Benzodiazepines in elderly patients

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Giovanni A. Fava
{"title":"Benzodiazepines in elderly patients","authors":"Giovanni A. Fava","doi":"10.1111/acps.13619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For a long time, benzodiazepines have provided an effective treatment of anxiety disorders and sleep disturbances.<span><sup>1</sup></span> They were also found to be helpful in anxious depression, bipolar disorder, catatonia, and in a number of medical conditions, such as epilepsy and alcohol withdrawal.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In the 90s, introduction of second-generation antidepressants provided more expensive modalities of addressing anxiety disorders. Substituting benzodiazepines with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) clearly appeared the commercial way to go. Such road would have been difficult to follow when new medications had to be compared with a gold standard, because direct comparisons clearly indicated higher efficacy and tolerability of benzodiazepines over antidepressants.<span><sup>2</sup></span> However, when such superiority was no longer required by regulatory agencies, comparisons were performed by meta-analytic methods that are liable to manipulation instead of head-to-head.<span><sup>3</sup></span> The other complementary strategy was to magnify side effects of benzodiazepines. As the negative aspects are actually very limited,<span><sup>1</sup></span> the potential for dependency, toxicity, and abuse of benzodiazepines had to be dramatically pictured.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Not surprisingly, a decade ago benzodiazepines were viewed in guidelines and regulatory bodies as having very limited benefits and considerable risks, suitable only for short-term treatment.<span><sup>1, 4</sup></span> Recently, however, a reconsideration of their role and function has occurred. First, studies in pharmacoepidemiology indicate that benzodiazepines are seldom misused or lead to misuse of other substances in patients without substance use disorders who are prescribed these medications for appropriate indications.<span><sup>1, 4</sup></span> Second, withdrawal reactions may occur after discontinuation of both benzodiazepines and antidepressants, but for the latter such events appear to be more troublesome and persistent.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Third, the ghost of dementia evoked in observational studies did not manifest its presence when carefully conducted methodological investigations examined the association.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> The paper by Rozing et al.<span><sup>8</sup></span> adds a fourth important pillar, challenging the associations between benzodiazepines and the risk of falls and fractures.</p><p>Correlational methods in epidemiology entail the risk of yielding spurious results when studying highly heterogeneous constructs and populations. Confounding by indication appears to be particularly challenging in assessing medication risk and falls. It occurs when a person takes a medication (e.g., benzodiazepine) for a disorder (e.g., insomnia), which itself can increase the risk of falling (by waking up at night and walking in the house). Rozing et al.<span><sup>8</sup></span> used a self-controlled case series design where different time periods are considered: baseline unexposed to hypnotic-sedative drugs (24–12 months before initiation); early pretreatment (12–3 months before beginning); pretreatment (3 months immediately preceding the purchase of the medication); treatment (the first 3 months); early posttreatment (3–12 months after treatment initiation); late posttreatment (12–24 months after treatment initiation). Such design may minimize, even though not completely eliminate, confounding by indication. Nearly 700,000 adults with a purchase of benzodiazepines, Z-drugs (medications acting on benzodiazepine receptors that do not have a benzodiazepine structure, i.e., zolpidem and zopiclone) and melatonin in the Danish National Patient Registry between 2000 and 2018 were included. A fall accident occurred in 8.7% of the study population and a fracture in 5.2%.<span><sup>8</sup></span> Their occurrence was likely to be underestimated, because it included only hospital diagnoses. As expected, older age (equal or above 70 years) was found to be related to such occurrences.<span><sup>8</sup></span> For older people, the risk of falls was highest during the pretreatment period, suggesting that their increased risk may be due to factors other than benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, and melatonin, particularly untreated insomnia. The initiation of treatment gradually diminished the risk.</p><p>Can we conclude that hypnotic-sedative medications are devoid of risks associated with falls and fractures and we should not worry about the issue? Not at all: common side effects of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, such as sedation, slowed reaction time, impaired balance and gait, may indeed facilitate falls, even though no more than other medications. Rozing et al.,<span><sup>8</sup></span> in line with the available literature,<span><sup>1</sup></span> underscore the benefits of addressing anxiety and sleep disturbances in the elderly, particularly in the setting of medical disease. An updated consideration of the literature indicates that benzodiazepines are first-line medications for addressing anxiety and sleep disturbances, even though non-pharmacological strategies such as cognitive behavior therapy and lifestyle modifications should have a primary role.<span><sup>1, 2, 4</sup></span></p><p>Falls and fractures are a major source of morbidity and mortality in older patients, triggering a cascade of adverse events, such as pulmonary infections.<span><sup>9</sup></span> Preventing or minimizing the risk of falling deserves clinical attention in managing anxiety and insomnia. Such consideration requires a personalized approach that integrates the mere use of diagnostic criteria leading to automatic prescriptions.<span><sup>3, 10</sup></span> I will use the common and vexing problem of insomnia in elderly patients to illustrate how a personalized approach can be implemented, using examples from my extensive clinical experience.</p><p>Not all patients over 70 years of age present the same risk of falling: strength, gait, and balance impairments, in addition to the occurrence of previous falls, are strong predictors of falling.<span><sup>11</sup></span> In the real world of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, which is quite different from the one depicted by clinical guidelines and evidence-based medicine,<span><sup>3</sup></span> we need to evaluate the overall medical and functional condition of the patient (the geriatric syndrome of frailty reflects this global evaluation), as well as the cumulative effect of the medications that are taken.<span><sup>11</sup></span> Whenever appropriate, deprescribing should be considered,<span><sup>11</sup></span> such as in the case of antidepressant drugs that may increase the risk of falling because of specific side effects (e.g., orthostatic hypotension).