatic LVOTd measurements in PLAX and ZPLAX views is feasible when trained on a limited clinical dataset. While the DL predicted LVOTd measurements were within the expected range of clinical inter-observer variability, the robustness of the DL model requires validation on independent datasets. Future experiments using temporal information and anatomical constraints could improve valvular identification and reduce outliers, which are challenges that must be addressed before clinical utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":9613,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Ultrasound","volume":"21 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-023-00317-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) in echocardiography is a common source of error when used to calculate the stroke volume. The aim of this study is to assess whether a deep learning (DL) model, trained on a clinical echocardiographic dataset, can perform automatic LVOTd measurements on par with expert cardiologists.

Methods: Data consisted of 649 consecutive transthoracic echocardiographic examinations of patients with coronary artery disease admitted to a university hospital. 1304 LVOTd measurements in the parasternal long axis (PLAX) and zoomed parasternal long axis views (ZPLAX) were collected, with each patient having 1-6 measurements per examination. Data quality control was performed by an expert cardiologist, and spatial geometry data was preserved for each LVOTd measurement to convert DL predictions into metric units. A convolutional neural network based on the U-Net was used as the DL model.

Results: The mean absolute LVOTd error was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.19) mm for DL predictions on the test set. The mean relative LVOTd errors across all data subgroups ranged from 3.8 to 5.1% for the test set. Generally, the DL model had superior performance on the ZPLAX view compared to the PLAX view. DL model precision for patients with repeated LVOTd measurements had a mean coefficient of variation of 2.2 (95% CI 1.6-2.7) %, which was comparable to the clinicians for the test set.

Conclusion: DL for automatic LVOTd measurements in PLAX and ZPLAX views is feasible when trained on a limited clinical dataset. While the DL predicted LVOTd measurements were within the expected range of clinical inter-observer variability, the robustness of the DL model requires validation on independent datasets. Future experiments using temporal information and anatomical constraints could improve valvular identification and reduce outliers, which are challenges that must be addressed before clinical utilization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在二维超声心动图中自动测量左心室流出道直径的深度学习。
背景:超声心动图中左心室流出道直径(LVOTd)的测量是计算卒中量时常见的误差来源。本研究的目的是评估在临床超声心动图数据集上训练的深度学习(DL)模型是否能够与心脏病专家一样自动进行LVOTd测量。方法:数据包括649例连续经胸超声心动图检查的冠状动脉疾病患者入住大学医院。收集了1304个胸骨旁长轴(PLAX)和胸骨旁长轴放大视图(ZPLAX)的LVOTd测量值,每个患者每次检查有1-6个测量值。由心脏病专家进行数据质量控制,并为每个LVOTd测量保留空间几何数据,以将DL预测转换为度量单位。使用基于U-Net的卷积神经网络作为DL模型。结果:测试集DL预测的平均绝对LVOTd误差为1.04(95%置信区间[CI]0.90-1.19)mm。测试集所有数据亚组的平均相对LVOTd误差范围为3.8%至5.1%。一般来说,与PLAX视图相比,DL模型在ZPLAX视图上具有优越的性能。重复LVOTd测量的患者的DL模型精度的平均变异系数为2.2(95%CI 1.6-2.7)%,与测试集的临床医生相当。结论:当在有限的临床数据集上训练时,用于PLAX和ZPLAX视图中LVOTd自动测量的DL是可行的。虽然DL预测的LVOTd测量值在临床观察者间变异性的预期范围内,但DL模型的稳健性需要在独立数据集上进行验证。未来使用时间信息和解剖约束的实验可以改进瓣膜识别并减少异常值,这是临床应用前必须解决的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Cardiovascular Ultrasound CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Ultrasound is an online journal, publishing peer-reviewed: original research; authoritative reviews; case reports on challenging and/or unusual diagnostic aspects; and expert opinions on new techniques and technologies. We are particularly interested in articles that include relevant images or video files, which provide an additional dimension to published articles and enhance understanding. As an open access journal, Cardiovascular Ultrasound ensures high visibility for authors in addition to providing an up-to-date and freely available resource for the community. The journal welcomes discussion, and provides a forum for publishing opinion and debate ranging from biology to engineering to clinical echocardiography, with both speed and versatility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信