An Online Mindfulness Intervention for International Students: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2023-06-29 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.9341
Sumeyye Balci, Ann-Marie Küchler, David Daniel Ebert, Harald Baumeister
{"title":"An Online Mindfulness Intervention for International Students: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.","authors":"Sumeyye Balci,&nbsp;Ann-Marie Küchler,&nbsp;David Daniel Ebert,&nbsp;Harald Baumeister","doi":"10.32872/cpe.9341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Student mobility across borders poses challenges to health systems at the university and country levels. International students suffer from stress more than their local peers, however, do not seek help or underutilize existing help offers. Some barriers to help-seeking among international students are insufficient information regarding the health offers, stigma, and language, which might be overcome via culturally adapted internet and mobile-based interventions (IMI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A randomized controlled feasibility trial with a parallel design assessed the feasibility and potential efficacy of an online mindfulness intervention adapted for international university students. Participants were randomized into either an adapted online mindfulness intervention (StudiCareM-E) (IG, n = 20) or a waitlist control group (WL, n = 20). Participants were assessed at baseline (t0) and eight-week post-randomization (t1). The feasibility of StudiCareM-E was evaluated regarding intervention adherence, client satisfaction, and potential negative effects. The potential efficacy of StudiCareM-E was measured by means of the level of mindfulness, perceived stress, depression, anxiety, presenteeism, and wellbeing. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated with regression models on the intention-to-treat (ITT) sample (n = 40), adjusting for the baseline values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' formative feedback suggested improvements in the content of the IMI. There were no crucial negative effects compared to WL. Assessment dropout was 35% (IG: 50%: WL: 20%), and intervention dropout was 60%. StudiCareM-E yielded significant improvements in mindfulness (β = .34), well-being (β = .37), and anxiety (β = -.42) compared to WL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>StudiCareM-E might be used among culturally diverse international student populations to improve their well-being. Future studies might carefully inspect the extent of the adaptation needs of their target group and design their interventions accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"5 2","pages":"e9341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.9341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Student mobility across borders poses challenges to health systems at the university and country levels. International students suffer from stress more than their local peers, however, do not seek help or underutilize existing help offers. Some barriers to help-seeking among international students are insufficient information regarding the health offers, stigma, and language, which might be overcome via culturally adapted internet and mobile-based interventions (IMI).

Method: A randomized controlled feasibility trial with a parallel design assessed the feasibility and potential efficacy of an online mindfulness intervention adapted for international university students. Participants were randomized into either an adapted online mindfulness intervention (StudiCareM-E) (IG, n = 20) or a waitlist control group (WL, n = 20). Participants were assessed at baseline (t0) and eight-week post-randomization (t1). The feasibility of StudiCareM-E was evaluated regarding intervention adherence, client satisfaction, and potential negative effects. The potential efficacy of StudiCareM-E was measured by means of the level of mindfulness, perceived stress, depression, anxiety, presenteeism, and wellbeing. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated with regression models on the intention-to-treat (ITT) sample (n = 40), adjusting for the baseline values.

Results: Participants' formative feedback suggested improvements in the content of the IMI. There were no crucial negative effects compared to WL. Assessment dropout was 35% (IG: 50%: WL: 20%), and intervention dropout was 60%. StudiCareM-E yielded significant improvements in mindfulness (β = .34), well-being (β = .37), and anxiety (β = -.42) compared to WL.

Conclusion: StudiCareM-E might be used among culturally diverse international student populations to improve their well-being. Future studies might carefully inspect the extent of the adaptation needs of their target group and design their interventions accordingly.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

国际学生在线正念干预:随机对照可行性试验。
背景:学生跨境流动对大学和国家一级的卫生系统构成挑战。然而,与当地同龄人相比,国际学生承受的压力更大,他们不寻求帮助,也没有充分利用现有的帮助。在国际学生中寻求帮助的一些障碍是关于健康、污名和语言的信息不足,方法:一项平行设计的随机对照可行性试验评估了适用于国际大学生的在线正念干预的可行性和潜在疗效。参与者被随机分为适应性在线正念干预组(StudiCareM-E)(IG,n=20)或等待名单对照组(WL,n=20)。在基线(t0)和随机化后八周(t1)对参与者进行评估。对StudiCareM-E在干预依从性、客户满意度和潜在负面影响方面的可行性进行了评估。StudiCareM-E的潜在疗效是通过正念、感知压力、抑郁、焦虑、在场感和幸福感的水平来衡量的。疗效结果采用意向治疗(ITT)样本(n=40)的回归模型进行评估,并根据基线值进行调整。结果:参与者的形成性反馈表明IMI的内容有所改进。与WL相比,没有严重的负面影响。评估脱落率为35%(IG:50%:WL:20%),干预脱落率为60%。与WL相比,StudiCareM-E在正念(β=0.34)、幸福感(β=0.37)和焦虑(β=-.42)方面有显著改善。未来的研究可能会仔细检查其目标群体的适应需求程度,并据此设计干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信