An Evaluation of a Community Hospital's Emergency Department Ultrasonography Processes for the Diagnosis of Acute Pediatric Appendicitis.

Spartan medical research journal Pub Date : 2020-01-30
Tanner Davis, Samuel J Wisniewski, Heidi Suidinski, Joe Betcher
{"title":"An Evaluation of a Community Hospital's Emergency Department Ultrasonography Processes for the Diagnosis of Acute Pediatric Appendicitis.","authors":"Tanner Davis, Samuel J Wisniewski, Heidi Suidinski, Joe Betcher","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Since the 1980s, the use of ultrasonography for suspected acute pediatric appendicitis has become increasingly common. Multiple studies have suggested that ultrasound of the appendix has consistently high sensitivity and specificity when the appendix can be clearly visualized. The authors' primary objective for this study was to retrospectively evaluate their community-based healthcare system's processes for detecting acute pediatric appendicitis using ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective medical chart review study of data over a five-year 2014-2018 period at Mercy Health Muskegon in Muskegon, Michigan. All patients aged 3-18 years who had received an appendix ultrasound during this period were identified using the McKesson Radiology (MS) PACS-Lite computer program. Pediatric appendix ultrasound cases were collected and analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value with 95% confidence intervals. Acute appendicitis cases had been confirmed based on pathology reports. Secondary measures including white blood cell, body mass index, and body temperature were also included in analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample, the overall sensitivity at detecting acute pediatric appendicitis using ultrasonography was relatively low at approximately 42% (95% CI: 21.1 - 66.0%). On the other hand, sample specificity was quite high at 97% (95% CI: 89.9 - 99.5%). The overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 80% (95% CI: 44.2-96.5%) and the negative predictive Value (NPV) was 86% (95% CI: 75.7-92.4%). The occurrence for false positives was 20% (95% CI: 3.5-55.8%). False negatives were 14% (95% CI: 7.6-24.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of ultrasonography at the authors' institution less often accurately identified cases of later-confirmed pediatric appendicitis compared to some earlier published studies. The authors concluded that this could be due to seeing a lower number of more complex/ambiguous cases of pediatric appendicitis or lack of hospital personnel's pediatric-specific training and/or experience compared to specialty children's hospitals. It is possible that imaging improvements could be achieved by either or a combination of: offering training sessions for general ultrasound technicians, offering training session for radiologists, and visiting pediatric physicians and ultrasound technicians. A valuable follow-up study would be to track anticipated improvements and lead to formulation of an acute pediatric appendicitis care protocol within the authors' healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"11639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Since the 1980s, the use of ultrasonography for suspected acute pediatric appendicitis has become increasingly common. Multiple studies have suggested that ultrasound of the appendix has consistently high sensitivity and specificity when the appendix can be clearly visualized. The authors' primary objective for this study was to retrospectively evaluate their community-based healthcare system's processes for detecting acute pediatric appendicitis using ultrasonography.

Methods: This was a retrospective medical chart review study of data over a five-year 2014-2018 period at Mercy Health Muskegon in Muskegon, Michigan. All patients aged 3-18 years who had received an appendix ultrasound during this period were identified using the McKesson Radiology (MS) PACS-Lite computer program. Pediatric appendix ultrasound cases were collected and analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value with 95% confidence intervals. Acute appendicitis cases had been confirmed based on pathology reports. Secondary measures including white blood cell, body mass index, and body temperature were also included in analyses.

Results: In this sample, the overall sensitivity at detecting acute pediatric appendicitis using ultrasonography was relatively low at approximately 42% (95% CI: 21.1 - 66.0%). On the other hand, sample specificity was quite high at 97% (95% CI: 89.9 - 99.5%). The overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 80% (95% CI: 44.2-96.5%) and the negative predictive Value (NPV) was 86% (95% CI: 75.7-92.4%). The occurrence for false positives was 20% (95% CI: 3.5-55.8%). False negatives were 14% (95% CI: 7.6-24.3%).

Conclusions: The use of ultrasonography at the authors' institution less often accurately identified cases of later-confirmed pediatric appendicitis compared to some earlier published studies. The authors concluded that this could be due to seeing a lower number of more complex/ambiguous cases of pediatric appendicitis or lack of hospital personnel's pediatric-specific training and/or experience compared to specialty children's hospitals. It is possible that imaging improvements could be achieved by either or a combination of: offering training sessions for general ultrasound technicians, offering training session for radiologists, and visiting pediatric physicians and ultrasound technicians. A valuable follow-up study would be to track anticipated improvements and lead to formulation of an acute pediatric appendicitis care protocol within the authors' healthcare system.

社区医院急诊科超声诊断小儿急性阑尾炎的评价。
背景:自20世纪80年代以来,超声检查在疑似急性小儿阑尾炎中的应用越来越普遍。多项研究表明,当阑尾能够清晰可见时,阑尾的超声检查具有一贯的高灵敏度和特异性。这项研究的主要目的是回顾性评估他们的社区医疗系统使用超声检测急性儿童阑尾炎的过程。方法:这是对密歇根州马斯科贡市Mercy Health Muskegon 2014-2018年期间的数据进行的回顾性医学图表回顾研究。使用McKesson Radiology(MS)PACS-Lite计算机程序识别在此期间接受过阑尾超声检查的所有3-18岁患者。收集并分析儿科阑尾超声病例的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,置信区间为95%。急性阑尾炎病例已根据病理报告得到证实。分析中还包括白细胞、体重指数和体温等次要指标。结果:在该样本中,使用超声检测急性儿童阑尾炎的总体灵敏度相对较低,约为42%(95%CI:21.1-66.0%)。另一方面,样本特异性高达97%(95%CI:89.9-99.5%)。总体阳性预测值(PPV)为80%(95%CI:44.2-96.5%),阴性预测值(NPV)为86%(95%CI:75.7-92.4%)。假阳性发生率为20%(95%CI:3.5-55.8%)。假阴性发生率为14%(95%CI:7.6-24.3%)。结论:作者所在机构使用超声检查的频率较低与一些早期发表的研究相比,准确识别了后来确诊的儿童阑尾炎病例。作者得出结论,这可能是因为与专业儿童医院相比,儿童阑尾炎的复杂/模糊病例数量较少,或者医院人员缺乏儿科专业培训和/或经验。成像改进可能通过以下两种方式之一或组合实现:为普通超声技术人员提供培训课程,为放射科医生提供培训课程以及拜访儿科医生和超声技术人员。一项有价值的后续研究是追踪预期的改善,并在作者的医疗系统内制定急性小儿阑尾炎护理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信