Prevalence and Associated Predictors of Inappropriate and Omitted Medications Prescribing in Older Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2023-10-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S430208
Ahmad Al-Azayzih, Enas Bani-Ahmad, Anan S Jarab, Zelal Kharaba, Khalid Al-Kubaisi
{"title":"Prevalence and Associated Predictors of Inappropriate and Omitted Medications Prescribing in Older Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Ahmad Al-Azayzih,&nbsp;Enas Bani-Ahmad,&nbsp;Anan S Jarab,&nbsp;Zelal Kharaba,&nbsp;Khalid Al-Kubaisi","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S430208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>This study aimed to identify the prevalence and significant predictors of both potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potentially omitted medications (POMs) events among geriatric patients with advanced cancer using the STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥65 years who were diagnosed and treated for advanced stage of cancer. Patients' medical charts were evaluated to identify polypharmacy (≥5 medications) prevalence as well as potential PIMs and POMs incidents and their associated predictors. SPSS software was used to perform the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with dependent variables including PIMs use and POMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Electronic medication charts of 510 patients were evaluated. The average age of the patients was 73.25 years, and 264 (51.8%) patients were males. The average number of medications prescribed per patient was 10.3 (range-2-26). Polypharmacy was present in 85.9% of patients, while excessive polypharmacy prevalence was 52.2%. At least one PIM was encountered in 253 patients (49.6%), while at least one POM was encountered in all patients owing to the omission of pneumococcal vaccines. The most common PIMs were opioid analgesics, followed by benzodiazepines, and hypnotics. Additionally, the most omitted medications, excluding vaccinations, were cardiovascular agents and laxatives in patients on regular opioid analgesics. Polypharmacy and diagnosis with solid cancer compared to hematological cancer were associated with increased odds for PIMs occurrence (ORs = 1.293 (p < 0.001) and 3.022 (p = 0.03), respectively), while coexistence of hypertension diagnosis in cancer patients was associated with increased the odds for POMs events (OR = 2.286 (p = 0.007)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polypharmacy, PIMs, and POMs were highly prevalent among older cancer patients based on the polypharmacy definition and STOPP/START Criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/ed/cia-18-1653.PMC10557987.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S430208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims of the study: This study aimed to identify the prevalence and significant predictors of both potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potentially omitted medications (POMs) events among geriatric patients with advanced cancer using the STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥65 years who were diagnosed and treated for advanced stage of cancer. Patients' medical charts were evaluated to identify polypharmacy (≥5 medications) prevalence as well as potential PIMs and POMs incidents and their associated predictors. SPSS software was used to perform the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with dependent variables including PIMs use and POMs.

Results: Electronic medication charts of 510 patients were evaluated. The average age of the patients was 73.25 years, and 264 (51.8%) patients were males. The average number of medications prescribed per patient was 10.3 (range-2-26). Polypharmacy was present in 85.9% of patients, while excessive polypharmacy prevalence was 52.2%. At least one PIM was encountered in 253 patients (49.6%), while at least one POM was encountered in all patients owing to the omission of pneumococcal vaccines. The most common PIMs were opioid analgesics, followed by benzodiazepines, and hypnotics. Additionally, the most omitted medications, excluding vaccinations, were cardiovascular agents and laxatives in patients on regular opioid analgesics. Polypharmacy and diagnosis with solid cancer compared to hematological cancer were associated with increased odds for PIMs occurrence (ORs = 1.293 (p < 0.001) and 3.022 (p = 0.03), respectively), while coexistence of hypertension diagnosis in cancer patients was associated with increased the odds for POMs events (OR = 2.286 (p = 0.007)).

Conclusion: Polypharmacy, PIMs, and POMs were highly prevalent among older cancer patients based on the polypharmacy definition and STOPP/START Criteria.

老年晚期癌症患者用药不当和漏药的患病率和相关预测因素:一项跨部门研究。
研究目的:本研究旨在使用STOPP(老年人处方筛查工具)和START(警告正确治疗的筛查工具)标准,确定晚期癌症老年患者中潜在不适当药物(PIM)和潜在遗漏药物(POM)事件的患病率和重要预测因素。方法:这项回顾性横断面研究包括年龄≥65岁的癌症晚期诊断和治疗患者。对患者的病历进行评估,以确定多药(≥5种药物)的流行率以及潜在的PIM和POM事件及其相关预测因素。采用SPSS软件进行分析。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与因变量相关的因素,包括PIM的使用和POM。结果:对510例患者的电子用药图进行了评价。患者的平均年龄为73.25岁,264名(51.8%)患者为男性。每位患者的平均用药次数为10.3次(范围为-2-26)。85.9%的患者存在多药治疗,而过度多药治疗的患病率为52.2%。253名患者(49.6%)至少出现一例PIM,而由于遗漏肺炎球菌疫苗,所有患者至少出现一种POM。最常见的PIM是阿片类止痛药,其次是苯二氮卓类药物和催眠药。此外,最遗漏的药物,不包括疫苗接种,是服用常规阿片类止痛药的患者的心血管药物和泻药。与血液系统癌症相比,多药治疗和诊断为实体癌症与PIM发生的几率增加相关(ORs=1.293(p<0.001)和3.022(p=0.03)),而癌症患者高血压诊断共存与POM事件的几率增加相关(OR=2.286(p=0.007)),根据多药定义和STOPP/START标准,POM在老年癌症患者中高度流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信