Comparison of amikacin lung delivery between AKITA® and eFlow rapid® nebulizers in healthy controls and patients with CF: A randomized cross-over trial

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Anne-Sophie Aubriot , Guillaume Maerckx , Teresinha Leal , Sophie Gohy , Gregory Reychler
{"title":"Comparison of amikacin lung delivery between AKITA® and eFlow rapid® nebulizers in healthy controls and patients with CF: A randomized cross-over trial","authors":"Anne-Sophie Aubriot ,&nbsp;Guillaume Maerckx ,&nbsp;Teresinha Leal ,&nbsp;Sophie Gohy ,&nbsp;Gregory Reychler","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Nebulization plays a key role in the treatment of </span>cystic fibrosis<span><span><span>. The Favorite function couple to jet nebulizers (AKITA®) emerged recently. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of the lung delivery by the AKITA® by comparing the </span>urinary concentration of </span>amikacin after nebulization with the AKITA® and the eFlow rapid®, in healthy subjects and patients with CF (PwCF).</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The two samples (healthy subjects and PwCF) were randomized (cross-over 1:1) for two nebulizations (500 mg of amikacin diluted in 4 mL of normal saline solution), with the AKITA® and with the eFlow rapid®. The primary endpoint was the amount of urinary excretion of amikacin over 24 h. The constant of elimination (Ke) was calculated based on the maximal cumulative urinary amikacin excretion plotted over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The total amount of urinary amikacin excretion was greater when AKITA® was used in PwCF (11.7 mg (8.2–14.1) vs 6.1 mg (3.7–13.3); </span><em>p</em> = 0.02) but not different in healthy subjects (14.5 mg (11.7–18.5) vs 12.4 mg (8.0–17.1); <em>p</em> = 0.12). The duration of the nebulization was always shorter with eFlow rapid® than with AKITA® (PwCF: 6.5 ± 0.6 min vs 9.2 ± 1.8 min; <em>p</em> = 0.001 – Healthy: 4.7 ± 1.3 min vs 9.7 ± 1.6 min; <em>p</em> = 0.03). The constant of elimination was similar between the two modalities in CF subjects (0.153 (0.071–0.205) vs 0.149 (0.041–0.182); <em>p</em> = 0.26) and in healthy subjects (0.166 (0.130–0.218) vs 0.167 (0.119–0.210), <em>p</em> = 0.25).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>the Favorite inhalation is better to deliver a specific amount of drug than a mesh nebulizer (eFlow rapid®) in PwCF but not in healthy subjects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041223000508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Nebulization plays a key role in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. The Favorite function couple to jet nebulizers (AKITA®) emerged recently. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of the lung delivery by the AKITA® by comparing the urinary concentration of amikacin after nebulization with the AKITA® and the eFlow rapid®, in healthy subjects and patients with CF (PwCF).

Method

The two samples (healthy subjects and PwCF) were randomized (cross-over 1:1) for two nebulizations (500 mg of amikacin diluted in 4 mL of normal saline solution), with the AKITA® and with the eFlow rapid®. The primary endpoint was the amount of urinary excretion of amikacin over 24 h. The constant of elimination (Ke) was calculated based on the maximal cumulative urinary amikacin excretion plotted over time.

Results

The total amount of urinary amikacin excretion was greater when AKITA® was used in PwCF (11.7 mg (8.2–14.1) vs 6.1 mg (3.7–13.3); p = 0.02) but not different in healthy subjects (14.5 mg (11.7–18.5) vs 12.4 mg (8.0–17.1); p = 0.12). The duration of the nebulization was always shorter with eFlow rapid® than with AKITA® (PwCF: 6.5 ± 0.6 min vs 9.2 ± 1.8 min; p = 0.001 – Healthy: 4.7 ± 1.3 min vs 9.7 ± 1.6 min; p = 0.03). The constant of elimination was similar between the two modalities in CF subjects (0.153 (0.071–0.205) vs 0.149 (0.041–0.182); p = 0.26) and in healthy subjects (0.166 (0.130–0.218) vs 0.167 (0.119–0.210), p = 0.25).

Conclusion

the Favorite inhalation is better to deliver a specific amount of drug than a mesh nebulizer (eFlow rapid®) in PwCF but not in healthy subjects.

AKITA®和eFlow rapid®喷雾器在健康对照组和CF患者中阿米卡星肺部给药的比较:一项随机交叉试验。
简介:雾化在囊性纤维化的治疗中起着关键作用。最近出现了最受欢迎的喷气式喷雾器功能组合(AKITA®)。本研究的目的是通过将雾化后阿米卡星的尿浓度与AKITA®和eFlow rapid®进行比较,来评估AKITA®的肺部输送效率,方法:将两个样本(健康受试者和慢性疲劳综合征患者)随机(交叉1:1)进行两次雾化(500 mg阿米卡星在4 mL生理盐水中稀释),分别使用AKITA®和eFlow rapid®。主要终点是24小时内阿米卡星的尿排泄量。消除常数(Ke)基于随时间绘制的最大累积尿阿米卡星排泄量来计算。结果:当AKITA®用于PwCF时,尿阿米卡星排泄总量更大(11.7 mg(8.2-14.1)vs 6.1 mg(3.7-13.3);p=0.02),但在健康受试者中没有差异(14.5 mg(11.7-18.5)vs 12.4 mg(8.0-17.1);p=0.12)。eFlow rapid®的雾化持续时间总是比AKITA®短(PwCF:6.5±0.6分钟vs 9.2±1.8分钟;p=0.001-健康:4.7±1.3分钟vs 9.7±1.6分钟;p=0.03)。CF受试者的两种模式的消除常数相似(0.153(0.071-0.205)vs 0.149(0.041-0.182);p=0.26)和健康受试者(0.166(0.130-0.218)vs 0.167(0.119-0.210),p=0.25)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信