State of the Art of Participatory and User-led Research in Mental Health in Brazil: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2023-04-05 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2023.12
Ana Carolina Florence, Mateus Bocalini, Daniela Cabrini, Rita Tanzi, Melissa Funaro, Gerald Jordan, Larry Davidson, Robert Drake, Cristìan Montenegro, Silvio Yasui
{"title":"State of the Art of Participatory and User-led Research in Mental Health in Brazil: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ana Carolina Florence,&nbsp;Mateus Bocalini,&nbsp;Daniela Cabrini,&nbsp;Rita Tanzi,&nbsp;Melissa Funaro,&nbsp;Gerald Jordan,&nbsp;Larry Davidson,&nbsp;Robert Drake,&nbsp;Cristìan Montenegro,&nbsp;Silvio Yasui","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2023.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Participatory research denotes the engagement and meaningful involvement of the community of interest across multiple stages of investigation, from design to data collection, analysis, and publication. Traditionally, people with first-hand experience of psychiatric diagnoses, services users and those living with a psychosocial disability have been seen objects rather than agents of research and knowledge production. This, despite the ethical and practical benefits of their involvement. The state of the art of knowledge about participatory research in mental health Brazil is poorly understood outside of its local context. The purpose of this article was to conduct a scoping review of participatory and user-led research in mental health in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 20 articles that met eligibility criteria. Participation in research was not treated as separate from participation in shaping mental health policy, driving care, or the broader right to fully participate in societal life and enjoy social and civil rights. Studies identified several obstacles to full participation, including the biomedical model, primacy of academic and scientific knowledge, and systemic barriers. Our extraction, charting, and synthesis yielded four themes: power, knowledge, autonomy, and empowerment.</p><p><strong>Implications of the work: </strong>Participation in this context must address the intersecting vulnerabilities experienced by those who are both Brazilian and labeled as having a mental illness. Participatory research and Global South leadership must foreground local epistemologies that can contribute to the global debate about participation and mental health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7615179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.12","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participatory research denotes the engagement and meaningful involvement of the community of interest across multiple stages of investigation, from design to data collection, analysis, and publication. Traditionally, people with first-hand experience of psychiatric diagnoses, services users and those living with a psychosocial disability have been seen objects rather than agents of research and knowledge production. This, despite the ethical and practical benefits of their involvement. The state of the art of knowledge about participatory research in mental health Brazil is poorly understood outside of its local context. The purpose of this article was to conduct a scoping review of participatory and user-led research in mental health in Brazil.

Findings: We identified 20 articles that met eligibility criteria. Participation in research was not treated as separate from participation in shaping mental health policy, driving care, or the broader right to fully participate in societal life and enjoy social and civil rights. Studies identified several obstacles to full participation, including the biomedical model, primacy of academic and scientific knowledge, and systemic barriers. Our extraction, charting, and synthesis yielded four themes: power, knowledge, autonomy, and empowerment.

Implications of the work: Participation in this context must address the intersecting vulnerabilities experienced by those who are both Brazilian and labeled as having a mental illness. Participatory research and Global South leadership must foreground local epistemologies that can contribute to the global debate about participation and mental health research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

巴西参与式和用户主导的心理健康研究现状:范围界定综述。
背景:参与性研究指的是利益共同体在从设计到数据收集、分析和发布的多个调查阶段的参与和有意义的参与。传统上,对精神病诊断有第一手经验的人、服务使用者和心理残疾患者被视为研究和知识生产的对象,而不是代理人。尽管他们的参与带来了道德和实际利益,但这一点仍然存在。关于巴西心理健康参与性研究的知识现状,在当地背景之外还知之甚少。本文的目的是对巴西参与性和用户主导的心理健康研究进行范围审查。研究结果:我们确定了20篇符合资格标准的文章。参与研究并没有被视为与参与制定心理健康政策、驾驶护理或充分参与社会生活并享有社会和公民权利的更广泛权利分开。研究发现了充分参与的几个障碍,包括生物医学模式、学术和科学知识的首要地位以及系统性障碍。我们的提取、绘制和综合产生了四个主题:权力、知识、自主性和赋权。这项工作的意义:在这方面的参与必须解决那些既是巴西人又被贴上精神疾病标签的人所经历的交叉脆弱性。参与性研究和全球南方领导力必须突出当地的认识论,这些认识论可以促进关于参与和心理健康研究的全球辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信