SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid.

IF 5.3 2区 生物学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
A Sofia F Oliveira, Deborah K Shoemark, Andrew D Davidson, Imre Berger, Christiane Schaffitzel, Adrian J Mulholland
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 spike variants differ in their allosteric responses to linoleic acid.","authors":"A Sofia F Oliveira, Deborah K Shoemark, Andrew D Davidson, Imre Berger, Christiane Schaffitzel, Adrian J Mulholland","doi":"10.1093/jmcb/mjad021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains a functionally important fatty acid (FA) binding site, which is also found in some other coronaviruses, e.g. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The occupancy of the FA site by linoleic acid (LA) reduces infectivity by 'locking' the spike in a less infectious conformation. Here, we use dynamical-nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (D-NEMD) simulations to compare the allosteric responses of spike variants to LA removal. D-NEMD simulations show that the FA site is coupled to other functional regions of the protein, e.g. the receptor-binding motif (RBM), N-terminal domain (NTD), furin cleavage site, and regions surrounding the fusion peptide. D-NEMD simulations also identify the allosteric networks connecting the FA site to these functional regions. The comparison between the wild-type spike and four variants (Alpha, Delta, Delta plus, and Omicron BA.1) shows that the variants differ significantly in their responses to LA removal. The allosteric connections to the FA site on Alpha are generally similar to those on the wild-type protein, with the exception of the RBM and the S71-R78 region, which show a weaker link to the FA site. In contrast, Omicron is the most different variant, exhibiting significant differences in the RBM, NTD, V622-L629, and furin cleavage site. These differences in the allosteric modulation may be of functional relevance, potentially affecting transmissibility and virulence. Experimental comparison of the effects of LA on SARS-CoV-2 variants, including emerging variants, is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16433,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Cell Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjad021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains a functionally important fatty acid (FA) binding site, which is also found in some other coronaviruses, e.g. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The occupancy of the FA site by linoleic acid (LA) reduces infectivity by 'locking' the spike in a less infectious conformation. Here, we use dynamical-nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (D-NEMD) simulations to compare the allosteric responses of spike variants to LA removal. D-NEMD simulations show that the FA site is coupled to other functional regions of the protein, e.g. the receptor-binding motif (RBM), N-terminal domain (NTD), furin cleavage site, and regions surrounding the fusion peptide. D-NEMD simulations also identify the allosteric networks connecting the FA site to these functional regions. The comparison between the wild-type spike and four variants (Alpha, Delta, Delta plus, and Omicron BA.1) shows that the variants differ significantly in their responses to LA removal. The allosteric connections to the FA site on Alpha are generally similar to those on the wild-type protein, with the exception of the RBM and the S71-R78 region, which show a weaker link to the FA site. In contrast, Omicron is the most different variant, exhibiting significant differences in the RBM, NTD, V622-L629, and furin cleavage site. These differences in the allosteric modulation may be of functional relevance, potentially affecting transmissibility and virulence. Experimental comparison of the effects of LA on SARS-CoV-2 variants, including emerging variants, is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型刺突变体对亚油酸的变构反应不同。
严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型刺突蛋白含有一个功能重要的脂肪酸(FA)结合位点,该位点也存在于其他一些冠状病毒中,如严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒和MERS-CoV。亚油酸(LA)对FA位点的占据通过将刺突“锁定”在传染性较低的构象中来降低传染性。在这里,我们使用动力学非平衡分子动力学(D-NEMD)模拟来比较刺突变体对LA去除的变构反应。D-NEMD模拟显示FA位点与蛋白质的其他功能区偶联,例如受体结合基序(RBM)、N-末端结构域(NTD)、弗林蛋白酶切割位点和融合肽周围的区域。D-NEMD模拟还确定了将FA位点连接到这些功能区的变构网络。野生型刺突与四种变体(阿尔法、德尔塔、德尔塔+和奥密克戎BA.1)之间的比较表明,这些变体对LA去除的反应显著不同。除RBM和S71-R78区域外,与阿尔法上FA位点的变构连接通常与野生型蛋白上的变构类似,它们显示出与FA位点的较弱连接。相反,奥密克戎是最不同的变体,在RBM、NTD、V622-L629和弗林蛋白酶切割位点表现出显著差异。变构调节的这些差异可能具有功能相关性,可能影响传播性和毒力。有必要对LA对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型变异株(包括新出现的变异株)的影响进行实验比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1383
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Cell Biology ( JMCB ) is a full open access, peer-reviewed online journal interested in inter-disciplinary studies at the cross-sections between molecular and cell biology as well as other disciplines of life sciences. The broad scope of JMCB reflects the merging of these life science disciplines such as stem cell research, signaling, genetics, epigenetics, genomics, development, immunology, cancer biology, molecular pathogenesis, neuroscience, and systems biology. The journal will publish primary research papers with findings of unusual significance and broad scientific interest. Review articles, letters and commentary on timely issues are also welcome. JMCB features an outstanding Editorial Board, which will serve as scientific advisors to the journal and provide strategic guidance for the development of the journal. By selecting only the best papers for publication, JMCB will provide a first rate publishing forum for scientists all over the world.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信