Validation of a Brief Internet-Based Self-Report Measure of Maladaptive Personality and Interpersonal Schema: Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Hyeonseong Kim, Seohyun Jeong, Inae Hwang, Kiyoung Sung, Woori Moon, Min-Sup Shin
{"title":"Validation of a Brief Internet-Based Self-Report Measure of Maladaptive Personality and Interpersonal Schema: Confirmatory Factor Analysis.","authors":"Hyeonseong Kim,&nbsp;Seohyun Jeong,&nbsp;Inae Hwang,&nbsp;Kiyoung Sung,&nbsp;Woori Moon,&nbsp;Min-Sup Shin","doi":"10.2196/48425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing digital mental health interventions mainly focus on the symptoms of specific mental disorders, but do not focus on Maladaptive Personalities and Interpersonal Schemas (MPISs). As an initial step toward considering personalities and schemas in intervention programs, there is a need for the development of tools for measuring core personality traits and interpersonal schemas known to cause psychological discomfort among potential users of digital mental health interventions. Thus, the MPIS was developed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study are to validate the MPIS by comparing 2 models of the MPIS factor structure and to understand the characteristics of the MPIS by assessing its correlations with other measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 234 participants who were using web-based community sites in South Korea, including university students, graduate students, working professionals, and homemakers. All the data were gathered through web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare a single-factor model with a 5-factor model. Reliability and correlation analyses with other scales were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 5-factor model (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>550</sub>=1278.1; Tucker-Lewis index=0.80; comparative fit index=0.81; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.07) was more suitable than the single-factor model (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>560</sub>=2341.5; Tucker-Lewis index=0.52; comparative fit index=0.54; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.11) for measuring maladaptive personality traits and interpersonal relationship patterns. The internal consistency of each factor of the MPIS was good (Cronbach α=.71-.88), and the correlations with existing measures were statistically significant. The MPIS is a validated 35-item tool for measuring 5 essential personality traits and interpersonal schemas in adults aged 18-39 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study introduced the MPIS, a concise and effective questionnaire capable of measuring maladaptive personality traits and interpersonal relationship schemas. Through analysis, the MPIS was shown to reliably assess these psychological constructs and validate them. Its web-based accessibility and reduced item count make it a valuable tool for mental health assessment. Future applications include its integration into digital mental health care services, allowing easy web-based administration and aiding in the classification of psychological therapy programs based on the obtained results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05952063; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05952063.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/48425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Existing digital mental health interventions mainly focus on the symptoms of specific mental disorders, but do not focus on Maladaptive Personalities and Interpersonal Schemas (MPISs). As an initial step toward considering personalities and schemas in intervention programs, there is a need for the development of tools for measuring core personality traits and interpersonal schemas known to cause psychological discomfort among potential users of digital mental health interventions. Thus, the MPIS was developed.

Objective: The objectives of this study are to validate the MPIS by comparing 2 models of the MPIS factor structure and to understand the characteristics of the MPIS by assessing its correlations with other measures.

Methods: Data were collected from 234 participants who were using web-based community sites in South Korea, including university students, graduate students, working professionals, and homemakers. All the data were gathered through web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare a single-factor model with a 5-factor model. Reliability and correlation analyses with other scales were performed.

Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 5-factor model (χ2550=1278.1; Tucker-Lewis index=0.80; comparative fit index=0.81; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.07) was more suitable than the single-factor model (χ2560=2341.5; Tucker-Lewis index=0.52; comparative fit index=0.54; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.11) for measuring maladaptive personality traits and interpersonal relationship patterns. The internal consistency of each factor of the MPIS was good (Cronbach α=.71-.88), and the correlations with existing measures were statistically significant. The MPIS is a validated 35-item tool for measuring 5 essential personality traits and interpersonal schemas in adults aged 18-39 years.

Conclusions: This study introduced the MPIS, a concise and effective questionnaire capable of measuring maladaptive personality traits and interpersonal relationship schemas. Through analysis, the MPIS was shown to reliably assess these psychological constructs and validate them. Its web-based accessibility and reduced item count make it a valuable tool for mental health assessment. Future applications include its integration into digital mental health care services, allowing easy web-based administration and aiding in the classification of psychological therapy programs based on the obtained results.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05952063; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05952063.

基于网络的适应不良人格和人际图式自我报告量表的验证:验证性因素分析。
背景:现有的数字心理健康干预措施主要关注特定心理障碍的症状,但没有关注适应不良人格和人际图式(MPISs)。作为在干预计划中考虑个性和图式的第一步,有必要开发工具来测量已知会在数字心理健康干预的潜在用户中引起心理不适的核心个性特征和人际图式。因此,MPIS应运而生。目的:本研究的目的是通过比较两个MPIS因子结构模型来验证MPIS,并通过评估其与其他指标的相关性来了解MPIS的特征。方法:数据收集自234名使用韩国网络社区网站的参与者,包括大学生、研究生、职场人士和家庭主妇。所有数据都是通过网络调查收集的。验证性因素分析用于比较单因素模型和5因素模型。进行了可靠性和与其他量表的相关性分析。结果:验证性因子分析结果表明,5因子模型(χ2550=1278.1;Tucker Lewis指数=0.80;比较拟合指数=0.81;近似均方根误差=0.07)比单因子模型(σ2560=2341.5;Tucker Louis指数=0.52;比较拟合指数=0.54;近似均方误差=0.11)更适合测量适应不良人格特征和人际关系模式。MPIS各因素的内部一致性良好(Cronbachα=.71-.88),与现有测量的相关性具有统计学意义。MPIS是一个经过验证的35项工具,用于测量18-39岁成年人的5个基本人格特征和人际关系模式。结论:本研究引入了MPIS,这是一种简洁有效的问卷,能够测量适应不良的人格特征和人际关系模式。通过分析,MPIS被证明可以可靠地评估这些心理结构并对其进行验证。其基于网络的可访问性和减少的项目数量使其成为心理健康评估的宝贵工具。未来的应用包括将其集成到数字心理健康护理服务中,允许轻松的基于网络的管理,并根据获得的结果帮助对心理治疗计划进行分类。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05952063;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05952063.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信