Comparing analgesic efficacy of different local blocks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: author's reply.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ho-Jin Lee
{"title":"Comparing analgesic efficacy of different local blocks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: author's reply.","authors":"Ho-Jin Lee","doi":"10.3344/kjp.23233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We express our gratitude to the authors for their valuable comments on our recent study comparing the analgesic effects of modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through the perichondral approach (M-TAPA) and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) [1]. They have raised several questions concerning the study design and results. First, they addressed concerns regarding our analgesic protocol, which did not involve the routine use of nonopioid analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after surgery. As the authors rightfully mentioned, non-opioid analgesics like acetaminophen and NSAIDs are widely used for postoperative pain management. We administered these non-opioid analgesics intraoperatively, and, considering the short surgery duration, we believe that their effects sufficiently covered postoperative pain during the fasting period (approximately 6 hours). Additionally, for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we followed our institution's standard analgesic protocol by administering 40 mg of intravenous nefopam during the first 8 hours postoperatively. Notably, we recently reported on the opioid-sparing and analgesic effects of intravenous nefopam during thoracic surgery [2]. Moreover, 6 hours post-surgery, when patients' pain had significantly decreased and they resumed oral intake, we administered an oral tramadol/ acetaminophen combination tablet as a rescue analgesic. Second, the authors expressed concerns that our study participants may have received insufficient postoperative pain control based on the pain intensity results. Although we administered non-opioid analgesics and performed nerve blockade in both groups, we observed high pain scores immediately after surgery. It is plausible that the participants' responses to the pain assessment might have influenced these results. According to a recent prospective study on the cutoff pain scores for mild, moderate, and severe pain in adult Korean patients, the cutoff score between mild and moderate pain was 5.5 on the numeric rating scale [3]. Our previous prospective study conducted in a post-anesthesia care unit yielded similar results [4]. Since we did not provide specific guidance beyond the numeric rating scale (with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable), the participants tended to respond with scores closer to the midpoint of 5 when their consciousness was not entirely clear immediately after surgery. Third, the authors highlighted the high occurrence rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) among","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":"36 4","pages":"476-477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/29/kjp-36-4-476.PMC10551400.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.23233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We express our gratitude to the authors for their valuable comments on our recent study comparing the analgesic effects of modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through the perichondral approach (M-TAPA) and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) [1]. They have raised several questions concerning the study design and results. First, they addressed concerns regarding our analgesic protocol, which did not involve the routine use of nonopioid analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after surgery. As the authors rightfully mentioned, non-opioid analgesics like acetaminophen and NSAIDs are widely used for postoperative pain management. We administered these non-opioid analgesics intraoperatively, and, considering the short surgery duration, we believe that their effects sufficiently covered postoperative pain during the fasting period (approximately 6 hours). Additionally, for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we followed our institution's standard analgesic protocol by administering 40 mg of intravenous nefopam during the first 8 hours postoperatively. Notably, we recently reported on the opioid-sparing and analgesic effects of intravenous nefopam during thoracic surgery [2]. Moreover, 6 hours post-surgery, when patients' pain had significantly decreased and they resumed oral intake, we administered an oral tramadol/ acetaminophen combination tablet as a rescue analgesic. Second, the authors expressed concerns that our study participants may have received insufficient postoperative pain control based on the pain intensity results. Although we administered non-opioid analgesics and performed nerve blockade in both groups, we observed high pain scores immediately after surgery. It is plausible that the participants' responses to the pain assessment might have influenced these results. According to a recent prospective study on the cutoff pain scores for mild, moderate, and severe pain in adult Korean patients, the cutoff score between mild and moderate pain was 5.5 on the numeric rating scale [3]. Our previous prospective study conducted in a post-anesthesia care unit yielded similar results [4]. Since we did not provide specific guidance beyond the numeric rating scale (with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable), the participants tended to respond with scores closer to the midpoint of 5 when their consciousness was not entirely clear immediately after surgery. Third, the authors highlighted the high occurrence rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) among
比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术后不同局部阻滞的镇痛效果:作者回复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pain
Korean Journal of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信