Placental pathology in perinatal asphyxia: a case-control study.

Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare Pub Date : 2023-09-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1186362
Silvia Alongi, Laura Lambicchi, Francesca Moltrasio, Valentina Alice Botto, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Maria Serena Cuttin, Giuseppe Paterlini, Silvia Malguzzi, Anna Locatelli
{"title":"Placental pathology in perinatal asphyxia: a case-control study.","authors":"Silvia Alongi,&nbsp;Laura Lambicchi,&nbsp;Francesca Moltrasio,&nbsp;Valentina Alice Botto,&nbsp;Davide Paolo Bernasconi,&nbsp;Maria Serena Cuttin,&nbsp;Giuseppe Paterlini,&nbsp;Silvia Malguzzi,&nbsp;Anna Locatelli","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1186362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Placentas of term infants with birth asphyxia are reported to have more lesion such as maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) and chorioamnionitis with fetal response (FIR) than those of term infants without birth asphyxia. We compared the placental pathology of asphyxiated newborns, including those who developed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), with non-asphyxiated controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study of placentas from neonates with a gestational age ≥ 35 weeks, a birthweight ≥ 1,800 g, and no malformations. Cases were asphyxiated newborns (defined as those with an umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.0 or base excess ≤ -12 mMol, 10-minute Apgar score ≤ 5, or the need for resuscitation lasting >10 min) from a previous cohort, with (<i>n</i>=32) and without (<i>n</i>=173) diagnosis of HIE. Controls were non-asphyxiated newborns from low-risk l (<i>n</i>= 50) or high-risk (<i>n</i>= 68) pregnancies. Placentas were analyzed according to the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cases had a higher prevalence of nulliparity, BMI>25, thick meconium, abnormal fetal heart monitoring, and acute intrapartum events than controls (<i>p</i><0.001). MVM and FVM were more frequent among non-asphyxiated than asphyxiated newborns (<i>p</i><0.001). There was no significant difference in inflammatory lesions or abnormal umbilical insertion site. Histologic meconium-associated changes (MAC) were observed in asphyxiated newborns only (<i>p</i>= 0.039).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results confirm the role of antepartum and intrapartum risk factors in neonatal asphyxia and HIE. No association between neonatal asphyxia and placental lesions was found, except for in the case of MAC. The association between clinical and placental data is crucial to understanding and possibly preventing perinatal asphyxia in subsequent pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1186362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Placentas of term infants with birth asphyxia are reported to have more lesion such as maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) and chorioamnionitis with fetal response (FIR) than those of term infants without birth asphyxia. We compared the placental pathology of asphyxiated newborns, including those who developed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), with non-asphyxiated controls.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of placentas from neonates with a gestational age ≥ 35 weeks, a birthweight ≥ 1,800 g, and no malformations. Cases were asphyxiated newborns (defined as those with an umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.0 or base excess ≤ -12 mMol, 10-minute Apgar score ≤ 5, or the need for resuscitation lasting >10 min) from a previous cohort, with (n=32) and without (n=173) diagnosis of HIE. Controls were non-asphyxiated newborns from low-risk l (n= 50) or high-risk (n= 68) pregnancies. Placentas were analyzed according to the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement 2014.

Results: Cases had a higher prevalence of nulliparity, BMI>25, thick meconium, abnormal fetal heart monitoring, and acute intrapartum events than controls (p<0.001). MVM and FVM were more frequent among non-asphyxiated than asphyxiated newborns (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in inflammatory lesions or abnormal umbilical insertion site. Histologic meconium-associated changes (MAC) were observed in asphyxiated newborns only (p= 0.039).

Discussion: Our results confirm the role of antepartum and intrapartum risk factors in neonatal asphyxia and HIE. No association between neonatal asphyxia and placental lesions was found, except for in the case of MAC. The association between clinical and placental data is crucial to understanding and possibly preventing perinatal asphyxia in subsequent pregnancies.

围产期窒息的胎盘病理学:一项病例对照研究。
引言:据报道,与未发生出生窒息的足月儿相比,出生窒息足月儿的胎盘有更多的病变,如母体血管灌注不良(MVM)、胎儿血管灌注异常(FVM)和有胎儿反应的绒毛膜羊膜炎(FIR)。我们比较了窒息新生儿(包括发生缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)的新生儿)与非窒息对照组的胎盘病理。方法:我们对胎龄≥35周、出生体重≥1800g且无畸形的新生儿的胎盘进行了回顾性病例对照研究。病例是来自先前队列的窒息新生儿(定义为脐动脉pH≤7.0或碱过量≤-12mmol,10分钟Apgar评分≤5,或需要持续>10分钟的复苏),有(n=32)和没有(n=173)HIE诊断。对照组为低风险(n=50)或高风险(n=68)妊娠的非窒息新生儿。根据2014年阿姆斯特丹胎盘工作坊小组共识声明对胎盘进行了分析。结果:与对照组相比,病例的无产、BMI>25、胎粪厚、胎心监测异常和产时急性事件的发生率更高(ppp=0.039)。讨论:我们的结果证实了产前和产时危险因素在新生儿窒息和HIE中的作用。除MAC外,未发现新生儿窒息与胎盘病变之间的相关性。临床和胎盘数据之间的关联对于理解并可能预防后续妊娠中的围产期窒息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信