Sarah Fritz, Markus Kösters, Andreas Allgöwer, Thomas Becker, Reinhold Kilian, Uta Gühne, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Jessica Baumgärtner, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Johanna Breilmann
{"title":"[Influence of guideline recommendations, care structures and individual factors on the use of psychosocial therapies in severely mentally ill people].","authors":"Sarah Fritz, Markus Kösters, Andreas Allgöwer, Thomas Becker, Reinhold Kilian, Uta Gühne, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Jessica Baumgärtner, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Johanna Breilmann","doi":"10.1055/a-2133-3527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The influence of guideline recommendations and other factors on the utilization of psychosocial interventions in people with severe mental illness was examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a cross-sectional study of 397 people with severe mental illness were analysed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients are less likely to receive therapies with a strong recommendation compared to other levels of recommendation. Various other factors are diffusely associated with utilization rates, but no ubiquitous predictors could be identified across all therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current practice in the use of psychosocial interventions does not follow guideline recommendation strength. Interventions with strong recommendations are probably not available across services. Consequently, routine practice is not able to follow guideline recommendations according to their strength. Other consistent predictors could not be identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2133-3527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The influence of guideline recommendations and other factors on the utilization of psychosocial interventions in people with severe mental illness was examined.
Methods: Data from a cross-sectional study of 397 people with severe mental illness were analysed descriptively.
Results: Patients are less likely to receive therapies with a strong recommendation compared to other levels of recommendation. Various other factors are diffusely associated with utilization rates, but no ubiquitous predictors could be identified across all therapies.
Conclusion: Current practice in the use of psychosocial interventions does not follow guideline recommendation strength. Interventions with strong recommendations are probably not available across services. Consequently, routine practice is not able to follow guideline recommendations according to their strength. Other consistent predictors could not be identified.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
