[Evaluation of two phenotypic techniques and a commercial multiplex molecular panel for the detection of different carbapenemases].

N Hernando Parreño, A Sampere Martínez
{"title":"[Evaluation of two phenotypic techniques and a commercial multiplex molecular panel for the detection of different carbapenemases].","authors":"N Hernando Parreño, A Sampere Martínez","doi":"10.37201/req/049.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales has increased in recent years and is considered an important public health problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 106 clinical samples were analyzed by different carbapenemase detection techniques: inhibition discs (ID), immunochromatographic test (ICT) and a genotypic method, comparing them with a multiplex RT-PCR as a reference method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, all 3 techniques exceeded 90% sensitivity, although with differences in the performance of some of them by carbapenemase type. DI had low specificity (62%) for OXA-48, while with TIC the sensitivity for NDM-type metallo-beta-lactamase (93%) was slightly lower than for OXA-48 (95%). The best results were obtained with the genotypic technique (100% overall performance).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the lower sensitivity of TICs (especially in NDM carbapenemases) compared to molecular techniques, with the modification of the protocol we managed to increase this sensitivity and, together with the lower price, simplicity and speed, it makes this technique a good screening option.</p>","PeriodicalId":94198,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","volume":" ","pages":"621-624"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10710673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/049.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales has increased in recent years and is considered an important public health problem.

Methods: A total of 106 clinical samples were analyzed by different carbapenemase detection techniques: inhibition discs (ID), immunochromatographic test (ICT) and a genotypic method, comparing them with a multiplex RT-PCR as a reference method.

Results: Overall, all 3 techniques exceeded 90% sensitivity, although with differences in the performance of some of them by carbapenemase type. DI had low specificity (62%) for OXA-48, while with TIC the sensitivity for NDM-type metallo-beta-lactamase (93%) was slightly lower than for OXA-48 (95%). The best results were obtained with the genotypic technique (100% overall performance).

Conclusions: Despite the lower sensitivity of TICs (especially in NDM carbapenemases) compared to molecular techniques, with the modification of the protocol we managed to increase this sensitivity and, together with the lower price, simplicity and speed, it makes this technique a good screening option.

[用于检测不同碳青霉烯酶的两种表型技术和商业多重分子组的评估]。
目的:近年来,产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌的患病率有所上升,被认为是一个重要的公共卫生问题。方法:采用不同的碳青霉烯酶检测技术:抑制盘法(ID)、免疫色谱法(ICT)和基因分型法对106份临床样本进行分析,并与多重RT-PCR作为参考方法进行比较。结果:总的来说,所有3种技术的灵敏度都超过了90%,尽管其中一些技术的性能因碳青霉烯酶类型而异。DI对OXA-48的特异性较低(62%),而TIC对NDM型金属β-内酰胺酶的敏感性(93%)略低于OXA四十八(95%)。基因型技术获得了最好的结果(100%的总体性能)。结论:尽管与分子技术相比,TICs的敏感性较低(尤其是在NDM碳青霉烯酶中),但通过对方案的修改,我们设法提高了这种敏感性,再加上较低的价格、简单性和速度,使该技术成为一个很好的筛选选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信