Seattle's sweetened beverage tax implementation and changes in interior marketing displays.

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Journal of Public Health Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1057/s41271-023-00440-7

Nicole Asa, Melissa A Knox, Vanessa M Oddo, Lina Pinero Walkinshaw, Brian E Saelens, Nadine Chan, Jessica C Jones-Smith

{"title":"Seattle's sweetened beverage tax implementation and changes in interior marketing displays.","authors":"Nicole Asa, Melissa A Knox, Vanessa M Oddo, Lina Pinero Walkinshaw, Brian E Saelens, Nadine Chan, Jessica C Jones-Smith","doi":"10.1057/s41271-023-00440-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policymakers aim sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes at decreasing SSB consumption; however, little is known about their impact on beverage marketing in the retail environment. We assessed changes in interior marketing displays within large food stores before and after the implementation of Seattle's SSB tax. We used Poisson difference-in-difference (DID) models to estimate whether presence and variety of interior beverage marketing displays in Seattle changed from before to after the tax compared to displays in non-taxed comparison area stores, overall, and by beverage type. We found no significant changes in overall SSB or non-SSB interior marketing displays in Seattle versus the comparison area. There was less of an increase in displays for diet soda (DID 0.79, 90% CI 0.65, 0.97), and more of an increase in displays for diet energy drinks (DID 1.78, 90% CI 1.03, 3.09) in Seattle versus comparison area. There was mixed evidence that stores changed interior marketing displays in response to the SSB tax.</p>","PeriodicalId":50070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"588-601"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-023-00440-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policymakers aim sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes at decreasing SSB consumption; however, little is known about their impact on beverage marketing in the retail environment. We assessed changes in interior marketing displays within large food stores before and after the implementation of Seattle's SSB tax. We used Poisson difference-in-difference (DID) models to estimate whether presence and variety of interior beverage marketing displays in Seattle changed from before to after the tax compared to displays in non-taxed comparison area stores, overall, and by beverage type. We found no significant changes in overall SSB or non-SSB interior marketing displays in Seattle versus the comparison area. There was less of an increase in displays for diet soda (DID 0.79, 90% CI 0.65, 0.97), and more of an increase in displays for diet energy drinks (DID 1.78, 90% CI 1.03, 3.09) in Seattle versus comparison area. There was mixed evidence that stores changed interior marketing displays in response to the SSB tax.

查看原文本刊更多论文

西雅图甜饮料税的实施和内部营销展示的变化。

政策制定者的目标是降低含糖饮料的消费；然而，人们对它们在零售环境中对饮料营销的影响知之甚少。我们评估了西雅图SSB税实施前后大型食品店内部营销展示的变化。我们使用差异中的泊松差（DID）模型来估计西雅图内部饮料营销展示的存在性和多样性与免税比较区商店的展示相比是否从税前到税后发生了变化，总体而言，以及按饮料类型。我们发现，与比较地区相比，西雅图的整体SSB或非SSB内部营销展示没有显著变化。与比较地区相比，西雅图无糖汽水的显示增加较少（DID 0.79，90%CI 0.65，0.97），而无糖能量饮料的显示增加较多（DID 1.78，90%CI 1.03，3.09）。有各种各样的证据表明，商店为了应对SSB税而改变了内部营销展示。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Public Health Policy 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

2.60%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Public Health Policy (JPHP) will continue its 35 year tradition: an accessible source of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy, rigorously edited, and progressive. JPHP aims to create a more inclusive public health policy dialogue, within nations and among them. It broadens public health policy debates beyond the ''health system'' to examine all forces and environments that impinge on the health of populations. It provides an exciting platform for airing controversy and framing policy debates - honing policies to solve new problems and unresolved old ones. JPHP welcomes unsolicited original scientific and policy contributions on all public health topics. New authors are particularly encouraged to enter debates about how to improve the health of populations and reduce health disparities.