Determine atrial fibrillation burden with a photoplethysmographic mobile sensor: the atrial fibrillation burden trial: detection and quantification of episodes of atrial fibrillation using a cloud analytics service connected to a wearable with photoplethysmographic sensor.

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2023-07-06 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztad039
Pamela Reissenberger, Peter Serfözö, Diana Piper, Norman Juchler, Sara Glanzmann, Jasmin Gram, Karina Hensler, Hannah Tonidandel, Elena Börlin, Marcus D'Souza, Patrick Badertscher, Jens Eckstein
{"title":"Determine atrial fibrillation burden with a photoplethysmographic mobile sensor: the atrial fibrillation burden trial: detection and quantification of episodes of atrial fibrillation using a cloud analytics service connected to a wearable with photoplethysmographic sensor.","authors":"Pamela Reissenberger,&nbsp;Peter Serfözö,&nbsp;Diana Piper,&nbsp;Norman Juchler,&nbsp;Sara Glanzmann,&nbsp;Jasmin Gram,&nbsp;Karina Hensler,&nbsp;Hannah Tonidandel,&nbsp;Elena Börlin,&nbsp;Marcus D'Souza,&nbsp;Patrick Badertscher,&nbsp;Jens Eckstein","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Recent studies suggest that atrial fibrillation (AF) burden (time AF is present) is an independent risk factor for stroke. The aim of this trial was to study the feasibility and accuracy to identify AF episodes and quantify AF burden in patients with a known history of paroxysmal AF with a photoplethysmography (PPG)-based wearable.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this prospective, single-centre trial, the PPG-based estimation of AF burden was compared with measurements of a conventional 48 h Holter electrocardiogram (ECG), which served as the gold standard. An automated algorithm performed PPG analysis, while a cardiologist, blinded for the PPG data, analysed the ECG data. Detected episodes of AF measured by both methods were aligned timewise.Out of 100 patients recruited, 8 had to be excluded due to technical issues. Data from 92 patients were analysed [55.4% male; age 73.3 years (standard deviation, SD: 10.4)]. Twenty-five patients presented AF during the study period. The intraclass correlation coefficient of total AF burden minutes detected by the two measurement methods was 0.88. The percentage of correctly identified AF burden over all patients was 85.1% and the respective parameter for non-AF time was 99.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate that a PPG-based wearable in combination with an analytical algorithm appears to be suitable for a semiquantitative estimation of AF burden in patients with a known history of paroxysmal AF.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04563572.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/42/ztad039.PMC10545505.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Recent studies suggest that atrial fibrillation (AF) burden (time AF is present) is an independent risk factor for stroke. The aim of this trial was to study the feasibility and accuracy to identify AF episodes and quantify AF burden in patients with a known history of paroxysmal AF with a photoplethysmography (PPG)-based wearable.

Methods and results: In this prospective, single-centre trial, the PPG-based estimation of AF burden was compared with measurements of a conventional 48 h Holter electrocardiogram (ECG), which served as the gold standard. An automated algorithm performed PPG analysis, while a cardiologist, blinded for the PPG data, analysed the ECG data. Detected episodes of AF measured by both methods were aligned timewise.Out of 100 patients recruited, 8 had to be excluded due to technical issues. Data from 92 patients were analysed [55.4% male; age 73.3 years (standard deviation, SD: 10.4)]. Twenty-five patients presented AF during the study period. The intraclass correlation coefficient of total AF burden minutes detected by the two measurement methods was 0.88. The percentage of correctly identified AF burden over all patients was 85.1% and the respective parameter for non-AF time was 99.9%.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that a PPG-based wearable in combination with an analytical algorithm appears to be suitable for a semiquantitative estimation of AF burden in patients with a known history of paroxysmal AF.

Trial registration number: NCT04563572.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用光电体积描记移动传感器确定心房颤动负荷:心房颤动负荷试验:使用连接到带光电体积描描记传感器的可穿戴设备的云分析服务检测和量化心房颤动发作。
目的:最近的研究表明,心房颤动(AF)负担(AF存在的时间)是中风的一个独立风险因素。本试验的目的是研究使用基于光体积描记术(PPG)的可穿戴设备识别已知阵发性房颤病史患者的房颤发作并量化房颤负担的可行性和准确性。方法和结果:在这项前瞻性的单中心试验中,将基于PPG的AF负荷估计与作为金标准的传统48小时动态心电图(ECG)的测量结果进行了比较。一个自动算法进行PPG分析,而一位心脏病专家对PPG数据视而不见,分析心电图数据。通过两种方法测量的检测到的AF发作按时间排列。在招募的100名患者中,有8名因技术问题而被排除在外。分析了92名患者的数据[55.4%为男性;年龄73.3岁(标准差,SD:10.4)]。在研究期间,25名患者出现房颤。两种测量方法检测到的总AF负荷分钟的组内相关系数为0.88。在所有患者中,正确识别AF负担的百分比为85.1%,非AF时间的相应参数为99.9%。结论:我们的结果表明,基于PPG的可穿戴设备与分析算法相结合,似乎适用于对已知阵发性AF病史的患者的AF负担进行半定量估计。试验注册号:NCT04563572。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信