Chapitre 18. Loi relative à la bioéthique 2021 : de quelques interrogations dans la pratique des équipes médicales.

Louis Bujan
{"title":"Chapitre 18. Loi relative à la bioéthique 2021 : de quelques interrogations dans la pratique des équipes médicales.","authors":"Louis Bujan","doi":"10.3917/jibes.342.0235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The law on bioethics of 2 August 2021 introduced a number of innovations that have raised many questions for professionals. For the medical teams at assisted reproduction centres, the disappearance of the notion of medical indication represents a real paradigm shift. Should there be limits on access to MAP methods? The legal texts set certain limits. Are these limits related to human physiology, to the benefit-risk ratio or to social or medico-economic considerations? We will discuss the issues of the age at which a person can benefit from PGM, self-preservation of gametes for his or her own benefit, access to the donor&#8217;s identity and special interviews with the multidisciplinary team. Finally, the need for clear, objective information will be emphasised, especially as article 4 of the law provides for a public health plan: prevention/public education, information/female and male fertility, which to date has not been mentioned.</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.342.0235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The law on bioethics of 2 August 2021 introduced a number of innovations that have raised many questions for professionals. For the medical teams at assisted reproduction centres, the disappearance of the notion of medical indication represents a real paradigm shift. Should there be limits on access to MAP methods? The legal texts set certain limits. Are these limits related to human physiology, to the benefit-risk ratio or to social or medico-economic considerations? We will discuss the issues of the age at which a person can benefit from PGM, self-preservation of gametes for his or her own benefit, access to the donor’s identity and special interviews with the multidisciplinary team. Finally, the need for clear, objective information will be emphasised, especially as article 4 of the law provides for a public health plan: prevention/public education, information/female and male fertility, which to date has not been mentioned.

第18章。2021年生物伦理法:医疗队实践中的一些问题。
2021年8月2日的生物伦理法引入了一系列创新,给专业人士带来了许多问题。对于辅助生殖中心的医疗团队来说,医学适应症概念的消失代表着一种真正的范式转变。是否应该限制MAP方法的使用?法律文本设定了一定的限制。这些限制是否与人类生理学、收益风险比或社会或医学经济因素有关?我们将讨论一个人可以从PGM中受益的年龄、为了他或她自己的利益而自我保存配子、获得捐赠者的途径等问题;的身份和对多学科团队的特别采访。最后,将强调提供明确、客观信息的必要性,特别是该法第4条规定了一项公共卫生计划:预防/公共教育、信息/女性和男性生育率,迄今为止尚未提及这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信