Jian ZHAO, Yu Lin SHI, Yu Tong WANG, Fei Ling AI, Xue Wei WANG, Wen Yi YANG, Jing Xin WANG, Li Mei AI, Kui Ru HU, Xia WAN
{"title":"Lung Cancer Risk Attributable to Active Smoking in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Jian ZHAO, Yu Lin SHI, Yu Tong WANG, Fei Ling AI, Xue Wei WANG, Wen Yi YANG, Jing Xin WANG, Li Mei AI, Kui Ru HU, Xia WAN","doi":"10.3967/bes2023.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>No consensus exists on the relative risk (<em>RR</em>) of lung cancer (LC) attributable to active smoking in China. This study aimed to evaluate the unified <em>RR</em> of LC attributable to active smoking among the Chinese population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search of seven databases was conducted to identify studies reporting active smoking among smokers <em>versus</em> nonsmokers in China. Primary articles on LC providing risk estimates with their 95% confidence intervals (<em>CI</em>s) for “ever” “former” or “current” smokers from China were selected. Meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled <em>RR</em> of active smoking.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-four unique studies were included. Compared with that of nonsmokers, the pooled <em>RR</em> (95% <em>CI</em>) for “ever” “former” and “current” smokers were 3.26 (2.79–3.82), 2.95 (1.71–5.08), and 5.16 (2.58–10.34) among men, 3.18 (2.78–3.63), 2.70 (2.08–3.51), and 4.27 (3.61–5.06) among women, and 2.71 (2.12–3.46), 2.66 (2.45–2.88), and 4.21 (3.25–5.45) in both sexes combined, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The <em>RR</em> of LC has remained relatively stable (range, 2–6) over the past four decades in China. Early quitting of smoking could reduce the <em>RR</em> to some extent; however, completely refraining from smoking is the best way to avoid its adverse effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55364,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Environmental Sciences","volume":"36 9","pages":"Pages 850-861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895398823001368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
No consensus exists on the relative risk (RR) of lung cancer (LC) attributable to active smoking in China. This study aimed to evaluate the unified RR of LC attributable to active smoking among the Chinese population.
Methods
A systematic literature search of seven databases was conducted to identify studies reporting active smoking among smokers versus nonsmokers in China. Primary articles on LC providing risk estimates with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for “ever” “former” or “current” smokers from China were selected. Meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled RR of active smoking.
Results
Forty-four unique studies were included. Compared with that of nonsmokers, the pooled RR (95% CI) for “ever” “former” and “current” smokers were 3.26 (2.79–3.82), 2.95 (1.71–5.08), and 5.16 (2.58–10.34) among men, 3.18 (2.78–3.63), 2.70 (2.08–3.51), and 4.27 (3.61–5.06) among women, and 2.71 (2.12–3.46), 2.66 (2.45–2.88), and 4.21 (3.25–5.45) in both sexes combined, respectively.
Conclusion
The RR of LC has remained relatively stable (range, 2–6) over the past four decades in China. Early quitting of smoking could reduce the RR to some extent; however, completely refraining from smoking is the best way to avoid its adverse effects.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences (BES) is a peer-reviewed journal jointly established by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) and the Coulston International Corporation (CIC), USA in 1988, and is published monthly by Elsevier. It is indexed by SCI, PubMed, and CA.
Topics covered by BES include infectious disease prevention, chronic and non-communicable disease prevention, disease control based on preventive medicine, and public health theories. It also focuses on the health impacts of environmental factors in people''s daily lives and work, including air quality, occupational hazards, and radiation hazards.
Article types considered for publication include original articles, letters to the editor, reviews, research highlights, and policy forum.