Disentangling Positive Selection from Relaxed Selection in Animal Mitochondrial Genomes.

IF 2.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1086/725805
Kendra D Zwonitzer, Erik N K Iverson, Jess E Sterling, Ryan J Weaver, Bradley A Maclaine, Justin C Havird
{"title":"Disentangling Positive Selection from Relaxed Selection in Animal Mitochondrial Genomes.","authors":"Kendra D Zwonitzer, Erik N K Iverson, Jess E Sterling, Ryan J Weaver, Bradley A Maclaine, Justin C Havird","doi":"10.1086/725805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractDisentangling different types of selection is a common goal in molecular evolution. Elevated <i>d</i><sub>N</sub>/<i>d</i><sub>S</sub> ratios (the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates) in focal lineages are often interpreted as signs of positive selection. Paradoxically, relaxed purifying selection can also result in elevated <i>d</i><sub>N</sub>/<i>d</i><sub>S</sub> ratios, but tests to distinguish these two causes are seldomly implemented. Here, we reevaluated seven case studies describing elevated <i>d</i><sub>N</sub>/<i>d</i><sub>S</sub> ratios in animal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and their accompanying hypotheses regarding selection. They included flightless lineages versus flighted lineages in birds, bats, and insects and physiological adaptations in snakes, two groups of electric fishes, and primates. We found that elevated <i>d</i><sub>N</sub>/<i>d</i><sub>S</sub> ratios were often not caused by the predicted mechanism, and we sometimes found strong support for the opposite mechanism. We discuss reasons why energetic hypotheses may be confounded by other selective forces acting on mtDNA and caution against overinterpreting singular molecular signals, including elevated <i>d</i><sub>N</sub>/<i>d</i><sub>S</sub> ratios.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"202 4","pages":"E121-E129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10955554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractDisentangling different types of selection is a common goal in molecular evolution. Elevated dN/dS ratios (the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates) in focal lineages are often interpreted as signs of positive selection. Paradoxically, relaxed purifying selection can also result in elevated dN/dS ratios, but tests to distinguish these two causes are seldomly implemented. Here, we reevaluated seven case studies describing elevated dN/dS ratios in animal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and their accompanying hypotheses regarding selection. They included flightless lineages versus flighted lineages in birds, bats, and insects and physiological adaptations in snakes, two groups of electric fishes, and primates. We found that elevated dN/dS ratios were often not caused by the predicted mechanism, and we sometimes found strong support for the opposite mechanism. We discuss reasons why energetic hypotheses may be confounded by other selective forces acting on mtDNA and caution against overinterpreting singular molecular signals, including elevated dN/dS ratios.

动物线粒体基因组中阳性选择与松弛选择的分离。
解开不同类型的选择是分子进化的共同目标。局灶谱系中dN/dS比率(非同义与同义替换率的比率)的升高通常被解释为积极选择的迹象。矛盾的是,放松的纯化选择也会导致dN/dS比率升高,但区分这两个原因的测试很少实施。在这里,我们重新评估了七项描述动物线粒体DNA(mtDNA)中dN/dS比率升高的案例研究及其相关的选择假设。它们包括鸟类、蝙蝠和昆虫的不会飞的谱系与会飞的谱系,以及蛇、两组电鱼和灵长类动物的生理适应。我们发现,dN/dS比率的升高通常不是由预测的机制引起的,有时我们发现对相反机制的有力支持。我们讨论了为什么高能假说可能被作用在mtDNA上的其他选择力所混淆的原因,并警告不要过度解读奇异分子信号,包括dN/dS比率的升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信