Recovery after a suicidal episode: Developing and validating the Recovery Evaluation and Suicide Support Tool (RESST).

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Yosef Sokol, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Chayim Rosensweig, Chana Silver, Shifra Hubner, Louis Primavera, Marianne Goodman
{"title":"Recovery after a suicidal episode: Developing and validating the Recovery Evaluation and Suicide Support Tool (RESST).","authors":"Yosef Sokol, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Chayim Rosensweig, Chana Silver, Shifra Hubner, Louis Primavera, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1037/pas0001269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The personal recovery movement advocates for shifting emphasis from clinical symptom reduction toward reclaiming personal agency and creating meaning-filled lives despite the presence of distressing experiences. Corresponding personal recovery measures have been developed; however, there is no established psychometric assessment of personal recovery following a suicidal episode. This study addressed this gap by developing the Recovery Evaluation and Suicide Support Tool (RESST) and assessing its test score reliability, test score interpretations' validity, and psychometric properties. Throughout RESST's development, input from diverse stakeholders-including clinicians, researchers, and individuals with lived experience-was gathered to ensure a meaningful and useful scale. Exploratory factor analysis techniques were used with adults with a suicidal episode history (<i>N</i> = 502) to select and refine items, culminating in a 21-item scale with four distinct subscales: Self-Worth, Life Worth, Social Worth, and Self-Understanding. Confirmatory factor analysis techniques demonstrated model fit across three samples of adults with a suicidal episode history (combined <i>N</i> = 1,523), and test-retest reliability was obtained (<i>N</i> = 204). The results revealed that RESST scores exhibit an internally consistent and replicable factor structure, consistent with personal recovery theory. Additionally, the interpretation of test scores exhibited both convergent and discriminant validity. Mental health indices related to recovery, negative mood states, suicidality, and meaning in life had significant moderate-to-strong correlations with the RESST, supporting the validity of the test score interpretations and clinical relevance. This measure should aid research into recovery processes and understanding how recovery following a suicidal episode may be enhanced clinically and personally. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 10","pages":"842-855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The personal recovery movement advocates for shifting emphasis from clinical symptom reduction toward reclaiming personal agency and creating meaning-filled lives despite the presence of distressing experiences. Corresponding personal recovery measures have been developed; however, there is no established psychometric assessment of personal recovery following a suicidal episode. This study addressed this gap by developing the Recovery Evaluation and Suicide Support Tool (RESST) and assessing its test score reliability, test score interpretations' validity, and psychometric properties. Throughout RESST's development, input from diverse stakeholders-including clinicians, researchers, and individuals with lived experience-was gathered to ensure a meaningful and useful scale. Exploratory factor analysis techniques were used with adults with a suicidal episode history (N = 502) to select and refine items, culminating in a 21-item scale with four distinct subscales: Self-Worth, Life Worth, Social Worth, and Self-Understanding. Confirmatory factor analysis techniques demonstrated model fit across three samples of adults with a suicidal episode history (combined N = 1,523), and test-retest reliability was obtained (N = 204). The results revealed that RESST scores exhibit an internally consistent and replicable factor structure, consistent with personal recovery theory. Additionally, the interpretation of test scores exhibited both convergent and discriminant validity. Mental health indices related to recovery, negative mood states, suicidality, and meaning in life had significant moderate-to-strong correlations with the RESST, supporting the validity of the test score interpretations and clinical relevance. This measure should aid research into recovery processes and understanding how recovery following a suicidal episode may be enhanced clinically and personally. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

自杀事件后的康复:开发和验证康复评估和自杀支持工具(RESST)。
个人康复运动主张将重点从临床症状减轻转移到恢复个人能动性和创造充满意义的生活,尽管存在痛苦的经历。制定了相应的个人康复措施;然而,目前还没有建立自杀事件后个人康复的心理测量评估。这项研究通过开发康复评估和自杀支持工具(RESST)并评估其测试分数的可靠性、测试分数解释的有效性和心理测量特性来解决这一差距。在RESST的整个开发过程中,收集了包括临床医生、研究人员和有生活经验的个人在内的不同利益相关者的意见,以确保有意义和有用的规模。探索性因素分析技术用于有自杀史的成年人(N=502),以选择和完善项目,最终形成21个项目的量表,其中有四个不同的分量表:自我价值、生活价值、社会价值和自我理解。验证性因素分析技术证明了三个有自杀发作史的成年人样本的模型拟合(组合N=1523),并获得了重新测试的可靠性(N=204)。结果表明,RESST评分呈现出内部一致且可复制的因子结构,与个人恢复理论一致。此外,对测试成绩的解释表现出收敛有效性和判别有效性。与康复、消极情绪状态、自杀和生活意义相关的心理健康指数与RESST具有显著的中到强相关性,支持测试分数解释的有效性和临床相关性。这项措施应有助于研究康复过程,并了解自杀事件后的康复如何在临床和个人上得到加强。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信