Clinician perspectives on levels of evidence and oversight for deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant childhood OCD

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michelle T. Pham , Tiffany A. Campbell , Natalie Dorfman , Laura Torgerson , Kristin Kostick-Quenet , Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby , Eric A. Storch , Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
{"title":"Clinician perspectives on levels of evidence and oversight for deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant childhood OCD","authors":"Michelle T. Pham ,&nbsp;Tiffany A. Campbell ,&nbsp;Natalie Dorfman ,&nbsp;Laura Torgerson ,&nbsp;Kristin Kostick-Quenet ,&nbsp;Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby ,&nbsp;Eric A. Storch ,&nbsp;Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Approximately 10–20% of children with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have treatment-resistant presentations, and there is likely interest in developing interventions for this patient group, which may include deep brain stimulation<span> (DBS). The World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery has argued that at least two successful </span></span>randomized controlled trials<span> should be available before DBS treatment<span> for a psychiatric disorder is considered “established.” The FDA approved DBS for adults with treatment-resistant OCD under a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) in 2009, which requires that a device be used to manage or treat a condition impacting 8000 or fewer patients annually in the United States. DBS is currently offered to children ages 7 and older with treatment-resistant dystonia under an HDE. Ethical and empirical work are needed to evaluate whether and under what conditions it might be appropriate to offer DBS for treatment-resistant childhood OCD. To address this gap, we report qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 25 clinicians with expertise in this area. First, we report clinician perspectives on acceptable levels of evidence to offer DBS in this patient population. Second, we describe their perspectives on institutional policies or protocols that might be needed to effectively provide care for this patient population.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364923000519","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 10–20% of children with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have treatment-resistant presentations, and there is likely interest in developing interventions for this patient group, which may include deep brain stimulation (DBS). The World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery has argued that at least two successful randomized controlled trials should be available before DBS treatment for a psychiatric disorder is considered “established.” The FDA approved DBS for adults with treatment-resistant OCD under a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) in 2009, which requires that a device be used to manage or treat a condition impacting 8000 or fewer patients annually in the United States. DBS is currently offered to children ages 7 and older with treatment-resistant dystonia under an HDE. Ethical and empirical work are needed to evaluate whether and under what conditions it might be appropriate to offer DBS for treatment-resistant childhood OCD. To address this gap, we report qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 25 clinicians with expertise in this area. First, we report clinician perspectives on acceptable levels of evidence to offer DBS in this patient population. Second, we describe their perspectives on institutional policies or protocols that might be needed to effectively provide care for this patient population.

临床医生对难治儿童强迫症深部脑刺激的证据和监督水平的看法。
大约10-20%的强迫症(OCD)儿童有抗治疗表现,可能有兴趣为这一患者群体开发干预措施,其中可能包括脑深部刺激(DBS)。世界立体定向和功能性神经外科学会认为,在DBS治疗精神障碍被认为“成立”之前,至少应该有两项成功的随机对照试验。2009年,美国食品药品监督管理局根据人道主义器械豁免(HDE)批准DBS治疗成人难治性强迫症,这要求使用一种设备来管理或治疗在美国每年影响8000名或更少患者的疾病。DBS目前在HDE下提供给7岁及以上具有治疗耐药性肌张力障碍的儿童。需要进行伦理和实证研究,以评估是否以及在何种条件下提供DBS治疗难治儿童强迫症是合适的。为了解决这一差距,我们报告了对25名具有该领域专业知识的临床医生进行的半结构化访谈的定性数据。首先,我们报告了临床医生对在该患者群体中提供DBS的可接受证据水平的看法。其次,我们描述了他们对有效为这一患者群体提供护理所需的机构政策或协议的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信