Sex Differences in Process-of-Care and In-Hospital Prognosis Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-25 Epub Date: 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0543
Akira Shikuma, Masahiro Nishi, Satoaki Matoba
{"title":"Sex Differences in Process-of-Care and In-Hospital Prognosis Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Akira Shikuma, Masahiro Nishi, Satoaki Matoba","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited studies have demonstrated sex differences in the clinical outcomes and quality of care among elderly patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using nationwide cardiovascular registry data collected in Japan between 2012 and 2019, we enrolled patients aged ≥45 years. The 30-day and all in-hospital mortality rates, as well as process-of-care measures, were assessed, and mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed. A total 254,608 patients were included and stratified into 3 age groups: middle-aged, old and oldest old. The 30-day mortality rates for females and males were as follows: 3.0% vs. 2.7%, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.17 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.36, P=0.030) in middle-aged patients; 7.2% vs. 5.8%, with an OR of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09-1.21, P<0.001) in old patients; and 19.6% vs. 15.5% with an OR of 1.17 (95% CI: 1.09-1.26, P<0.001) in the oldest old patients. Moreover, significantly higher numbers of female AMI patients across all age groups died in hospital, as well as having fewer invasive procedures and cardiovascular prescriptions, compared with their male counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide cohort study revealed that female middle-aged and elderly patients experienced suboptimal quality of care and poorer in-hospital outcomes following AMI, compared with their male counterparts, highlighting the need for more effective management in consideration of sex-specific factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited studies have demonstrated sex differences in the clinical outcomes and quality of care among elderly patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods and results: Using nationwide cardiovascular registry data collected in Japan between 2012 and 2019, we enrolled patients aged ≥45 years. The 30-day and all in-hospital mortality rates, as well as process-of-care measures, were assessed, and mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed. A total 254,608 patients were included and stratified into 3 age groups: middle-aged, old and oldest old. The 30-day mortality rates for females and males were as follows: 3.0% vs. 2.7%, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.17 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.36, P=0.030) in middle-aged patients; 7.2% vs. 5.8%, with an OR of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09-1.21, P<0.001) in old patients; and 19.6% vs. 15.5% with an OR of 1.17 (95% CI: 1.09-1.26, P<0.001) in the oldest old patients. Moreover, significantly higher numbers of female AMI patients across all age groups died in hospital, as well as having fewer invasive procedures and cardiovascular prescriptions, compared with their male counterparts.

Conclusions: This nationwide cohort study revealed that female middle-aged and elderly patients experienced suboptimal quality of care and poorer in-hospital outcomes following AMI, compared with their male counterparts, highlighting the need for more effective management in consideration of sex-specific factors.

老年急性心肌梗死患者在护理过程和住院预后方面的性别差异。
背景:有限的研究表明,在因急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院的老年患者中,临床结果和护理质量存在性别差异 和 结果:使用2012年至2019年间在日本收集的全国心血管登记数据,我们招募了年龄≥45岁的患者。对30天和所有住院死亡率以及护理措施进行了评估,并进行了混合效应逻辑回归分析。共纳入254608名患者,并将其分为3个年龄组:中年、老年和高龄。女性和男性的30天死亡率如下:3.0%vs.2.7%,中年患者的校正比值比(OR)为1.17(95%置信区间(CI):1.01-1.36,P=0.030);7.2%对5.8%,OR为1.14(95%可信区间:1.09-1.21,P结论:这项全国性队列研究显示,与男性患者相比,女性中老年患者在AMI后的护理质量较差,住院结果较差,这突出表明需要在考虑性别特异性因素的情况下进行更有效的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信