<span><sup>10, 12</sup></span> Antidepressant medications, however, are required when early morning awakening associated with a major depressive episode occurs.<span><sup>10</sup></span></p><p>A second aspect that has to be taken into consideration is the fact that not all benzodiazepines are the same and treatment choices should be carefully pondered. Elderly patients are generally more responsive to benzodiazepine effects as a result of increased adipose/lean ratio and decreased plasma proteins, resulting in slowed metabolism, decreased clearance, and longer elimination half-life.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As a result, caution is needed when using benzodiazepines with longer half-lives because of the risk of accumulation.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Moreover, half-life characteristics need to be integrated with relative lipid solubility and binding affinity.<span><sup>13</sup></span> Drugs like triazolam and alprazolam, which have high lipid solubility, are associated with rapid effects, higher dependence liability, cognitive impairment, and anterograde amnestic effects.<span><sup>13</sup></span> On the contrary, benzodiazepines with low affinity for the benzodiazepine receptor and lipid solubility, such as clonazepam, entail slower effects, less dependence liability, and amnestic potential.<span><sup>13</sup></span> In a 12-year national-registry study performed in Luxembourg, about four out of five people who received a benzodiazepine were short-term or intermittent users.<span><sup>14</sup></span> Continuous use, not necessarily associated with dose escalation, occurred in the remaining cases. Alprazolam and triazolam were related to continuous and high-dose use, whereas clonazepam and clobazam were not.<span><sup>14</sup></span> The findings of this investigation support the importance of a specific benzodiazepine selection based on the likelihood of dependence potential and on the specific targets of the prescription.<span><sup>13</sup></span> Dosage may be particularly important as to the risk of falling and fractures. High doses of hypnotics at bedtime are often used, but this practice could also involve an increased risk of falling at night. Even though insomnia may be the presenting symptom, the level of anxiety during the day needs to be evaluated. As a patient once shared with me “it is the day that dictates the night; in certain days when my tension is so high probably only general anesthesia at bedtime would work for me.” I thus tend to avoid the use of hypnotics altogether and favor splitting a benzodiazepine during the day. Very often I have been able to successfully address insomnia that was refractory to hypnotics by switching the patient to very low-dose clonazepam (0.25 mg in two divided doses), with the benefit of avoiding a medication bulk at night.</p><p>A final source of consideration is that the use of benzodiazepines in insomnia should be placed within the context of lifestyle medicine.<span><sup>15</sup></span> Suggestions geared to a better sleep need to be individualized and address unhealthy practices during daytime (e.g., insufficient physical activity, prolonged and/or frequent napping, getting home very late from work), before going to sleep (e.g., caffeine consumption, falling asleep in front of the TV), and during the night (e.g., how to get up from bed, how to go safely to the bathroom). At times, lifestyle suggestions may help avoiding the use of medications; more frequently they may increase their effectiveness and facilitate their tapering and discontinuation. If I write a prescription, I always add a second prescription with lifestyle suggestions, emphasizing that it is at least as important as the first.<span><sup>10</sup></span></p><p>The optimal pharmacological treatment of insomnia should be short also in elderly patients. However, this is difficult in many cases. Fortunately, benzodiazepines do not appear to lose effectiveness with time and are unlikely to require increasing the dose.<span><sup>1</sup></span> You may find, for instance, patients who have been getting a good night sleep by taking 1 mg of lorazepam over many years. The problem is when, for whatever reason, they stop taking it. Very severe withdrawal syndromes,<span><sup>5</sup></span> including delirium, might ensue.</p><p>In conclusion, the findings of the important epidemiological study by Rozing et al.<span><sup>8</sup></span> add to other evidence,<span><sup>1</sup></span> suggesting that benzodiazepines do not increase the risk of falling and fractures more than other medications. However, preventing such occurrences should be a primary source of concern for physicians dealing with anxiety and insomnia in elderly patients.</p><p>The author declares no financial conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"148 5","pages":"391-393"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.13619","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For a long time, benzodiazepines have provided an effective treatment of anxiety disorders and sleep disturbances.1 They were also found to be helpful in anxious depression, bipolar disorder, catatonia, and in a number of medical conditions, such as epilepsy and alcohol withdrawal.1 In the 90s, introduction of second-generation antidepressants provided more expensive modalities of addressing anxiety disorders. Substituting benzodiazepines with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) clearly appeared the commercial way to go. Such road would have been difficult to follow when new medications had to be compared with a gold standard, because direct comparisons clearly indicated higher efficacy and tolerability of benzodiazepines over antidepressants.2 However, when such superiority was no longer required by regulatory agencies, comparisons were performed by meta-analytic methods that are liable to manipulation instead of head-to-head.3 The other complementary strategy was to magnify side effects of benzodiazepines. As the negative aspects are actually very limited,1 the potential for dependency, toxicity, and abuse of benzodiazepines had to be dramatically pictured.4 Not surprisingly, a decade ago benzodiazepines were viewed in guidelines and regulatory bodies as having very limited benefits and considerable risks, suitable only for short-term treatment.1, 4 Recently, however, a reconsideration of their role and function has occurred. First, studies in pharmacoepidemiology indicate that benzodiazepines are seldom misused or lead to misuse of other substances in patients without substance use disorders who are prescribed these medications for appropriate indications.1, 4 Second, withdrawal reactions may occur after discontinuation of both benzodiazepines and antidepressants, but for the latter such events appear to be more troublesome and persistent.5 Third, the ghost of dementia evoked in observational studies did not manifest its presence when carefully conducted methodological investigations examined the association.6, 7 The paper by Rozing et al.8 adds a fourth important pillar, challenging the associations between benzodiazepines and the risk of falls and fractures.

