Provider Perceptions of Facilitators of and Barriers to Implementation of the Zika Contraception Access Network: A Qualitative Evaluation.

Puerto Rico health sciences journal Pub Date : 2023-09-01
Edna Acosta-Pérez, Eva Lathrop, Samaris Vega, Lauren B Zapata, Zipatly Mendoza, Xavier Huertas-Pagán, Stacey Hurst, Rachel Powell, Lisa Romero
{"title":"Provider Perceptions of Facilitators of and Barriers to Implementation of the Zika Contraception Access Network: A Qualitative Evaluation.","authors":"Edna Acosta-Pérez,&nbsp;Eva Lathrop,&nbsp;Samaris Vega,&nbsp;Lauren B Zapata,&nbsp;Zipatly Mendoza,&nbsp;Xavier Huertas-Pagán,&nbsp;Stacey Hurst,&nbsp;Rachel Powell,&nbsp;Lisa Romero","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>From May 2016 through September 2017, the Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) program increased access to contraception during the Zika virus outbreak in Puerto Rico by providing no-cost client-centered contraceptive counseling and (same-day) access to the full range of US Food and Drug Administration-approved reversible contraceptives to women desirous of not becoming pregnant. The purpose of this study was to identify areas for programmatic improvement and enhance the sustainability of services from the perspectives of participating Z-CAN physicians and other staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April through July 2017, 49 in-depth key-informant interviews were conducted with Z-CAN physicians and clinic staff. Twenty-five clinics participating in the Z-CAN program were selected through a cluster randomization process. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to explore the participants' perceptions of the Z-CAN program and examine facilitators of and barriers to said implementation. A thematic analysis of the emerging topics was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis encountered 4 common overarching themes: facilitators of the Z-CAN program; barriers to Z-CAN implementation; the perceived impact of Z-CAN on providers and communities; and the sustainability of contraception access after the Z-CAN program ended. The key findings were that provider training, mentor support, and communication campaigns facilitated program implementation and that delays in the acquisition and distribution of contraceptives were obstacles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lessons learned from the implementation of Z-CAN from the perspective of physicians and other staff can be used to work towards sustainable contraceptive services in Puerto Rico and inform other contraception-access programs' design and implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94183,"journal":{"name":"Puerto Rico health sciences journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513734/pdf/nihms-1930192.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Puerto Rico health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: From May 2016 through September 2017, the Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) program increased access to contraception during the Zika virus outbreak in Puerto Rico by providing no-cost client-centered contraceptive counseling and (same-day) access to the full range of US Food and Drug Administration-approved reversible contraceptives to women desirous of not becoming pregnant. The purpose of this study was to identify areas for programmatic improvement and enhance the sustainability of services from the perspectives of participating Z-CAN physicians and other staff.

Methods: From April through July 2017, 49 in-depth key-informant interviews were conducted with Z-CAN physicians and clinic staff. Twenty-five clinics participating in the Z-CAN program were selected through a cluster randomization process. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to explore the participants' perceptions of the Z-CAN program and examine facilitators of and barriers to said implementation. A thematic analysis of the emerging topics was conducted.

Results: Our analysis encountered 4 common overarching themes: facilitators of the Z-CAN program; barriers to Z-CAN implementation; the perceived impact of Z-CAN on providers and communities; and the sustainability of contraception access after the Z-CAN program ended. The key findings were that provider training, mentor support, and communication campaigns facilitated program implementation and that delays in the acquisition and distribution of contraceptives were obstacles.

Conclusion: Lessons learned from the implementation of Z-CAN from the perspective of physicians and other staff can be used to work towards sustainable contraceptive services in Puerto Rico and inform other contraception-access programs' design and implementation strategies.

提供者对寨卡避孕普及网络实施推动者和障碍的看法:定性评估。
目标:从2016年5月到2017年9月,寨卡避孕网络(Z-CAN)计划在波多黎各寨卡病毒爆发期间增加了避孕的机会,为不想怀孕的女性提供了以客户为中心的免费避孕咨询,并(当天)获得了美国食品和药物管理局批准的全套可逆避孕药具。本研究的目的是从参与Z-CAN的医生和其他工作人员的角度确定计划改进的领域,并提高服务的可持续性。方法:从2017年4月到7月,对Z-CAN的医生和诊所工作人员进行了49次深入的关键信息者访谈。通过聚类随机化过程选择了25家参与Z-CAN计划的诊所。制定了一份半结构化访谈指南,以探讨参与者对Z-CAN计划的看法,并检查上述实施的推动者和障碍。对新出现的专题进行了专题分析。结果:我们的分析遇到了4个共同的总体主题:Z-CAN计划的推动者;Z-CAN实施的障碍;Z-CAN对供应商和社区的感知影响;以及Z-CAN计划结束后避孕途径的可持续性。关键发现是,提供者培训、导师支持和宣传活动促进了计划的实施,避孕药具的获取和分发延迟是障碍。结论:从医生和其他工作人员的角度来看,从实施Z-CAN中吸取的经验教训可用于在波多黎各实现可持续的避孕服务,并为其他避孕方案的设计和实施策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信