We (Still!) Need to Talk About Valence: Contemporary Issues and Recommendations for Affective Science

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Eric A. Walle, Daniel Dukes
{"title":"We (Still!) Need to Talk About Valence: Contemporary Issues and Recommendations for Affective Science","authors":"Eric A. Walle,&nbsp;Daniel Dukes","doi":"10.1007/s42761-023-00217-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Valence is central to the experience of emotion. However, to the detriment of affective science, it is often ill-defined and poorly operationalized. Being more precise about what is meant by valence would make for more readily comparable emotion stimuli, methodologies, and results, and would promote consideration of the diversity, complexity, and function of discrete emotions. This brief review uses prior literature and an informal survey of affective scientists to illustrate disagreements in conceptualizing valence. Next, we describe issues of valence in affective science, particularly as they pertain to the emotion process, the functions of emotion, and precision in empirical research. We conclude by providing recommendations for the future of valence in affective science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"4 3","pages":"463 - 469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-023-00217-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-023-00217-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Valence is central to the experience of emotion. However, to the detriment of affective science, it is often ill-defined and poorly operationalized. Being more precise about what is meant by valence would make for more readily comparable emotion stimuli, methodologies, and results, and would promote consideration of the diversity, complexity, and function of discrete emotions. This brief review uses prior literature and an informal survey of affective scientists to illustrate disagreements in conceptualizing valence. Next, we describe issues of valence in affective science, particularly as they pertain to the emotion process, the functions of emotion, and precision in empirical research. We conclude by providing recommendations for the future of valence in affective science.

Abstract Image

我们(仍然!)需要谈谈Valence:情感科学的当代问题和建议。
Valence是情感体验的核心。然而,对情感科学不利的是,它往往定义不清,操作性差。对效价的含义更加精确将使情绪刺激、方法和结果更容易进行比较,并将促进对离散情绪的多样性、复杂性和功能的考虑。这篇简短的综述使用了先前的文献和对情感科学家的非正式调查来说明在概念化合价方面的分歧。接下来,我们将描述情感科学中的效价问题,特别是与情感过程、情感功能和实证研究准确性有关的问题。最后,我们为情感科学中效价的未来提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信