Comparative Analysis of Bone Resection Versus Bone Curettage in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.

Shaima Kmari-El-Ghazouany, Aroa Tardáguila-García, Mateo López-Moral, Marta García-Madrid, Yolanda García-Álvarez, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Bone Resection Versus Bone Curettage in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.","authors":"Shaima Kmari-El-Ghazouany,&nbsp;Aroa Tardáguila-García,&nbsp;Mateo López-Moral,&nbsp;Marta García-Madrid,&nbsp;Yolanda García-Álvarez,&nbsp;José Luis Lázaro-Martínez","doi":"10.1177/15347346231206448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to describe the healing times of patients who underwent bone resection compared to bone curettage for managing diabetic foot osteomyelitis and to compare short- and long-term complications. This analytical retrospective observational cohort study collected clinical records of patients from a specialized diabetic foot clinic who underwent resection or bone curettage between January 2017 and January 2022. After surgery, a 1-year follow-up was conducted to record healing times and short- and long-term complications. The study included thirty-one patients, with 19 (61.29%) undergoing resections and 11 (38.71%) undergoing bone curettages. The resection cohort had a mean healing time of 5.70 ± 6.05 weeks, whereas the curettage cohort had a mean healing time of 14.45 ± 11.78 weeks, showing a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.011). No significant differences were observed in terms of short- and long-term complications. In the resection cohort, 12 (63.20%) experienced short-term complications, compared to eight (66.70%) in the curettage cohort (<i>P</i> = 0.842, χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.40, OR = 1.16). In the resection cohort, n = 6 (31.60%) had long-term complications, while n = 3 (25.00%) in the curettage cohort experienced long-term complications (<i>P</i> = 0.694, χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.155, OR = 0.72). Although there were no significant differences in short- and long-term complications between resection and curettage, the resection group showed shorter healing times.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231206448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe the healing times of patients who underwent bone resection compared to bone curettage for managing diabetic foot osteomyelitis and to compare short- and long-term complications. This analytical retrospective observational cohort study collected clinical records of patients from a specialized diabetic foot clinic who underwent resection or bone curettage between January 2017 and January 2022. After surgery, a 1-year follow-up was conducted to record healing times and short- and long-term complications. The study included thirty-one patients, with 19 (61.29%) undergoing resections and 11 (38.71%) undergoing bone curettages. The resection cohort had a mean healing time of 5.70 ± 6.05 weeks, whereas the curettage cohort had a mean healing time of 14.45 ± 11.78 weeks, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.011). No significant differences were observed in terms of short- and long-term complications. In the resection cohort, 12 (63.20%) experienced short-term complications, compared to eight (66.70%) in the curettage cohort (P = 0.842, χ2 = 0.40, OR = 1.16). In the resection cohort, n = 6 (31.60%) had long-term complications, while n = 3 (25.00%) in the curettage cohort experienced long-term complications (P = 0.694, χ2 = 0.155, OR = 0.72). Although there were no significant differences in short- and long-term complications between resection and curettage, the resection group showed shorter healing times.

糖尿病足骨髓炎骨切除术与刮骨术的比较分析。
本研究旨在描述接受骨切除术与刮骨术治疗糖尿病足骨髓炎的患者的愈合时间,并比较短期和长期并发症。这项分析性回顾性观察队列研究收集了2017年1月至2022年1月期间接受切除或刮骨的糖尿病足专科诊所患者的临床记录。手术后,进行了一年的随访,以记录愈合时间以及短期和长期并发症。该研究包括31名患者,其中19名(61.29%)接受了切除术,11名(38.71%)接受了刮骨术。切除组的平均愈合时间为5.70 ± 6.05周,而刮宫组的平均愈合时间为14.45 ± 11.78周,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.011)。在短期和长期并发症方面没有观察到显著差异。在切除组中,12例(63.20%)出现短期并发症,而刮宫组中有8例(66.70%)出现并发症(P = 0.842,χ2 = 0.40,或 = 1.16)。在切除队列中 = 长期并发症6例(31.60%) = 刮宫组有3例(25.00%)出现长期并发症(P = 0.694,χ2 = 0.155,或 = 0.72)。尽管切除术和刮宫术在短期和长期并发症方面没有显著差异,但切除组的愈合时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信