MICEAL Black and Latinx Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccination: A Mixed-Methods Examination.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fernanda L Cross, Lydia Wileden, Ayse G Buyuktur, Jodyn Platt, Jeffrey D Morenoff, Jasmin Aramburu, Maria Militzer, Ana Patricia Esqueda, Pranati Movva, Ziyu Zhao, Kashmira Sawant, Felix Valbuena, Sarah Bailey, Barbara Israel, Erica E Marsh, Susan J Woolford
{"title":"MICEAL Black and Latinx Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccination: A Mixed-Methods Examination.","authors":"Fernanda L Cross, Lydia Wileden, Ayse G Buyuktur, Jodyn Platt, Jeffrey D Morenoff, Jasmin Aramburu, Maria Militzer, Ana Patricia Esqueda, Pranati Movva, Ziyu Zhao, Kashmira Sawant, Felix Valbuena, Sarah Bailey, Barbara Israel, Erica E Marsh, Susan J Woolford","doi":"10.1007/s40615-023-01815-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the differences and similarities in perceptions and attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccination among Black and Latinx Michiganders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a convergent mixed-methods approach, forty interviews were conducted with 24 Black and 16 Latinx community members between December 2020 and June 2021 across four Michigan counties disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Survey data were collected from a representative sample of 1598 individuals living in Detroit between January and March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy was a more prevalent theme among Black interview participants than Latinx participants. Trust in experts and vaccine access were significantly more influential in the decision to vaccinate for Latinx residents compared to Black residents. Latinx individuals reported greater intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine compared to Black respondents. Multinomial logit models revealed that 30% of Black participants expressed hesitancy about the COVID-19 vaccine compared to 10% of Latinx respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This study provides a deeper understanding of key differences and similarities in vaccine acceptance/hesitancy across race/ethnicity. The findings can enhance health interventions and outcomes by informing the development of culturally responsive practices tailored to specific communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":"3645-3657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01815-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the differences and similarities in perceptions and attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccination among Black and Latinx Michiganders.

Methods: Utilizing a convergent mixed-methods approach, forty interviews were conducted with 24 Black and 16 Latinx community members between December 2020 and June 2021 across four Michigan counties disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Survey data were collected from a representative sample of 1598 individuals living in Detroit between January and March 2021.

Results: Vaccine hesitancy was a more prevalent theme among Black interview participants than Latinx participants. Trust in experts and vaccine access were significantly more influential in the decision to vaccinate for Latinx residents compared to Black residents. Latinx individuals reported greater intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine compared to Black respondents. Multinomial logit models revealed that 30% of Black participants expressed hesitancy about the COVID-19 vaccine compared to 10% of Latinx respondents.

Conclusions and implications: This study provides a deeper understanding of key differences and similarities in vaccine acceptance/hesitancy across race/ethnicity. The findings can enhance health interventions and outcomes by informing the development of culturally responsive practices tailored to specific communities.

Abstract Image

MICEAL黑人和拉丁裔对新冠肺炎疫苗接种的看法:混合方法检查。
目的:描述密歇根州黑人和拉丁裔人对新冠肺炎疫苗接种的看法和态度的差异和相似性。方法:利用融合混合方法,在2020年12月至2021年6月期间,对受新冠肺炎影响过大的密歇根州四个县的24名黑人和16名拉丁裔社区成员进行了40次采访。调查数据是从2021年1月至3月期间居住在底特律的1598人的代表性样本中收集的。结果:在黑人采访参与者中,疫苗犹豫比拉丁裔参与者更普遍。与黑人居民相比,对专家的信任和疫苗获取对拉丁裔居民接种疫苗的决定影响更大。拉丁裔受访者报告称,与黑人受访者相比,他们更倾向于接种新冠肺炎疫苗。多项logit模型显示,30%的黑人参与者对新冠肺炎疫苗表示犹豫,而拉丁裔受访者的这一比例为10%。结论和意义:这项研究深入了解了不同种族/民族在疫苗接受/犹豫方面的关键差异和相似性。研究结果可以通过为制定针对特定社区的文化响应实践提供信息,来加强卫生干预措施和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信