[Utilization of Outpatient Psychotherapy and Outpatient Psychiatric Treatment by Men and Women after Inpatient Treatment due to Suicide Attempt or Acute Suicidal Crisis].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2163-1448
Cora Spahn, Lena Spangenberg, Tobias Teismann, Thomas Forkmann, Antje Schönfelder, Dajana Schreiber, Laura Paashaus, Katarina Stengler, Heide Glaesmer
{"title":"[Utilization of Outpatient Psychotherapy and Outpatient Psychiatric Treatment by Men and Women after Inpatient Treatment due to Suicide Attempt or Acute Suicidal Crisis].","authors":"Cora Spahn, Lena Spangenberg, Tobias Teismann, Thomas Forkmann, Antje Schönfelder, Dajana Schreiber, Laura Paashaus, Katarina Stengler, Heide Glaesmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2163-1448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The strongest predictor of suicide attempts is a previous suicide attempt. Individuals hospitalized for suicidal ideation and behavior face an increased risk of suicide following discharge. This study investigates the extent to which outpatient treatment services are utilized the first 6 months after discharge and whether men and women differ in this regard.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study examines data of 124 individuals (with suicide attempts (lifetime), 59.7% female) on the use of outpatient treatment services in the 6 months after inpatient treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37.9% (N=47) of individuals reported not having used any treatment services at all. Men were significantly less likely to make use of the services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Members of a group with an increased risk of suicide, to a large extent, fail to make use of outpatient treatment services. Discharge management should increasingly focus on (gender-specific) barriers and pave the way for treatment in outpatient.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":"99-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2163-1448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The strongest predictor of suicide attempts is a previous suicide attempt. Individuals hospitalized for suicidal ideation and behavior face an increased risk of suicide following discharge. This study investigates the extent to which outpatient treatment services are utilized the first 6 months after discharge and whether men and women differ in this regard.

Method: The study examines data of 124 individuals (with suicide attempts (lifetime), 59.7% female) on the use of outpatient treatment services in the 6 months after inpatient treatment.

Results: 37.9% (N=47) of individuals reported not having used any treatment services at all. Men were significantly less likely to make use of the services.

Conclusion: Members of a group with an increased risk of suicide, to a large extent, fail to make use of outpatient treatment services. Discharge management should increasingly focus on (gender-specific) barriers and pave the way for treatment in outpatient.

[男性和女性在因自杀未遂或急性自杀危机住院治疗后使用门诊精神治疗和门诊精神治疗]。
目的:自杀未遂的最强预测因素是先前的自杀未遂。因自杀意念和行为而住院的个人出院后自杀风险增加。本研究调查了出院后前6个月门诊治疗服务的使用程度,以及男性和女性在这方面是否存在差异。方法:本研究调查了124名自杀未遂者(终生),59.7%的女性)在住院治疗后6个月内使用门诊治疗服务的数据。结果:37.9%(N=47)的人报告根本没有使用过任何治疗服务。男性使用这些服务的可能性明显降低。结论:自杀风险增加的群体成员在很大程度上没有利用门诊治疗服务。出院管理应越来越关注(特定性别的)障碍,并为门诊治疗铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信