Experiences With and Access to Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs for Older American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Peoples.

Abstract

Evidence-based programs (EBPs) work effectively for participants whose characteristics match those of the EBP research participants. However, EBPs have been almost exclusively developed and evaluated for the general U.S. population with limited American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian (AI/AN/NH) community engagement. Thus, an AI/AN/NH Evidence-Based Program Advisory Council sought to identify AI/AN/NH peoples' experiences with and access to EBPs. We held 20 listening sessions with AI/AN/NH Elder services program staff (n = 118) and with AI/AN/NH Elders (n = 82) and conducted a self-administered online survey with Title VI Directors (n = 63). The six themes that emerged from the listening sessions with staff included misunderstanding community engagement, valuing fidelity over flexibility, lack of cultural awareness, assumptions about available infrastructure, unrealistic implementation timelines, and funding restrictions. Listening session themes with Elders included definitions of aging well, participation motivators, preferred activities, participation barriers, and unmet needs. Survey data indicated that programming of greatest interest for Elders as identified by Title VI Directors and staff included and/or addressed cultural activities (81%), socialization (75%), diabetes (73%), caregiving (68%), and nutrition (68%). Seventy-six percent of survey respondents had heard of EBPs and 24% indicated that EBPs were not being implemented in their community. The Advisory Council developed specific action steps with the goal of improving AI/AN/NH communities' access to culturally appropriate and feasible EBPs. The steps require collective action from federal agencies, national partners, EBP program developers and administrators, local organizations, and Elders to ensure EBPs are accessible and culturally appropriate for AI/AN/NH Elders.