Federal Enforcement of Pharmaceutical Fraud under the False Claims Act, 2006-2022.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Liam Bendicksen, Aaron S Kesselheim, C Joseph Ross Daval
{"title":"Federal Enforcement of Pharmaceutical Fraud under the False Claims Act, 2006-2022.","authors":"Liam Bendicksen, Aaron S Kesselheim, C Joseph Ross Daval","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10989695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The False Claims Act is the US federal government's primary tool for identifying and penalizing pharmaceutical fraud. The Department of Justice uses the False Claims Act to bring civil cases against drug manufacturers that allegedly obtain improper payment from federal programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched the Department of Justice website for press releases published between 2006 and 2022 that announced fraud actions brought against drug companies. They then used the World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Classification index to identify the classes of prescription drugs implicated in fraud actions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During fiscal years 2006-2022, payments by six manufacturers amounted to more than 28% of total payments made as a result of federal False Claims Act actions. Nervous system and cardiovascular drugs were the classes of medications most commonly implicated in alleged fraud. Federal officials most frequently alleged that companies improperly promoted nervous system drugs and paid kickbacks to increase revenues from cardiovascular, antineoplastic and immunomodulating, and alimentary tract and metabolism drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite frequent pharmaceutical fraud settlements and penalties, incidence of alleged fraud among drug companies remains high. Alternative methods for preventing and deterring fraud could help safeguard our health systems and promote public health, and policy makers should ensure that effective fraud enforcement complements preventive public health regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":"249-268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10989695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The False Claims Act is the US federal government's primary tool for identifying and penalizing pharmaceutical fraud. The Department of Justice uses the False Claims Act to bring civil cases against drug manufacturers that allegedly obtain improper payment from federal programs.

Methods: The authors searched the Department of Justice website for press releases published between 2006 and 2022 that announced fraud actions brought against drug companies. They then used the World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Classification index to identify the classes of prescription drugs implicated in fraud actions.

Findings: During fiscal years 2006-2022, payments by six manufacturers amounted to more than 28% of total payments made as a result of federal False Claims Act actions. Nervous system and cardiovascular drugs were the classes of medications most commonly implicated in alleged fraud. Federal officials most frequently alleged that companies improperly promoted nervous system drugs and paid kickbacks to increase revenues from cardiovascular, antineoplastic and immunomodulating, and alimentary tract and metabolism drugs.

Conclusions: Despite frequent pharmaceutical fraud settlements and penalties, incidence of alleged fraud among drug companies remains high. Alternative methods for preventing and deterring fraud could help safeguard our health systems and promote public health, and policy makers should ensure that effective fraud enforcement complements preventive public health regulation.

2006-2022年《虚假索赔法》规定的联邦药品欺诈执法。
背景:《虚假索赔法》是联邦政府识别和惩罚药品欺诈的主要工具。司法部利用《虚假索赔法》对涉嫌从联邦项目中获得不当付款的药品制造商提起民事诉讼。方法:我们在司法部网站上搜索了2006年至2022年间发布的新闻稿,这些新闻稿宣布了针对制药公司的欺诈行为。我们使用世界卫生组织的解剖治疗分类指数确定了与欺诈行为有关的处方药类别。调查结果:在2006财年至2022财年期间,由于司法部的欺诈行为,六家制造商的付款占总付款的28%以上。神经系统和心血管药物是涉嫌欺诈的最常见的药物类别。联邦官员最常指控的是,公司不当推销神经系统药物,并支付回扣,以增加心血管、抗肿瘤和免疫调节以及消化道和代谢药物的收入。结论:尽管药品欺诈的和解和处罚频繁,但制药公司涉嫌欺诈的发生率仍然很高。预防和遏制欺诈的替代方法有助于保护我们的卫生系统和促进公共卫生,政策制定者应确保有效的欺诈执法补充预防性公共卫生监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信