Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1177/00332941231202453
Nadav Goldschmied, Ally Ramona, Eden Stilman, Emily Bomberger, Francesca Lehman, Kristina Malek, Rahn Minagawa
{"title":"Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference.","authors":"Nadav Goldschmied, Ally Ramona, Eden Stilman, Emily Bomberger, Francesca Lehman, Kristina Malek, Rahn Minagawa","doi":"10.1177/00332941231202453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In light of California's passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no longer direct file. We used a sample of 106 reports written by forensic psychologists on behalf of the defense examining the life circumstances of minors who allegedly committed serious crimes. Close to two-thirds of minors were kept in the juvenile system whereas the rest were transferred. Utilizing regression analysis, we found that minors with at least one murder charge were more likely to end up in adult court. In regards to race, we detected an overall considerable overrepresentation of Black and Latino juveniles and an underrepresentation of Whites with charges against them but no support of racial bias in transfer decisions in our restricted data set.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"3709-3724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231202453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In light of California's passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no longer direct file. We used a sample of 106 reports written by forensic psychologists on behalf of the defense examining the life circumstances of minors who allegedly committed serious crimes. Close to two-thirds of minors were kept in the juvenile system whereas the rest were transferred. Utilizing regression analysis, we found that minors with at least one murder charge were more likely to end up in adult court. In regards to race, we detected an overall considerable overrepresentation of Black and Latino juveniles and an underrepresentation of Whites with charges against them but no support of racial bias in transfer decisions in our restricted data set.

将未成年人移交加州成人法院:调查造成差异的法律/人口因素。
鉴于加利福尼亚州在2016年通过了57号提案,本研究考察了法律/人口统计变量与将青少年转移到成人法院系统的决定之间的关系。根据第57号提案,移交决定完全委托法官,检察官不能再直接提交文件。我们使用了106份由法医心理学家代表辩方撰写的报告样本,调查了据称犯下严重罪行的未成年人的生活情况。将近三分之二的未成年人被关押在青少年系统中,其余的则被转移。利用回归分析,我们发现,至少有一项谋杀指控的未成年人更有可能最终进入成人法庭。在种族方面,我们发现黑人和拉丁裔青少年的总体代表性相当高,白人的代表性不足,对他们提出了指控,但在我们的受限数据集中,没有支持转移决定中的种族偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信