Meta-analysis of primary care delivered buprenorphine treatment retention outcomes.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Robert L Cooper, Ryan D Edgerton, Julia Watson, Nicholas Conley, William A Agee, Derek M Wilus, Samuel A MacMaster, Lisa Bell, Parul Patel, Amruta Godbole, Cynthia Bass-Thomas, Aramandla Ramesh, Mohammad Tabatabai
{"title":"Meta-analysis of primary care delivered buprenorphine treatment retention outcomes.","authors":"Robert L Cooper, Ryan D Edgerton, Julia Watson, Nicholas Conley, William A Agee, Derek M Wilus, Samuel A MacMaster, Lisa Bell, Parul Patel, Amruta Godbole, Cynthia Bass-Thomas, Aramandla Ramesh, Mohammad Tabatabai","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2023.2251653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Currently, the capacity to provide buprenorphine treatment (BT) is not sufficient to treat the growing number of people in the United States with opioid use disorder (OUD). We sought to examine participant retention in care rates of primary care delivered BT programs and to describe factors associated with retention/attrition for participants receiving BT in this setting.<i>Objectives:</i> A PRISMA-guided search of various databases was performed to identify the articles focusing on efficacy of BT treatment and OUD.<i>Method:</i> A systematic literature search identified 15 studies examining retention in care in the primary care setting between 2002 and 2020. Random effects meta-regression were used to identify retention rates across studies.<i>Results:</i> Retention rates decreased across time with a mean 0.52 rate at one year. Several factors were found to be related to retention, including: race, use of other drugs, receipt of counseling, and previous treatment with buprenorphine.<i>Conclusions:</i> While we only investigate BT through primary care, our findings indicate retention rates are equivalent to the rates reported in the specialty care literature. More work is needed to examine factors that may impact primary care delivered BT specifically and differentiate participants that may benefit from care delivered in specialty over primary care as well as the converse.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"756-765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2023.2251653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, the capacity to provide buprenorphine treatment (BT) is not sufficient to treat the growing number of people in the United States with opioid use disorder (OUD). We sought to examine participant retention in care rates of primary care delivered BT programs and to describe factors associated with retention/attrition for participants receiving BT in this setting.Objectives: A PRISMA-guided search of various databases was performed to identify the articles focusing on efficacy of BT treatment and OUD.Method: A systematic literature search identified 15 studies examining retention in care in the primary care setting between 2002 and 2020. Random effects meta-regression were used to identify retention rates across studies.Results: Retention rates decreased across time with a mean 0.52 rate at one year. Several factors were found to be related to retention, including: race, use of other drugs, receipt of counseling, and previous treatment with buprenorphine.Conclusions: While we only investigate BT through primary care, our findings indicate retention rates are equivalent to the rates reported in the specialty care literature. More work is needed to examine factors that may impact primary care delivered BT specifically and differentiate participants that may benefit from care delivered in specialty over primary care as well as the converse.

初级保健提供丁丙诺啡治疗保留结果的荟萃分析。
背景:目前,提供丁丙诺啡治疗(BT)的能力不足以治疗美国越来越多的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者。我们试图检查初级保健提供的BT项目的参与者保留率,并描述在这种情况下接受BT的参与者的保留/流失相关因素。目的:在PRISMA的指导下,对各种数据库进行了检索,以确定关注BT治疗和OUD疗效的文章。方法:系统的文献检索确定了2002年至2020年间在初级保健环境中检查护理保留的15项研究。随机效应元回归用于确定各研究的保留率。结果:保留率随着时间的推移而下降,一年的平均保留率为0.52。有几个因素被发现与滞留有关,包括:种族、使用其他药物、接受咨询以及既往丁丙诺啡治疗。结论:虽然我们只通过初级保健调查BT,但我们的研究结果表明,保留率与专科护理文献中报告的保留率相当。需要做更多的工作来检查可能影响BT提供的初级保健的因素,并区分可能从专业护理中受益的参与者与初级保健以及相反的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信