Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.

Yordan P Penev, Alice Beneke, Kevin T Root, Emily Meisel, Sean Kwak, Michael J Diaz, Julia L Root, Mohammad R Hosseini, Brandon Lucke-Wold
{"title":"Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yordan P Penev, Alice Beneke, Kevin T Root, Emily Meisel, Sean Kwak, Michael J Diaz, Julia L Root, Mohammad R Hosseini, Brandon Lucke-Wold","doi":"10.33696/neurol.4.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are a rapidly advancing field which utilizes brain activity to control external devices for a myriad of functions, including the restoration of motor function. Clinically, BCIs have been especially impactful in patients who suffer from stroke-mediated damage. However, due to the rapid advancement in the field, there is a lack of accepted standards of practice. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature published regarding the efficacy of BCI-based rehabilitation of motor dysfunction in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 statement. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried for relevant articles and screened for inclusion criteria by two authors. All discrepancies were resolved by discussion among both reviewers and subsequent consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11/12 (91.6%) of studies focused on upper extremity outcomes and reported larger initial improvements for participants in the treatment arm (using BCI) as compared to those in the control arm (no BCI). 2/2 studies focused on lower extremity outcomes reported improvements for the treatment arm compared to the control arm.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>This systematic review illustrates the utility BCI has for the restoration of upper extremity and lower extremity motor function in stroke patients and supports further investigation of BCI for other clinical indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental neurology","volume":"4 3","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/neurol.4.077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are a rapidly advancing field which utilizes brain activity to control external devices for a myriad of functions, including the restoration of motor function. Clinically, BCIs have been especially impactful in patients who suffer from stroke-mediated damage. However, due to the rapid advancement in the field, there is a lack of accepted standards of practice. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature published regarding the efficacy of BCI-based rehabilitation of motor dysfunction in stroke patients.

Methodology: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 statement. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried for relevant articles and screened for inclusion criteria by two authors. All discrepancies were resolved by discussion among both reviewers and subsequent consensus.

Results: 11/12 (91.6%) of studies focused on upper extremity outcomes and reported larger initial improvements for participants in the treatment arm (using BCI) as compared to those in the control arm (no BCI). 2/2 studies focused on lower extremity outcomes reported improvements for the treatment arm compared to the control arm.

Discussion/conclusion: This systematic review illustrates the utility BCI has for the restoration of upper extremity and lower extremity motor function in stroke patients and supports further investigation of BCI for other clinical indications.

Abstract Image

脑机接口在脑卒中患者中的治疗效果:一项系统综述。
背景:脑机接口(BCIs)是一个快速发展的领域,它利用大脑活动来控制外部设备实现多种功能,包括恢复运动功能。临床上,脑机接口对中风介导的损伤患者尤其有影响。然而,由于该领域的快速发展,缺乏公认的实践标准。因此,本系统综述的目的是总结目前发表的关于脑机接口康复治疗中风患者运动功能障碍疗效的文献。方法:本系统审查是根据2020年系统审查和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明中规定的指南进行的。PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆查询了相关文章,并由两位作者筛选了纳入标准。所有差异都通过两位评审员的讨论和随后达成的共识得到了解决。结果:11/12(91.6%)的研究侧重于上肢结果,并报告与对照组(无脑机接口)相比,治疗组(使用脑机接口的)参与者的初始改善更大。关注下肢结果的2/2项研究报告称,与对照组相比,治疗组有改善。讨论/结论:本系统综述阐明了脑机接口在脑卒中患者上肢和下肢运动功能恢复方面的作用,并支持脑机接口对其他临床适应症的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信