Views of democracy and society and support for political violence in the USA: findings from a nationally representative survey.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Garen J Wintemute, Sonia L Robinson, Andrew Crawford, Daniel Tancredi, Julia P Schleimer, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Paul M Reeping, Aaron B Shev, Veronica A Pear
{"title":"Views of democracy and society and support for political violence in the USA: findings from a nationally representative survey.","authors":"Garen J Wintemute, Sonia L Robinson, Andrew Crawford, Daniel Tancredi, Julia P Schleimer, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Paul M Reeping, Aaron B Shev, Veronica A Pear","doi":"10.1186/s40621-023-00456-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current conditions in the USA suggest an increasing risk for political violence. Little is known about the prevalence of beliefs that might lead to political violence, about support for and personal willingness to engage in political violence, and about how those measures vary with individual characteristics, lethality of violence, political objectives that violence might advance, or specific populations as targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional US nationally representative survey was conducted on May 13 to June 2, 2022, of adult members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Outcomes are weighted, population-representative proportions of respondents endorsing selected beliefs about American democracy and society and violence to advance political objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 8620 respondents; 50.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.3%, 51.7%) were female; and weighted mean (± standard deviation) age was 48.4 (± 18.0) years. Nearly 1 in 5 (18.9%, 95% CI 18.0%, 19.9%) agreed strongly or very strongly that \"having a strong leader for America is more important than having a democracy\"; 16.2% (95% CI 15.3%, 17.1%) agreed strongly or very strongly that \"in America, native-born white people are being replaced by immigrants,\" and 13.7% (95% CI 12.9%, 14.6%) agreed strongly or very strongly that \"in the next few years, there will be civil war in the United States.\" One-third of respondents (32.8%, 95% CI 31.7%, 33.9%) considered violence to be usually or always justified to advance at least 1 of 17 specific political objectives. Among all respondents, 7.7% (95% CI 7.0%, 8.4%) thought it very or extremely likely that within the next few years, in a situation where they believe political violence is justified, \"I will be armed with a gun\"; 1.1% (95% CI 0.9%, 1.4%) thought it very or extremely likely that \"I will shoot someone with a gun.\" Support for political violence and for the use of firearms in such violence frequently declined with increasing age, education, and income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small but concerning proportions of the population consider violence, including lethal violence, to be usually or always justified to advance political objectives. Prevention efforts should proceed urgently based on the best evidence available.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"10 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-023-00456-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current conditions in the USA suggest an increasing risk for political violence. Little is known about the prevalence of beliefs that might lead to political violence, about support for and personal willingness to engage in political violence, and about how those measures vary with individual characteristics, lethality of violence, political objectives that violence might advance, or specific populations as targets.

Methods: This cross-sectional US nationally representative survey was conducted on May 13 to June 2, 2022, of adult members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Outcomes are weighted, population-representative proportions of respondents endorsing selected beliefs about American democracy and society and violence to advance political objectives.

Results: The analytic sample included 8620 respondents; 50.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.3%, 51.7%) were female; and weighted mean (± standard deviation) age was 48.4 (± 18.0) years. Nearly 1 in 5 (18.9%, 95% CI 18.0%, 19.9%) agreed strongly or very strongly that "having a strong leader for America is more important than having a democracy"; 16.2% (95% CI 15.3%, 17.1%) agreed strongly or very strongly that "in America, native-born white people are being replaced by immigrants," and 13.7% (95% CI 12.9%, 14.6%) agreed strongly or very strongly that "in the next few years, there will be civil war in the United States." One-third of respondents (32.8%, 95% CI 31.7%, 33.9%) considered violence to be usually or always justified to advance at least 1 of 17 specific political objectives. Among all respondents, 7.7% (95% CI 7.0%, 8.4%) thought it very or extremely likely that within the next few years, in a situation where they believe political violence is justified, "I will be armed with a gun"; 1.1% (95% CI 0.9%, 1.4%) thought it very or extremely likely that "I will shoot someone with a gun." Support for political violence and for the use of firearms in such violence frequently declined with increasing age, education, and income.

Conclusions: Small but concerning proportions of the population consider violence, including lethal violence, to be usually or always justified to advance political objectives. Prevention efforts should proceed urgently based on the best evidence available.

Abstract Image

美国对民主和社会的看法以及对政治暴力的支持:一项具有全国代表性的调查结果。
背景:美国目前的情况表明,发生政治暴力的风险越来越大。人们对可能导致政治暴力的信仰的普遍性、对参与政治暴力的支持和个人意愿,以及这些措施如何因个人特征、暴力的致命性、暴力可能推进的政治目标或特定人群而变化知之甚少。方法:这项具有美国全国代表性的横断面调查于2022年5月13日至6月2日对益普索知识小组的成年成员进行。结果是加权的,受访者的人口代表比例支持对美国民主和社会的选定信念,以及为推进政治目标而使用暴力。结果:分析样本包括8620名受访者;50.5%(95%置信区间49.3%,51.7%)为女性;加权平均值(± 标准差)年龄为48.4(± 18.0)年。近五分之一(18.9%,95%置信区间18.0%,19.9%)强烈或非常强烈地同意“拥有一位强有力的美国领导人比拥有民主更重要”;16.2%(95%置信区间15.3%,17.1%)强烈或非常强烈地同意“在美国,土生土长的白人正在被移民取代”,13.7%(95%可信区间12.9%,14.6%)强烈地或非常强烈的同意“在未来几年,美国将爆发内战”。“三分之一的受访者(32.8%,95%置信区间31.7%,33.9%)认为,为了推进17个具体政治目标中的至少一个,暴力通常或总是合理的。在所有受访者中,7.7%(95%置信区间7.0%,8.4%)认为,在未来几年内,在他们认为政治暴力是合理的情况下,“我会持枪”的可能性非常大或极低;1.1%(95%置信区间0.9%,1.4%)认为“我会用枪射杀某人”的可能性很高或极低。随着年龄、教育程度和收入的增加,对政治暴力和在此类暴力中使用枪支的支持率经常下降。结论:少数但令人担忧的人口认为,暴力,包括致命暴力,通常或总是有理由推进政治目标。预防工作应在现有最佳证据的基础上紧急开展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信