[Simulation in medical education in Iceland].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elsa Valsdottir, Hans Haraldsson, Asta Bryndís Schram, Peter Dieckmann
{"title":"[Simulation in medical education in Iceland].","authors":"Elsa Valsdottir,&nbsp;Hans Haraldsson,&nbsp;Asta Bryndís Schram,&nbsp;Peter Dieckmann","doi":"10.17992/lbl.2023.10.761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skills labs and simulation centers have become an integrated part of teaching methods in many medical schools. This study aims to describe the status of simulation in medical education in Iceland by examining student and faculty experience, facilitating and barring factors for its use in teaching and how the concept appears in the Course Catalog.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was threefold. In parts one and two, electronic surveys were sent to students and faculty members at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland. Part three was a key word search in the University´s course catalogue relating to simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate for both student and faculty surveys was 65%. Simulation as a teaching method was reported for 10% of faculty according to students but approximately a third of faculty, according to faculty. Attitudes of students and faculty were positive. Faculty, previously exposed to simulation, were more likely to use simulation, as were those who had received training in educational methods. Main barriers identified were lack of facilities, equipment, funds, and training. Key words related to simulation appeared rarely in the University Course Catalogue.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Student and faculty experience with simulation is limited, less than third of faculty claim to have used simulation when teaching medical students. Barring factors in Iceland are similar to what has been reported elsewhere. Lack of words describing simulation in the Course Catalog may raise questions about emphasis on teaching methods or lack thereof. Potential ways to increase the use of simulation could be to improve infrastructure and offer training in diverse educational methods, including simulation, to selected faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":49924,"journal":{"name":"Laeknabladid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laeknabladid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2023.10.761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skills labs and simulation centers have become an integrated part of teaching methods in many medical schools. This study aims to describe the status of simulation in medical education in Iceland by examining student and faculty experience, facilitating and barring factors for its use in teaching and how the concept appears in the Course Catalog.

Materials and methods: The study was threefold. In parts one and two, electronic surveys were sent to students and faculty members at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland. Part three was a key word search in the University´s course catalogue relating to simulation.

Results: Response rate for both student and faculty surveys was 65%. Simulation as a teaching method was reported for 10% of faculty according to students but approximately a third of faculty, according to faculty. Attitudes of students and faculty were positive. Faculty, previously exposed to simulation, were more likely to use simulation, as were those who had received training in educational methods. Main barriers identified were lack of facilities, equipment, funds, and training. Key words related to simulation appeared rarely in the University Course Catalogue.

Conclusion: Student and faculty experience with simulation is limited, less than third of faculty claim to have used simulation when teaching medical students. Barring factors in Iceland are similar to what has been reported elsewhere. Lack of words describing simulation in the Course Catalog may raise questions about emphasis on teaching methods or lack thereof. Potential ways to increase the use of simulation could be to improve infrastructure and offer training in diverse educational methods, including simulation, to selected faculty.

[冰岛医学教育模拟]。
背景:技能实验室和模拟中心已经成为许多医学院教学方法的一个组成部分。本研究旨在通过考察学生和教师的经验、在教学中使用模拟的促进因素和阻碍因素,以及该概念如何出现在课程目录中,来描述模拟在冰岛医学教育中的地位。材料和方法:本研究分为三个方面。在第一部分和第二部分中,向冰岛大学医学院的学生和教职员工发送了电子调查。第三部分是大学模拟课程目录中的关键词检索。结果:学生和教师调查的回复率均为65%。据报道,模拟作为一种教学方法,有10%的教师根据学生的说法,但大约有三分之一的教师根据教师的说法。学生和教职员工的态度都是积极的。以前接触过模拟的教师更有可能使用模拟,接受过教育方法培训的教师也是如此。发现的主要障碍是缺乏设施、设备、资金和培训。与模拟相关的关键词很少出现在《大学课程目录》中。结论:学生和教师在模拟方面的经验有限,只有不到三分之一的教师声称在教授医学生时使用过模拟。冰岛的障碍因素与其他地方报道的情况相似。课程目录中缺乏描述模拟的词语可能会引发对教学方法的重视或缺乏的问题。增加模拟使用的潜在方法可能是改善基础设施,并为选定的教师提供包括模拟在内的多种教育方法的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laeknabladid
Laeknabladid MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Læknablaðið er fræðirit sem birtir vísinda og yfirlitsgreinar og annað efni sem byggir á rannsóknum innan læknisfræði eða skyldra greina. Læknablaðið er gefið út af Læknafélagi Íslands. Blaðið er sent til allra félagsmanna. Það var fyrst gefið út árið 1904 en hefur komið samfellt út frá árinu 1915. Blaðið kemur út 11 sinnum á ári og er prentað í 2000 eintökum. Allt efni Læknablaðsins frá árinu 2000 er aðgengilegt á heimasíðu blaðsins á laeknabladid.is og er aðgangur endurgjaldslaus og öllum opinn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信