Correlational methods in epidemiology entail the risk of yielding spurious results when studying highly heterogeneous constructs and populations. Confounding by indication appears to be particularly challenging in assessing medication risk and falls. It occurs when a person takes a medication (e.g., benzodiazepine) for a disorder (e.g., insomnia), which itself can increase the risk of falling (by waking up at night and walking in the house). Rozing et al.8 used a self-controlled case series design where different time periods are considered: baseline unexposed to hypnotic-sedative drugs (24–12 months before initiation); early pretreatment (12–3 months before beginning); pretreatment (3 months immediately preceding the purchase of the medication); treatment (the first 3 months); early posttreatment (3–12 months after treatment initiation); late posttreatment (12–24 months after treatment initiation). Such design may minimize, even though not completely eliminate, confounding by indication. Nearly 700,000 adults with a purchase of benzodiazepines, Z-drugs (medications acting on benzodiazepine receptors that do not have a benzodiazepine structure, i.e., zolpidem and zopiclone) and melatonin in the Danish National Patient Registry between 2000 and 2018 were included. A fall accident occurred in 8.7% of the study population and a fracture in 5.2%.8 Their occurrence was likely to be underestimated, because it included only hospital diagnoses. As expected, older age (equal or above 70 years) was found to be related to such occurrences.8 For older people, the risk of falls was highest during the pretreatment period, suggesting that their increased risk may be due to factors other than benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, and melatonin, particularly untreated insomnia. The initiation of treatment gradually diminished the risk.

