Determinants of Attitude Toward End-of-Life Care Among Junior Physicians: Findings from a Nationwide Survey in Japan.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2023-09-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0004
Yukiko Watanabe, Natsuki Kawashima, Yu Uneno, Soichiro Okamoto, Manabu Muto, Tatsuya Morita
{"title":"Determinants of Attitude Toward End-of-Life Care Among Junior Physicians: Findings from a Nationwide Survey in Japan.","authors":"Yukiko Watanabe,&nbsp;Natsuki Kawashima,&nbsp;Yu Uneno,&nbsp;Soichiro Okamoto,&nbsp;Manabu Muto,&nbsp;Tatsuya Morita","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians' attitudes can be critical in quality end-of-life care. However, the determinants of the attitudes and whether the attitudes can be modified remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate factors correlated with physicians' positive attitudes toward end-of-life care and whether these attitudes are modifiable through acquired factors (e.g., education or mentorship).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A nationwide survey was conducted in 300 institutions and selected randomly from 1037 clinical training hospitals in Japan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>From each selected institution, two resident physicians of postgraduate year (PGY) 1 or 2 and two clinical fellows from PGY 3-5 were requested to answer the survey.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was the Frommelt Attitudes Toward the Care of the Dying (FATCOD) scale score. Factors (e.g., the respondents' age, sex, number of years of clinical experience, training environment, religion, and beliefs around death) were examined for correlation with FATCOD score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 198 physicians and 134 clinical fellows responded to the survey (response rate: 33.0% and 22.3%, respectively). Factors with the strongest correlation with FATCOD scores were mostly unmodifiable factors (e.g., being female and one's beliefs around death). Modifiable factors were also identified-number of patient deaths experienced, level of interest in palliative care, availability of support from senior mentors, and frequency of consultation with nonphysician medical staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians' attitudes toward end-of-life care correlate more strongly with nonmodifiable factors, but attitudes can be meaningfully improved via mentoring by senior physicians. Future studies are warranted to determine the effective interventions to foster positive attitudes among physicians involved in end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians' attitudes can be critical in quality end-of-life care. However, the determinants of the attitudes and whether the attitudes can be modified remain unclear.

Objectives: To investigate factors correlated with physicians' positive attitudes toward end-of-life care and whether these attitudes are modifiable through acquired factors (e.g., education or mentorship).

Design: A nationwide survey was conducted in 300 institutions and selected randomly from 1037 clinical training hospitals in Japan.

Participants: From each selected institution, two resident physicians of postgraduate year (PGY) 1 or 2 and two clinical fellows from PGY 3-5 were requested to answer the survey.

Measurements: The primary outcome was the Frommelt Attitudes Toward the Care of the Dying (FATCOD) scale score. Factors (e.g., the respondents' age, sex, number of years of clinical experience, training environment, religion, and beliefs around death) were examined for correlation with FATCOD score.

Results: In all, 198 physicians and 134 clinical fellows responded to the survey (response rate: 33.0% and 22.3%, respectively). Factors with the strongest correlation with FATCOD scores were mostly unmodifiable factors (e.g., being female and one's beliefs around death). Modifiable factors were also identified-number of patient deaths experienced, level of interest in palliative care, availability of support from senior mentors, and frequency of consultation with nonphysician medical staff.

Conclusion: Physicians' attitudes toward end-of-life care correlate more strongly with nonmodifiable factors, but attitudes can be meaningfully improved via mentoring by senior physicians. Future studies are warranted to determine the effective interventions to foster positive attitudes among physicians involved in end-of-life care.

Abstract Image

初级医生对临终关怀态度的决定因素:日本全国调查结果。
背景:医生的态度对高质量的临终关怀至关重要。然而,态度的决定因素以及态度是否可以改变仍不清楚。目的:调查与医生对临终关怀的积极态度相关的因素,以及这些态度是否可以通过后天因素(如教育或指导)来改变。设计:在日本1037家临床培训医院中随机抽取300家机构,在全国范围内进行调查。参与者:从每个选定的机构中,两名研究生一年级或二年级的住院医师和两名3-5年级的临床研究员被要求回答调查。测量:主要结果是Frommelt对临终关怀的态度(FATCOD)量表评分。调查了受访者的年龄、性别、临床经验年限、训练环境、宗教和死亡信仰等因素与FATCOD评分的相关性。结果:总共有198名医生和134名临床研究员对调查做出了回应(回应率分别为33.0%和22.3%)。与FATCOD评分相关性最强的因素大多是不可改变的因素(例如,女性和对死亡的信念)。可修改的因素还包括经历的患者死亡人数、对姑息治疗的兴趣程度、高级导师的支持率以及与非物理医务人员的咨询频率。结论:医生对临终关怀的态度与不可改变因素的相关性更强,但通过资深医生的指导,态度可以得到有意义的改善。未来的研究有必要确定有效的干预措施,以培养参与临终关怀的医生的积极态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信