Effect of lidocaine, fentanyl, or dexmedetomidine on minimum infusion rate and cardiorespiratory variables in dogs undergoing ketofol total intravenous anesthesia.

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
M Khannejad, M Keramat, H Imani Rastabi, H Naddaf, B Mosallanejad
{"title":"Effect of lidocaine, fentanyl, or dexmedetomidine on minimum infusion rate and cardiorespiratory variables in dogs undergoing ketofol total intravenous anesthesia.","authors":"M Khannejad,&nbsp;M Keramat,&nbsp;H Imani Rastabi,&nbsp;H Naddaf,&nbsp;B Mosallanejad","doi":"10.22099/IJVR.2023.42877.6230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been proposed that dose reduction via co-administration of other agents might ameliorate respiratory depression associated with ketofol.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of adding lidocaine, fentanyl, or dexmedetomidine on the required dose and cardiorespiratory variables in dogs undergoing total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with ketofol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In phase I, twelve dogs (six per each treatment) were induced and maintained with two out of four anesthetic regimens of (1) ketofol (4 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg/min, respectively; KET), (2) ketofol and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg/min, respectively; KLD), (3) ketofol and fentanyl (5 µg/kg and 0.1 µg/kg/min, respectively; KFN), and (4) ketofol and dexmedetomidine (2 µg/kg and 2 mg/kg/h, respectively; KDX) with at least one-week interval. The minimum infusion rate (MIR) of ketofol was determined. In phase II, the other twelve dogs were given the same anesthetic regimens for 60 min with the determined infusion rate of ketofol, and cardiorespiratory variables were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean MIR of ketofol for KET, KLD, KFN, and KDX were 0.35, 0.23, 0.15, and 0.08 mg/kg/min, respectively. In phase II, the times of recovery events were shorter in KFN and KDX than KET and KLD. The heart rate was significantly higher than baseline in KET and KLD, which was also significantly lower than KFN and KDX at several time points. In all treatments, respiratory depression was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the decrease in the dose of ketofol, none of the added drugs attenuated respiratory depression caused by this agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":14629,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of veterinary research","volume":"24 2","pages":"102-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/08/ijvr-24-102.PMC10542873.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22099/IJVR.2023.42877.6230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It has been proposed that dose reduction via co-administration of other agents might ameliorate respiratory depression associated with ketofol.

Aims: The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of adding lidocaine, fentanyl, or dexmedetomidine on the required dose and cardiorespiratory variables in dogs undergoing total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with ketofol.

Methods: In phase I, twelve dogs (six per each treatment) were induced and maintained with two out of four anesthetic regimens of (1) ketofol (4 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg/min, respectively; KET), (2) ketofol and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg/min, respectively; KLD), (3) ketofol and fentanyl (5 µg/kg and 0.1 µg/kg/min, respectively; KFN), and (4) ketofol and dexmedetomidine (2 µg/kg and 2 mg/kg/h, respectively; KDX) with at least one-week interval. The minimum infusion rate (MIR) of ketofol was determined. In phase II, the other twelve dogs were given the same anesthetic regimens for 60 min with the determined infusion rate of ketofol, and cardiorespiratory variables were recorded.

Results: Mean MIR of ketofol for KET, KLD, KFN, and KDX were 0.35, 0.23, 0.15, and 0.08 mg/kg/min, respectively. In phase II, the times of recovery events were shorter in KFN and KDX than KET and KLD. The heart rate was significantly higher than baseline in KET and KLD, which was also significantly lower than KFN and KDX at several time points. In all treatments, respiratory depression was detected.

Conclusion: Despite the decrease in the dose of ketofol, none of the added drugs attenuated respiratory depression caused by this agent.

利多卡因、芬太尼或右美托咪定对接受酮醇全静脉麻醉的狗的最小输注率和心肺变量的影响。
背景:有人提出,通过联合给药其他药物来减少剂量可能会改善酮醇引起的呼吸抑制。目的:本研究旨在评估在接受酮醇全静脉麻醉(TIVA)的狗中添加利多卡因、芬太尼或右美托咪定对所需剂量和心肺变量的影响。方法:在第一阶段,12只狗(每次治疗6只)被诱导并维持四种麻醉方案中的两种:(1)酮醇(分别为4 mg/kg和0.3 mg/kg/min;KET)、(2)酮醇和利多卡因(分别为1.5 mg/kg和0.25 mg/kg/min;KLD)、,和(4)酮醇和右美托咪定(分别为2µg/kg和2 mg/kg/h;KDX),间隔至少一周。测定了酮醇的最小输注率(MIR)。在第二阶段,对其他12只狗采用相同的麻醉方案,持续60分钟,确定酮醇的输注速率,并记录心肺变量。结果:酮醇对KET、KLD、KFN和KDX的平均MIR分别为0.35、0.23、0.15和0.08mg/kg/分钟。在II期,KFN和KDX的恢复事件时间比KET和KLD短。KET和KLD的心率显著高于基线,在几个时间点也显著低于KFN和KDX。在所有治疗中,都检测到呼吸抑制。结论:尽管酮醇的剂量有所减少,但添加的药物均未减轻该药物引起的呼吸抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research(IJVR) is published quarterly in 4 issues. The aims of this journal are to improve and expand knowledge in all veterinary fields. It is an international journal indexed by the Thomson Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), Elsevier, Scopus, CAB International, Veterinary Bulletin and several other international databases. Research papers and reports on a wide range of veterinary topics are published in the journal after being evaluated by expert reviewers.The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the editorial content of the journal—including peer-reviewed manuscripts—and the timing of its publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信