Can we conclude that hypnotic-sedative medications are devoid of risks associated with falls and fractures and we should not worry about the issue? Not at all: common side effects of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, such as sedation, slowed reaction time, impaired balance and gait, may indeed facilitate falls, even though no more than other medications. Rozing et al.,8 in line with the available literature,1 underscore the benefits of addressing anxiety and sleep disturbances in the elderly, particularly in the setting of medical disease. An updated consideration of the literature indicates that benzodiazepines are first-line medications for addressing anxiety and sleep disturbances, even though non-pharmacological strategies such as cognitive behavior therapy and lifestyle modifications should have a primary role.1, 2, 4

Falls and fractures are a major source of morbidity and mortality in older patients, triggering a cascade of adverse events, such as pulmonary infections.9 Preventing or minimizing the risk of falling deserves clinical attention in managing anxiety and insomnia. Such consideration requires a personalized approach that integrates the mere use of diagnostic criteria leading to automatic prescriptions.3, 10 I will use the common and vexing problem of insomnia in elderly patients to illustrate how a personalized approach can be implemented, using examples from my extensive clinical experience.

Not all patients over 70 years of age present the same risk of falling: strength, gait, and balance impairments, in addition to the occurrence of previous falls, are strong predictors of falling.11 In the real world of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, which is quite different from the one depicted by clinical guidelines and evidence-based medicine,3 we need to evaluate the overall medical and functional condition of the patient (the geriatric syndrome of frailty reflects this global evaluation), as well as the cumulative effect of the medications that are taken.11 Whenever appropriate, deprescribing should be considered,11 such as in the case of antidepressant drugs that may increase the risk of falling because of specific side effects (e.g., orthostatic hypotension).10, 12 Antidepressant medications, however, are required when early morning awakening associated with a major depressive episode occurs.10

A second aspect that has to be taken into consideration is the fact that not all benzodiazepines are the same and treatment choices should be carefully pondered. Elderly patients are generally more responsive to benzodiazepine effects as a result of increased adipose/lean ratio and decreased plasma proteins, resulting in slowed metabolism, decreased clearance, and longer elimination half-life.1 As a result, caution is needed when using benzodiazepines with longer half-lives because of the risk of accumulation.1 Moreover, half-life characteristics need to be integrated with relative lipid solubility and binding affinity.13 Drugs like triazolam and alprazolam, which have high lipid solubility, are associated with rapid effects, higher dependence liability, cognitive impairment, and anterograde amnestic effects.13 On the contrary, benzodiazepines with low affinity for the benzodiazepine receptor and lipid solubility, such as clonazepam, entail slower effects, less dependence liability, and amnestic potential.13 In a 12-year national-registry study performed in Luxembourg, about four out of five people who received a benzodiazepine were short-term or intermittent users.14 Continuous use, not necessarily associated with dose escalation, occurred in the remaining cases. Alprazolam and triazolam were related to continuous and high-dose use, whereas clonazepam and clobazam were not.14 The findings of this investigation support the importance of a specific benzodiazepine selection based on the likelihood of dependence potential and on the specific targets of the prescription.13 Dosage may be particularly important as to the risk of falling and fractures. High doses of hypnotics at bedtime are often used, but this practice could also involve an increased risk of falling at night. Even though insomnia may be the presenting symptom, the level of anxiety during the day needs to be evaluated. As a patient once shared with me “it is the day that dictates the night; in certain days when my tension is so high probably only general anesthesia at bedtime would work for me.” I thus tend to avoid the use of hypnotics altogether and favor splitting a benzodiazepine during the day. Very often I have been able to successfully address insomnia that was refractory to hypnotics by switching the patient to very low-dose clonazepam (0.25 mg in two divided doses), with the benefit of avoiding a medication bulk at night.

A final source of consideration is that the use of benzodiazepines in insomnia should be placed within the context of lifestyle medicine.15 Suggestions geared to a better sleep need to be individualized and address unhealthy practices during daytime (e.g., insufficient physical activity, prolonged and/or frequent napping, getting home very late from work), before going to sleep (e.g., caffeine consumption, falling asleep in front of the TV), and during the night (e.g., how to get up from bed, how to go safely to the bathroom). At times, lifestyle suggestions may help avoiding the use of medications; more frequently they may increase their effectiveness and facilitate their tapering and discontinuation. If I write a prescription, I always add a second prescription with lifestyle suggestions, emphasizing that it is at least as important as the first.10

The optimal pharmacological treatment of insomnia should be short also in elderly patients. However, this is difficult in many cases. Fortunately, benzodiazepines do not appear to lose effectiveness with time and are unlikely to require increasing the dose.1 You may find, for instance, patients who have been getting a good night sleep by taking 1 mg of lorazepam over many years. The problem is when, for whatever reason, they stop taking it. Very severe withdrawal syndromes,5 including delirium, might ensue.

