Clinical Outcomes of Radiation Therapy for Choroidal Metastases and A Literature Review.

Q4 Medicine
Kurume Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-30 Epub Date: 2023-10-03 DOI:10.2739/kurumemedj.MS69120012
Masanari Niwa, Natsuo Tomita, Akifumi Miyakawa, Shiho Ayakawa, Natsuko Takama, Akira Torii, Nozomi Kita, Satoshi Ishikura, Yuta Shibamoto
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Radiation Therapy for Choroidal Metastases and A Literature Review.","authors":"Masanari Niwa, Natsuo Tomita, Akifumi Miyakawa, Shiho Ayakawa, Natsuko Takama, Akira Torii, Nozomi Kita, Satoshi Ishikura, Yuta Shibamoto","doi":"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS69120012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiation therapy (RT) for choroidal metastasis (CM) aims to preserve vision and achieve local control (LC), thereby maintaining quality of life. The present study reports the clinical outcomes of RT for CM and reviews the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data on 11 patients with CM; their primary tumors were breast cancer (n=3), lung cancer (n=3), leukemia (n=2), lymphoma (n=2), and gastric cancer (n=1). Four patients had bilateral CM. The median radiation dose was 39 Gy in 13 fractions (range, 20-50 Gy in 10-25 fractions). We investigated changes in visual acuity, tumor responses, morbidities, LC, and overall survival (OS). A systematic review of literature published between 1990 and 2020 was performed using the PubMed database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One, 1, and 6 patients had improved, stabilized, and worse visual acuity, respectively (data missing for 3 patients). Nevertheless, eight patients considered their visual acuity to have improved or remained the same after RT. Among 15 lesions in 11 patients, complete and partial responses were observed in 2 and 6, respectively (data missing for 7 lesions in 4 patients). Three-year LC and OS rates were 100 and 32%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 morbidities were not observed. In the literature review, the most common primary cancer was breast cancer followed by lung cancer. Improvements in or the stabilization of visual acuity was observed in 80% of patients (range, 47-100), and the median survival time was 11 months (range, 4.9-23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RT is an efficient and safe palliative treatment for CM without severe toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":39559,"journal":{"name":"Kurume Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"89-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurume Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS69120012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Radiation therapy (RT) for choroidal metastasis (CM) aims to preserve vision and achieve local control (LC), thereby maintaining quality of life. The present study reports the clinical outcomes of RT for CM and reviews the literature.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data on 11 patients with CM; their primary tumors were breast cancer (n=3), lung cancer (n=3), leukemia (n=2), lymphoma (n=2), and gastric cancer (n=1). Four patients had bilateral CM. The median radiation dose was 39 Gy in 13 fractions (range, 20-50 Gy in 10-25 fractions). We investigated changes in visual acuity, tumor responses, morbidities, LC, and overall survival (OS). A systematic review of literature published between 1990 and 2020 was performed using the PubMed database.

Results: One, 1, and 6 patients had improved, stabilized, and worse visual acuity, respectively (data missing for 3 patients). Nevertheless, eight patients considered their visual acuity to have improved or remained the same after RT. Among 15 lesions in 11 patients, complete and partial responses were observed in 2 and 6, respectively (data missing for 7 lesions in 4 patients). Three-year LC and OS rates were 100 and 32%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 morbidities were not observed. In the literature review, the most common primary cancer was breast cancer followed by lung cancer. Improvements in or the stabilization of visual acuity was observed in 80% of patients (range, 47-100), and the median survival time was 11 months (range, 4.9-23).

Conclusion: RT is an efficient and safe palliative treatment for CM without severe toxicity.

脉络膜转移瘤放射治疗的临床疗效及文献综述。
引言:脉络膜转移瘤(CM)的放射治疗(RT)旨在保持视力并实现局部控制(LC),从而维持生活质量。本研究报告了RT治疗CM的临床结果,并回顾了文献。方法:回顾性分析11例CM患者的临床资料;原发肿瘤为乳腺癌癌症(n=3)、癌症(n=3,白血病(n=2)、淋巴瘤(n=2,和癌症(n=1)。4名患者患有双侧CM。中位辐射剂量为39 Gy,分为13个部分(范围为20-50 Gy,共10-25个部分)。我们研究了视力、肿瘤反应、发病率、LC和总生存率(OS)的变化。使用PubMed数据库对1990年至2020年间发表的文献进行了系统综述。结果:1例、1例和6例患者的视力分别有所改善、稳定和恶化(3例患者的数据缺失)。然而,8名患者认为他们的视力在RT后有所改善或保持不变。在11名患者的15个病变中,分别有2名和6名患者观察到完全和部分反应(4名患者的7个病变数据缺失)。三年LC和OS的发生率分别为100%和32%。未观察到≥3级的疾病。在文献综述中,最常见的原发性癌症是癌症,其次是癌症。80%的患者(范围47-100)视力得到改善或稳定,中位生存时间为11个月(范围4.9-23)。结论:RT是一种有效、安全的CM姑息治疗方法,无严重毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kurume Medical Journal
Kurume Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信