Establishing the acute physiological and sleep disruption characteristics of wind farm versus road traffic noise disturbances in sleep: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Gorica Micic, Branko Zajamsek, Bastien Lechat, Kristy Hansen, Hannah Scott, Barbara Toson, Tessa Liebich, Claire Dunbar, Duc Phuc Nguyen, Felix Decup, Andrew Vakulin, Nicole Lovato, Leon Lack, Colin Hansen, Dorothy Bruck, Ching Li Chai-Coetzer, Jeremy Mercer, Con Doolan, Peter Catcheside
{"title":"Establishing the acute physiological and sleep disruption characteristics of wind farm versus road traffic noise disturbances in sleep: a randomized controlled trial protocol.","authors":"Gorica Micic,&nbsp;Branko Zajamsek,&nbsp;Bastien Lechat,&nbsp;Kristy Hansen,&nbsp;Hannah Scott,&nbsp;Barbara Toson,&nbsp;Tessa Liebich,&nbsp;Claire Dunbar,&nbsp;Duc Phuc Nguyen,&nbsp;Felix Decup,&nbsp;Andrew Vakulin,&nbsp;Nicole Lovato,&nbsp;Leon Lack,&nbsp;Colin Hansen,&nbsp;Dorothy Bruck,&nbsp;Ching Li Chai-Coetzer,&nbsp;Jeremy Mercer,&nbsp;Con Doolan,&nbsp;Peter Catcheside","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Despite the global expansion of wind farms, effects of wind farm noise (WFN) on sleep remain poorly understood. This protocol details a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the sleep disruption characteristics of WFN versus road traffic noise (RTN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective, seven night within-subjects randomized controlled in-laboratory polysomnography-based trial. Four groups of adults were recruited from; <10 km away from a wind farm, including those with, and another group without, noise-related complaints; an urban RTN exposed group; and a group from a quiet rural area. Following an acclimation night, participants were exposed, in random order, to two separate nights with 20-s or 3-min duration WFN and RTN noise samples reproduced at multiple sound pressure levels during established sleep. Four other nights tested for continuous WFN exposure during wake and/or sleep on sleep outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary analyses will assess changes in electroencephalography (EEG) assessed as micro-arousals (EEG shifts to faster frequencies lasting 3-15 s) and awakenings (>15 s events) from sleep by each noise type with acute (20-s) and more sustained (3-min) noise exposures. Secondary analyses will compare dose-response effects of sound pressure level and noise type on EEG K-complex probabilities and quantitative EEG measures, and cardiovascular activation responses. Group effects, self-reported noise sensitivity, and wake versus sleep noise exposure effects will also be examined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study will help to clarify if wind farm noise has different sleep disruption characteristics compared to road traffic noise.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Despite the global expansion of wind farms, effects of wind farm noise (WFN) on sleep remain poorly understood. This protocol details a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the sleep disruption characteristics of WFN versus road traffic noise (RTN).

Methods: This study was a prospective, seven night within-subjects randomized controlled in-laboratory polysomnography-based trial. Four groups of adults were recruited from; <10 km away from a wind farm, including those with, and another group without, noise-related complaints; an urban RTN exposed group; and a group from a quiet rural area. Following an acclimation night, participants were exposed, in random order, to two separate nights with 20-s or 3-min duration WFN and RTN noise samples reproduced at multiple sound pressure levels during established sleep. Four other nights tested for continuous WFN exposure during wake and/or sleep on sleep outcomes.

Results: The primary analyses will assess changes in electroencephalography (EEG) assessed as micro-arousals (EEG shifts to faster frequencies lasting 3-15 s) and awakenings (>15 s events) from sleep by each noise type with acute (20-s) and more sustained (3-min) noise exposures. Secondary analyses will compare dose-response effects of sound pressure level and noise type on EEG K-complex probabilities and quantitative EEG measures, and cardiovascular activation responses. Group effects, self-reported noise sensitivity, and wake versus sleep noise exposure effects will also be examined.

Conclusions: This study will help to clarify if wind farm noise has different sleep disruption characteristics compared to road traffic noise.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

建立风电场与睡眠中道路交通噪声干扰的急性生理和睡眠中断特征:一项随机对照试验方案。
研究目标:尽管风电场在全球范围内扩张,但人们对风电场噪音对睡眠的影响仍知之甚少。本方案详细介绍了一项随机对照试验,旨在比较WFN与道路交通噪声(RTN)的睡眠中断特征。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、七晚受试者内随机对照的基于实验室多导睡眠图的试验。招募了四组成年人:;结果:主要分析将评估每种噪声类型在急性(20秒)和更持续(3分钟)噪声暴露下的脑电图(EEG)变化,这些变化被评估为微觉醒(EEG向持续3-15秒的更快频率转变)和从睡眠中醒来(>15秒事件)。二次分析将比较声压水平和噪声类型对EEG K复形概率和定量EEG测量以及心血管激活反应的剂量反应效应。还将研究群体效应、自我报告的噪音敏感性以及觉醒与睡眠噪音暴露的影响。结论:与道路交通噪声相比,本研究将有助于阐明风电场噪声是否具有不同的睡眠中断特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信