Missed opportunities for integrated testing of HIV and tuberculosis on the GeneXpert platform in Lesotho.

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2132
Gamuchirai P Gwaza, Monkoe Leqheka, Tsietso Mots'oane, Sabine Dittrich, Kekeletso Kao
{"title":"Missed opportunities for integrated testing of HIV and tuberculosis on the GeneXpert platform in Lesotho.","authors":"Gamuchirai P Gwaza, Monkoe Leqheka, Tsietso Mots'oane, Sabine Dittrich, Kekeletso Kao","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated testing, treatment and care are key strategies for addressing the dual burdens of tuberculosis and HIV. The GeneXpert instrument allows simultaneous HIV and tuberculosis testing, but its utilisation for integrated testing remains suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study determined the extent to which tuberculosis testing and HIV early infant detection (EID) were integrated on the GeneXpert platform, or the potential for integration at selected health facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods evaluation was conducted using retrospective secondary data analysis of laboratory records from 2017 to 2019, and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected between January 2020 and March 2020 in Lesotho.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four health staff were interviewed across 13 health facilities: one regional, nine district, and three clinic level. Six were government facilities, six were mission hospitals, and one was a non-profit clinic. All facilities selected had at least one GeneXpert instrument used for tuberculosis or HIV testing; none included simultaneous testing for tuberculosis and HIV. In 2017, the average utilisation rate for the GeneXpert instrument for tuberculosis and EID testing was 63% and 24%, while in 2019, the average utilisation rate was 61% for tuberculosis testing and 27% for EID.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Except for three sites where the testing rates were high, utilisation rates were sufficiently low that all the HIV EID and tuberculosis tests undertaken in 2017 and 2019 could have been performed using only the instruments currently dedicated to tuberculosis testing. There is a missed opportunity for the integration of testing for tuberculosis and HIV on the GeneXpert instrument.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>This study adds to the body of evidence on the need for integration of testing and highlights some practical and technical considerations for successful implementation of integrated tuberculosis and HIV testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrated testing, treatment and care are key strategies for addressing the dual burdens of tuberculosis and HIV. The GeneXpert instrument allows simultaneous HIV and tuberculosis testing, but its utilisation for integrated testing remains suboptimal.

Objective: The study determined the extent to which tuberculosis testing and HIV early infant detection (EID) were integrated on the GeneXpert platform, or the potential for integration at selected health facilities.

Methods: A mixed methods evaluation was conducted using retrospective secondary data analysis of laboratory records from 2017 to 2019, and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected between January 2020 and March 2020 in Lesotho.

Results: Forty-four health staff were interviewed across 13 health facilities: one regional, nine district, and three clinic level. Six were government facilities, six were mission hospitals, and one was a non-profit clinic. All facilities selected had at least one GeneXpert instrument used for tuberculosis or HIV testing; none included simultaneous testing for tuberculosis and HIV. In 2017, the average utilisation rate for the GeneXpert instrument for tuberculosis and EID testing was 63% and 24%, while in 2019, the average utilisation rate was 61% for tuberculosis testing and 27% for EID.

Conclusion: Except for three sites where the testing rates were high, utilisation rates were sufficiently low that all the HIV EID and tuberculosis tests undertaken in 2017 and 2019 could have been performed using only the instruments currently dedicated to tuberculosis testing. There is a missed opportunity for the integration of testing for tuberculosis and HIV on the GeneXpert instrument.

What this study adds: This study adds to the body of evidence on the need for integration of testing and highlights some practical and technical considerations for successful implementation of integrated tuberculosis and HIV testing.

错过了在莱索托GeneXpert平台上进行艾滋病毒和结核病综合检测的机会。
背景:综合检测、治疗和护理是解决结核病和艾滋病毒双重负担的关键战略。GeneXpert仪器允许同时进行艾滋病毒和结核病检测,但其在综合检测中的应用仍然不理想。目的:该研究确定了结核病检测和艾滋病毒早期婴儿检测(EID)在GeneXpert平台上的整合程度,或在选定的卫生设施中整合的潜力。方法:使用2017年至2019年实验室记录的回顾性二次数据分析和半结构化访谈进行混合方法评估。数据是在2020年1月至2020年3月期间在莱索托收集的。结果:采访了13个卫生机构的44名卫生人员:一个地区、九个地区和三个诊所。六个是政府设施,六个是教会医院,一个是非营利性诊所。所有选定的设施都至少有一台GeneXpert仪器用于结核病或艾滋病毒检测;没有一项包括同时进行结核病和艾滋病毒检测。2017年,GeneXpert仪器用于结核病和EID检测的平均使用率分别为63%和24%,而2019年,结核病检测的平均利用率为61%,EID的平均利用度为27%。结论:除了三个检测率较高的地点外,利用率足够低,2017年和2019年进行的所有HIV EID和结核病检测都可以只使用目前专门用于结核病检测的仪器进行。在GeneXpert仪器上整合结核病和艾滋病毒检测的机会已经错过。本研究补充内容:本研究补充了关于整合检测必要性的大量证据,并强调了成功实施结核病和艾滋病毒综合检测的一些实际和技术考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信