In conclusion, the findings of the important epidemiological study by Rozing et al.8 add to other evidence,1 suggesting that benzodiazepines do not increase the risk of falling and fractures more than other medications. However, preventing such occurrences should be a primary source of concern for physicians dealing with anxiety and insomnia in elderly patients.

The author declares no financial conflict of interest.

老年患者中的苯二氮卓类药物
长期以来,苯二氮卓类药物为焦虑症和睡眠障碍提供了有效的治疗方法。1它们还被发现对焦虑抑郁、双相情感障碍、紧张症以及癫痫和酒精戒断等多种疾病有帮助。1在90年代,第二代抗抑郁药的引入为解决焦虑症提供了更昂贵的方式。用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)和5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再吸收抑制剂(SNRI)取代苯二氮卓类药物显然是商业途径。当新药必须与金标准进行比较时,这条路很难走,因为直接比较清楚地表明苯二氮卓类药物比抗抑郁药更高的疗效和耐受性。2然而,当监管机构不再要求这种优越性时,通过荟萃分析方法进行比较,这些方法易于操作,而不是头对头。3另一种补充策略是放大苯二氮卓类药物的副作用。由于负面影响实际上非常有限,1必须对苯二氮卓类药物的依赖性、毒性和滥用潜力进行戏剧性的描述。4毫不奇怪,十年前,指南和监管机构认为苯二氮卓类药物的益处非常有限,风险相当大,仅适用于短期治疗。1,4然而,最近,对它们的作用和功能进行了重新思考。首先,药物流行病学研究表明,在没有药物使用障碍的患者中,苯二氮卓类药物很少被滥用或导致其他物质的滥用,这些患者因适当的适应症而服用这些药物。1,4其次,在停用苯二氮卓类药物和抗抑郁药后,可能会出现戒断反应,但对于后者来说,这类事件似乎更麻烦、更持久。5第三,当仔细进行方法学调查来检验这种关联时,观察性研究中引发的痴呆幽灵并没有表现出来。6,7 Rozing等人的论文8增加了第四个重要支柱,挑战苯二氮卓类药物与跌倒和骨折风险之间的联系。流行病学中的相关方法在研究高度异质的结构和人群时会产生虚假结果的风险。在评估用药风险和跌倒时,适应症的混淆似乎特别具有挑战性。当一个人服用治疗疾病(如失眠)的药物(如苯二氮卓类药物)时,就会发生这种情况,而这种疾病本身会增加跌倒的风险(通过晚上醒来和在家里行走)。Rozing等人8使用了一个自我控制的病例系列设计,其中考虑了不同的时间段:基线未暴露于催眠镇静药物(24-12 启动前几个月);早期预处理(12-3 开始前几个月);预处理(3 在购买药物之前的几个月);治疗(前3 月);早期后处理(3-12 治疗开始后数月);后期治疗(12-24 治疗开始后数月)。这种设计可以最大限度地减少(即使不是完全消除)适应症引起的混淆。2000年至2018年间,丹麦国家患者登记处有近70万名购买苯二氮卓类药物、Z-药物(作用于不具有苯二氮卓类结构的苯二氮杂类受体的药物,即唑吡坦和佐匹克隆)和褪黑素的成年人被包括在内。8.7%的研究人群发生了跌倒事故,5.2%的人发生了骨折。8他们的发生率可能被低估了,因为这只包括医院诊断。不出所料,年龄较大(等于或超过70岁 8对于老年人来说,在预处理期间跌倒的风险最高,这表明他们的风险增加可能是由于苯二氮卓类药物、Z-药物和褪黑素以外的因素,特别是未经治疗的失眠。治疗的开始逐渐降低了风险。我们是否可以得出结论,催眠镇静药物没有与跌倒和骨折相关的风险,我们不应该担心这个问题?