A 6-Month Follow-up Study on Adherence and Satisfaction with Lower Limb Prostheses and Orthoses Delivered to Community-Dwelling People in Japan.

IF 1.5
Progress in rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2490/prm.20230034
Tomoko Yamaguchi, Masafumi Kubota, Hiroaki Naruse, Akihiko Matsumine, Osamu Yamamura, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
{"title":"A 6-Month Follow-up Study on Adherence and Satisfaction with Lower Limb Prostheses and Orthoses Delivered to Community-Dwelling People in Japan.","authors":"Tomoko Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Masafumi Kubota,&nbsp;Hiroaki Naruse,&nbsp;Akihiko Matsumine,&nbsp;Osamu Yamamura,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Tsuchiya","doi":"10.2490/prm.20230034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to evaluate adherence and satisfaction with prostheses and orthoses (POs) of the lower extremities delivered to community-dwelling patients and to assess the relationship of adherence and satisfaction with patient background factors, including medical status, physical findings, and level of participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: We conducted a descriptive cohort study. Consecutive patients with disability who applied for lower extremity POs were invited to enroll. The patients' background information was collected at enrolment, and they were asked at 6 months after PO delivery whether they were using their PO as expected prior to its delivery, and, on a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0 - 10), if they were satisfied with their POs. Furthermore, the relationship between usage/satisfaction and the participants' backgrounds was evaluated and the participants' comments regarding their POs were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: This study analyzed the data of 51 participants (mean age, 56.5 ± 19 years). At the 6-month follow-up, 45 participants used POs as much as they had expected before delivery; this group was younger than their counterparts (52.7 versus 69.2 years). The median satisfaction score using the NRS was 8.5. Older participants (r = - 0.33), participants who were able to attach and remove their POs, and those who were independent in locomotion scored lower on satisfaction. Other background factors were not different regarding adherence or satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: This study demonstrated the difficulty in predicting the usage and satisfaction with lower limb POs from users' backgrounds. Producer-user communication, particularly with patients of older age and/or a higher level of participation, may improve adherence and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"20230034"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/62/prm-8-20230034.PMC10520559.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate adherence and satisfaction with prostheses and orthoses (POs) of the lower extremities delivered to community-dwelling patients and to assess the relationship of adherence and satisfaction with patient background factors, including medical status, physical findings, and level of participation.

Methods: : We conducted a descriptive cohort study. Consecutive patients with disability who applied for lower extremity POs were invited to enroll. The patients' background information was collected at enrolment, and they were asked at 6 months after PO delivery whether they were using their PO as expected prior to its delivery, and, on a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0 - 10), if they were satisfied with their POs. Furthermore, the relationship between usage/satisfaction and the participants' backgrounds was evaluated and the participants' comments regarding their POs were summarized.

Results: : This study analyzed the data of 51 participants (mean age, 56.5 ± 19 years). At the 6-month follow-up, 45 participants used POs as much as they had expected before delivery; this group was younger than their counterparts (52.7 versus 69.2 years). The median satisfaction score using the NRS was 8.5. Older participants (r = - 0.33), participants who were able to attach and remove their POs, and those who were independent in locomotion scored lower on satisfaction. Other background factors were not different regarding adherence or satisfaction.

Conclusions: : This study demonstrated the difficulty in predicting the usage and satisfaction with lower limb POs from users' backgrounds. Producer-user communication, particularly with patients of older age and/or a higher level of participation, may improve adherence and satisfaction.

Abstract Image

日本社区居民对下肢假肢和矫形器的依从性和满意度的6个月随访研究。
摘要:引言:我们旨在评估社区患者对假肢和矫形器的依从性和满意度,并评估依从性和满意程度与患者背景因素的关系,包括医疗状况、身体检查结果和参与水平。方法:我们进行了一项描述性队列研究。连续申请下肢POs的残疾患者被邀请参加。在入组时收集患者的背景信息,并在PO交付后6个月询问他们在交付前是否按预期使用PO,以及在数字评分表(NRS,0-10)上,他们是否对PO感到满意。此外,评估了使用/满意度与参与者背景之间的关系,并总结了参与者对其PO的评论。结果:本研究分析了51名参与者(平均年龄56.5±19岁)的数据。在6个月的随访中,45名参与者使用了与他们在分娩前预期的一样多的PO;这组人比他们的同龄人年轻(52.7岁对69.2岁)。使用NRS的中位满意度得分为8.5。年龄较大的参与者(r=-0.33)、能够连接和移除POs的参与者以及在运动方面独立的参与者的满意度得分较低。其他背景因素在依从性或满意度方面没有差异。结论:本研究表明,从使用者的背景预测下肢POs的使用和满意度是困难的。生产者与用户的沟通,特别是与年龄较大和/或参与程度较高的患者的沟通,可以提高依从性和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信