Diagnostic liquid biopsy biomarkers in renal cell cancer

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Richard C. Zieren, Patricia J. Zondervan, Kenneth J. Pienta, Axel Bex, Theo M. de Reijke, Adriaan D. Bins
{"title":"Diagnostic liquid biopsy biomarkers in renal cell cancer","authors":"Richard C. Zieren, Patricia J. Zondervan, Kenneth J. Pienta, Axel Bex, Theo M. de Reijke, Adriaan D. Bins","doi":"10.1038/s41585-023-00818-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clinical presentation of renal cell cancer (RCC) is shifting towards incidental and early detection, creating new challenges in RCC diagnosis. Overtreatment might be reduced with the development of new diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish benign from malignant small renal masses (SRMs). Differently from tissue biopsies, liquid biopsies are obtained from a patient’s blood or urine and, therefore, are minimally invasive and suitable for longitudinal monitoring. The most promising types of liquid biopsy biomarkers for RCC diagnosis are circulating tumour cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell-free DNA. Circulating tumour cell assays have the highest specificity, with low processing time and costs. However, the biological characteristics and low sensitivity limit the use of these markers in SRM diagnostics. Cell-free DNA might complement the diagnosis of high-volume RCC, but the potential for clinical application in SRMs is limited. EVs have the highest biological abundance and the highest sensitivity in identifying low-volume disease; moreover, the molecular characteristics of these markers make EVs suitable for multiple analytical applications. Thus, currently, EV assays have the greatest potential for diagnostic application in RCC (including identification of SRMs). All these liquid biomarkers have potential in clinical practice, pending validation studies. Biomarker implementation will be needed to also improve characterization of RCC subtypes. Last, diagnostic biomarkers might be extended to prognostic or predictive applications. In this Review, the authors provide an overview of currently available diagnostic liquid biopsy biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma, comparing clinical potential and limitations of the three most promising liquid biomarkers: circulating tumour cells, extracellular vesicles and cell-free DNA.","PeriodicalId":19088,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Urology","volume":"21 3","pages":"133-157"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-023-00818-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-023-00818-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical presentation of renal cell cancer (RCC) is shifting towards incidental and early detection, creating new challenges in RCC diagnosis. Overtreatment might be reduced with the development of new diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish benign from malignant small renal masses (SRMs). Differently from tissue biopsies, liquid biopsies are obtained from a patient’s blood or urine and, therefore, are minimally invasive and suitable for longitudinal monitoring. The most promising types of liquid biopsy biomarkers for RCC diagnosis are circulating tumour cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell-free DNA. Circulating tumour cell assays have the highest specificity, with low processing time and costs. However, the biological characteristics and low sensitivity limit the use of these markers in SRM diagnostics. Cell-free DNA might complement the diagnosis of high-volume RCC, but the potential for clinical application in SRMs is limited. EVs have the highest biological abundance and the highest sensitivity in identifying low-volume disease; moreover, the molecular characteristics of these markers make EVs suitable for multiple analytical applications. Thus, currently, EV assays have the greatest potential for diagnostic application in RCC (including identification of SRMs). All these liquid biomarkers have potential in clinical practice, pending validation studies. Biomarker implementation will be needed to also improve characterization of RCC subtypes. Last, diagnostic biomarkers might be extended to prognostic or predictive applications. In this Review, the authors provide an overview of currently available diagnostic liquid biopsy biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma, comparing clinical potential and limitations of the three most promising liquid biomarkers: circulating tumour cells, extracellular vesicles and cell-free DNA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肾细胞癌症的诊断性液体活检生物标志物。
癌症的临床表现正在转向偶然和早期检测,这给肾细胞癌的诊断带来了新的挑战。随着新的诊断生物标志物的开发,鉴别良性和恶性小肾脏肿块(SRM)的过度治疗可能会减少。与组织活检不同,液体活检是从患者的血液或尿液中获得的,因此具有微创性,适合纵向监测。用于RCC诊断的最有前景的液体活检生物标志物类型是循环肿瘤细胞、细胞外小泡(EV)和无细胞DNA。循环肿瘤细胞检测具有最高的特异性,处理时间和成本较低。然而,这些标记物的生物学特性和低灵敏度限制了其在SRM诊断中的应用。无细胞DNA可能补充高容量RCC的诊断,但在SRM中的临床应用潜力有限。EVs在识别低容量疾病方面具有最高的生物丰度和最高的敏感性;此外,这些标记物的分子特征使EVs适合于多种分析应用。因此,目前,EV测定在RCC诊断应用(包括SRM的鉴定)中具有最大的潜力。所有这些液体生物标志物在临床实践中都有潜力,有待验证研究。还需要实施生物标记物来改善RCC亚型的特征。最后,诊断生物标志物可以扩展到预后或预测应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Urology
Nature Reviews Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Urology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.Nature Reviews' basic, translational and clinical content is written by internationally renowned basic and clinical academics and researchers. This journal targeted readers in the biological and medical sciences, from the postgraduate level upwards, aiming to be accessible to professionals in any biological or medical discipline. The journal features authoritative In-depth Reviews providing up-to-date information on topics within a field's history and development. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section offer topical discussions and opinions, filtering primary research from various medical journals. Covering a wide range of subjects, including andrology, urologic oncology, and imaging, Nature Reviews provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and academics within urology and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信