Advances in the reconstruction of the spider tree of life: A roadmap for spider systematics and comparative studies.

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Cladistics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1111/cla.12557
Siddharth Kulkarni, Hannah M Wood, Gustavo Hormiga
{"title":"Advances in the reconstruction of the spider tree of life: A roadmap for spider systematics and comparative studies.","authors":"Siddharth Kulkarni, Hannah M Wood, Gustavo Hormiga","doi":"10.1111/cla.12557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last decade and a half, advances in genetic sequencing technologies have revolutionized systematics, transforming the field from studying morphological characters or a few genetic markers, to genomic datasets in the phylogenomic era. A plethora of molecular phylogenetic studies on many taxonomic groups have come about, converging on, or refuting prevailing morphology or legacy-marker-based hypotheses about evolutionary affinities. Spider systematics has been no exception to this transformation and the inter-relationships of several groups have now been studied using genomic data. About 51 500 extant spider species have been described, all with a conservative body plan, but innumerable morphological and behavioural peculiarities. Inferring the spider tree of life using morphological data has been a challenging task. Molecular data have corroborated many hypotheses of higher-level relationships, but also resulted in new groups that refute previous hypotheses. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the reconstruction of the spider tree of life and highlight areas where additional effort is needed with potential solutions. We base this review on the most comprehensive spider phylogeny to date, representing 131 of the 132 spider families. To achieve this sampling, we combined six Sanger-based markers with newly generated and publicly available genome-scale datasets. We find that some inferred relationships between major lineages of spiders (such as Austrochiloidea, Palpimanoidea and Synspermiata) are robust across different classes of data. However, several new hypotheses have emerged with different classes of molecular data. We identify and discuss the robust and controversial hypotheses and compile this blueprint to design future studies targeting systematic revisions of these problematic groups. We offer an evolutionary framework to explore comparative questions such as evolution of venoms, silk, webs, morphological traits and reproductive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50688,"journal":{"name":"Cladistics","volume":" ","pages":"479-532"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cladistics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last decade and a half, advances in genetic sequencing technologies have revolutionized systematics, transforming the field from studying morphological characters or a few genetic markers, to genomic datasets in the phylogenomic era. A plethora of molecular phylogenetic studies on many taxonomic groups have come about, converging on, or refuting prevailing morphology or legacy-marker-based hypotheses about evolutionary affinities. Spider systematics has been no exception to this transformation and the inter-relationships of several groups have now been studied using genomic data. About 51 500 extant spider species have been described, all with a conservative body plan, but innumerable morphological and behavioural peculiarities. Inferring the spider tree of life using morphological data has been a challenging task. Molecular data have corroborated many hypotheses of higher-level relationships, but also resulted in new groups that refute previous hypotheses. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the reconstruction of the spider tree of life and highlight areas where additional effort is needed with potential solutions. We base this review on the most comprehensive spider phylogeny to date, representing 131 of the 132 spider families. To achieve this sampling, we combined six Sanger-based markers with newly generated and publicly available genome-scale datasets. We find that some inferred relationships between major lineages of spiders (such as Austrochiloidea, Palpimanoidea and Synspermiata) are robust across different classes of data. However, several new hypotheses have emerged with different classes of molecular data. We identify and discuss the robust and controversial hypotheses and compile this blueprint to design future studies targeting systematic revisions of these problematic groups. We offer an evolutionary framework to explore comparative questions such as evolution of venoms, silk, webs, morphological traits and reproductive strategies.

蜘蛛生命树重建进展:蜘蛛系统学和比较研究的路线图。
在过去的十五年里,基因测序技术的进步彻底改变了系统学,将研究形态学特征或一些遗传标记的领域转变为系统发育时代的基因组数据集。对许多分类群进行了大量的分子系统发育研究,汇集或反驳了流行的形态学或基于遗留标记的进化亲缘关系假说。蜘蛛系统学也不例外,现在已经使用基因组数据研究了几个群体的相互关系。约51 已经描述了500种现存的蜘蛛,它们都有保守的体型,但有无数的形态和行为特征。利用形态学数据推断蜘蛛的生命树一直是一项具有挑战性的任务。分子数据证实了许多关于更高层次关系的假设,但也产生了反驳先前假设的新群体。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了重建蜘蛛生命树的最新进展,并强调了需要额外努力和潜在解决方案的领域。这篇综述是基于迄今为止最全面的蜘蛛系统发育,代表132个蜘蛛科中的131个。为了实现这种采样,我们将六个基于Sanger的标记与新生成的公开可用的基因组规模数据集相结合。我们发现,在不同类别的数据中,蜘蛛的主要谱系(如Austrochiloidea、Palpimanidea和Synspemata)之间的一些推断关系是稳健的。然而,随着不同类别的分子数据,出现了几个新的假设。我们确定并讨论了稳健和有争议的假设,并编制了这份蓝图,以设计未来针对这些问题群体的系统修正研究。我们提供了一个进化框架来探索比较问题,如毒液、丝、网的进化、形态特征和繁殖策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cladistics
Cladistics 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Cladistics publishes high quality research papers on systematics, encouraging debate on all aspects of the field, from philosophy, theory and methodology to empirical studies and applications in biogeography, coevolution, conservation biology, ontogeny, genomics and paleontology. Cladistics is read by scientists working in the research fields of evolution, systematics and integrative biology and enjoys a consistently high position in the ISI® rankings for evolutionary biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信