一点也不:苯二氮卓类药物和Z类药物的常见副作用,如镇静、反应时间减慢、平衡和步态受损,确实可能会导致跌倒,尽管并不比其他药物更容易。Rozing等人,8与现有文献一致,1强调了解决老年人焦虑和睡眠障碍的好处,特别是在医疗疾病的情况下。对文献的最新考虑表明,苯二氮卓类药物是解决焦虑和睡眠障碍的一线药物,尽管认知行为治疗和生活方式改变等非药物策略应该发挥主要作用。 1、2、4跌倒和骨折是老年患者发病率和死亡率的主要来源,会引发一系列不良事件,如肺部感染。9在管理焦虑和失眠方面,预防或最大限度地降低跌倒风险值得临床关注。这样的考虑需要一种个性化的方法,将仅仅使用诊断标准结合起来,从而实现自动处方。3,10我将用我丰富的临床经验中的例子,用老年患者失眠这一常见而令人烦恼的问题来说明如何实施个性化的方法。并非所有70岁以上的患者 年龄的人也有同样的跌倒风险:力量、步态和平衡障碍,加上之前跌倒的发生,是跌倒的有力预测因素。11在多发病和多药物治疗的现实世界中,这与临床指南和循证医学所描述的截然不同,3我们需要评估患者的整体医疗和功能状况(老年虚弱综合征反映了这一总体评估),以及所服用药物的累积效果。11在适当的时候,应考虑取消描述,11例如在抗抑郁药物的情况下,由于特定的副作用(如直立性低血压),可能会增加跌倒的风险。10,12然而,抗抑郁药物,当出现与严重抑郁发作相关的清晨醒来时,需要使用。10必须考虑的第二个方面是,并非所有的苯二氮卓类药物都是相同的,应该仔细考虑治疗选择。老年患者通常对苯二氮卓类药物的作用更敏感,这是由于脂肪/瘦肉比例增加和血浆蛋白减少,导致新陈代谢减慢、清除率降低和消除半衰期延长。1因此,在使用半衰期较长的苯二氮卓类药物时需要谨慎,因为存在积累的风险。1此外,半衰期特征需要与相对脂溶性和结合亲和力相结合。13三唑仑和阿普唑仑等药物具有高脂溶性,与快速起效、更高的依赖性、认知障碍和顺行遗忘效应有关。13相反,对苯二氮卓类药物受体亲和力和脂溶性较低的苯二氮卓类药物,如氯硝西泮,效果较慢,依赖性较低,有失忆的可能。13在卢森堡进行的一项为期12年的国家注册研究中,大约五分之四的苯二氢卓类药物使用者是短期或间歇性使用者。14连续使用,不一定与剂量增加有关的其他病例。阿普唑仑和三唑仑与持续和高剂量使用有关,而氯硝西泮和氯巴唑仑则不然。14本研究结果支持了根据潜在依赖性的可能性和处方的特定靶点选择特定苯二氮卓类药物的重要性。13剂量对跌倒和骨折的风险可能特别重要。睡前经常使用高剂量的催眠药,但这种做法也可能增加夜间跌倒的风险。尽管失眠可能是主要症状,但需要评估白天的焦虑程度。正如一位患者曾与我分享的那样,“白天决定夜晚;在某些日子里,当我的紧张情绪如此之高时,可能只有睡前全身麻醉对我有效。”因此,我倾向于完全避免使用催眠药,而喜欢在白天服用苯二氮卓类药物。我经常能够通过将患者换成非常低剂量的氯硝西泮(0.25 mg,分两次给药),有利于避免夜间大量用药。最后一个考虑因素是,在失眠中使用苯二氮卓类药物应纳入生活方式医学的范畴。15旨在改善睡眠的建议需要个性化,并解决白天的不健康行为(例如,身体活动不足、长时间和/或频繁打盹、下班回家很晚),睡前(例如,摄入咖啡因,在电视机前入睡)和夜间(例如,如何从床上起床,如何安全地上厕所)。有时,生活方式建议可能有助于避免使用药物;更频繁地,它们可以提高它们的有效性并促进它们的逐渐减少和停止。如果我开了一个处方,我总是加上第二个处方和生活方式建议,强调它至少和第一个一样重要。10失眠的最佳药物治疗也应该短于老年患者。然而,这在许多情况下是困难的。 幸运的是,苯二氮卓类药物似乎不会随着时间的推移而失效,也不太可能需要增加剂量。1例如,你可能会发现,患者通过服用1 mg劳拉西泮。问题是,无论出于何种原因,他们何时停止服用。可能会出现非常严重的戒断综合征,包括谵妄。总之,Rozing等人8的重要流行病学研究结果补充了其他证据,1表明苯二氮卓类药物不会比其他药物更增加跌倒和骨折的风险。然而,对于治疗老年患者焦虑和失眠的医生来说,预防这种情况应该是首要关注的问题。提交人声明没有经济利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信