Field-scale evaluation of struvite phosphorus and nitrogen leaching relative to monoammonium phosphate

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Patricia Leon, Yuhei Nakayama, Andrew J. Margenot
{"title":"Field-scale evaluation of struvite phosphorus and nitrogen leaching relative to monoammonium phosphate","authors":"Patricia Leon,&nbsp;Yuhei Nakayama,&nbsp;Andrew J. Margenot","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Struvite (MgNH<sub>4</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O) is a wastewater-derived phosphorus (P) fertilizer with potential to reduce P as well as nitrogen (N) losses due to its low water solubility. To test hypothesized lower P and N losses from struvite relative to monoammonium phosphate (MAP), field experiments with a randomized-complete block design were conducted in central (Urbana) Illinois on an Endoaquoll-Argiudoll complex and in southern (Ewing) Illinois on a Fragiudalf-Hapludalf complex. Fertilizer was broadcast applied in the fall prior to spring planting of soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) at a maintenance rate of 29.5 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> (Urbana) and 22.0 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> (Ewing). In the spring, soil extractable N and Mehlich 3-P at 0- to 15-cm and 15- to 35-cm depths were determined, and leached N and P were estimated using fall-installed ion-exchangeable resin (IER) lysimeters. At Urbana, soil extractable nitrate-N was higher under MAP than struvite at 0- to 15-cm depth. At Ewing, soil Mehlich 3-P under struvite was lower than MAP at both depths. At Urbana, leached P was 10-fold lower, and leached N was twofold lower under struvite than MAP. Soybean yields were similar between MAP and struvite at Urbana (4.1–4.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and Ewing (3.2–3.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>), but at Ewing yields were 23% higher under struvite compared to the P-unfertilized control. Off-season yield-scaled P and N losses under struvite were lower than MAP by 51% at Urbana and by 10% at Ewing. Our results support the hypothesized potential of struvite to reduce nutrient losses while meeting crop P needs. Additionally, we identify disproportionally greater reductions in N leaching and yield-scaled N losses by substituting struvite for MAP in fall applications, indicating that struvite can offer greater relative benefits for N loss reduction than P loss reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.20522","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Struvite (MgNH4PO4·6H2O) is a wastewater-derived phosphorus (P) fertilizer with potential to reduce P as well as nitrogen (N) losses due to its low water solubility. To test hypothesized lower P and N losses from struvite relative to monoammonium phosphate (MAP), field experiments with a randomized-complete block design were conducted in central (Urbana) Illinois on an Endoaquoll-Argiudoll complex and in southern (Ewing) Illinois on a Fragiudalf-Hapludalf complex. Fertilizer was broadcast applied in the fall prior to spring planting of soybean (Glycine max L.) at a maintenance rate of 29.5 kg P ha−1 (Urbana) and 22.0 kg P ha−1 (Ewing). In the spring, soil extractable N and Mehlich 3-P at 0- to 15-cm and 15- to 35-cm depths were determined, and leached N and P were estimated using fall-installed ion-exchangeable resin (IER) lysimeters. At Urbana, soil extractable nitrate-N was higher under MAP than struvite at 0- to 15-cm depth. At Ewing, soil Mehlich 3-P under struvite was lower than MAP at both depths. At Urbana, leached P was 10-fold lower, and leached N was twofold lower under struvite than MAP. Soybean yields were similar between MAP and struvite at Urbana (4.1–4.3 Mg ha−1) and Ewing (3.2–3.5 Mg ha−1), but at Ewing yields were 23% higher under struvite compared to the P-unfertilized control. Off-season yield-scaled P and N losses under struvite were lower than MAP by 51% at Urbana and by 10% at Ewing. Our results support the hypothesized potential of struvite to reduce nutrient losses while meeting crop P needs. Additionally, we identify disproportionally greater reductions in N leaching and yield-scaled N losses by substituting struvite for MAP in fall applications, indicating that struvite can offer greater relative benefits for N loss reduction than P loss reduction.

鸟粪石磷和氮相对于磷酸一铵的浸出潜力的田间规模评估。
Struite(MgNH4 PO4·6H2 O)是一种废水衍生的磷(P)肥料,由于其低水溶性,有可能减少磷和氮(N)的损失。为了测试鸟粪石相对于磷酸一铵(MAP)较低的磷和氮损失,在两个位置进行了随机完全区组设计的现场实验,分别在Endoaquoll Argiudoll复合物(伊利诺伊州Urbana)和Fragiudalf Hapludalf复合物(伊利诺斯州Ewing)上进行。在春季种植大豆(Glycine max L.)之前的秋季进行施肥,维持率为29.5 kg P ha-1(Urbana)和22.0 kg P ha-(Ewing)。在春季,测定了0-15和15-35cm深度的土壤可提取N和Mehlich 3-P,并使用秋季安装的离子交换树脂(IER)测渗仪估算了浸出的N和P。在Urbana,在0-15cm深度,MAP下的土壤可提取硝酸盐-N高于鸟粪石。在尤因,鸟粪石下的土壤Mehlich 3-P在两个深度都低于MAP。在Urbana,鸟粪石下的浸出磷比MAP低10倍,浸出氮比MAP低2倍。Urbana(4.1-4.3 Mg ha-1)和Ewing(3.2-3.5 Mg ha-2)的MAP和鸟粪石之间的大豆产量相似,但与未施肥的对照相比,在Ewing,鸟粪石下的大豆产量高23%。在Urbana和Ewing,鸟粪石下的非季节产量标度P和N损失分别比MAP低51%和10%。我们的研究结果支持了鸟粪石在满足作物磷需求的同时减少营养损失的假设潜力。此外,我们通过在秋季应用中用鸟粪石代替MAP,发现氮浸出和产量规模氮损失的减少不成比例地大,这表明鸟粪石可能比减少磷损失为减少氮损失提供更大的相对效益。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信