Development and initial validation of the Mount Sinai Resilience Scale.

IF 2.7 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1037/tra0001590

Jonathan M DePierro, Deborah B Marin, Vanshdeep Sharma, Craig L Katz, Robert H Pietrzak, Adriana Feder, James W Murrough, Sydney Starkweather, Brian P Marx, Steven M Southwick, Dennis S Charney

{"title":"Development and initial validation of the Mount Sinai Resilience Scale.","authors":"Jonathan M DePierro, Deborah B Marin, Vanshdeep Sharma, Craig L Katz, Robert H Pietrzak, Adriana Feder, James W Murrough, Sydney Starkweather, Brian P Marx, Steven M Southwick, Dennis S Charney","doi":"10.1037/tra0001590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The construct of psychological resilience has received increasing attention in the mental health field. This article describes the development and initial validation of a novel self-report resilience scale, which addresses gaps in the resilience measurement literature by assessing thoughts and behaviors that help promote resilience rather than traits, and simultaneously evaluating multiple factors previously associated with resilience.Method: Following consensus meetings focused on scale development, we conducted an online study (n = 1,864) of U.S. adults to develop and validate an initial version of the Mount Sinai Resilience Scale (MSRS).Results: An exploratory factor analysis in a random 50% of the sample suggested a seven-factor solution; this solution was then generally supported by a follow-up confirmatory factor analysis in the remaining 50% of the sample. After removing poor-fitting items, a revised 24-item scale correlated in the expected directions with established measures of perceived resilience and resilience-related constructs (e.g., social support and optimism).Conclusions: Collectively, the results of this study provide initial support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the MSRS and describe its factor structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"407-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10842183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The construct of psychological resilience has received increasing attention in the mental health field. This article describes the development and initial validation of a novel self-report resilience scale, which addresses gaps in the resilience measurement literature by assessing thoughts and behaviors that help promote resilience rather than traits, and simultaneously evaluating multiple factors previously associated with resilience.

Method: Following consensus meetings focused on scale development, we conducted an online study (n = 1,864) of U.S. adults to develop and validate an initial version of the Mount Sinai Resilience Scale (MSRS).

Results: An exploratory factor analysis in a random 50% of the sample suggested a seven-factor solution; this solution was then generally supported by a follow-up confirmatory factor analysis in the remaining 50% of the sample. After removing poor-fitting items, a revised 24-item scale correlated in the expected directions with established measures of perceived resilience and resilience-related constructs (e.g., social support and optimism).

Conclusions: Collectively, the results of this study provide initial support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the MSRS and describe its factor structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文本刊更多论文

西奈山复原力量表的编制和初步验证。

目的：心理复原力的构建在心理健康领域受到越来越多的关注。本文描述了一种新的自我报告复原力量表的开发和初步验证，该量表通过评估有助于促进复原力而非特质的思想和行为，并同时评估先前与复原力相关的多个因素，填补了复原力测量文献中的空白。方法：在专注于量表开发的共识会议之后，我们对美国成年人进行了一项在线研究（n=1864），以开发和验证西奈山复原力量表（MSRS）的初始版本。结果：对随机50%的样本进行探索性因素分析，提出了七因素解决方案；这一解决方案通常得到了对剩余50%样本进行的后续验证性因素分析的支持。在去除不匹配的项目后，修订后的24个项目量表在预期方向上与感知韧性和韧性相关结构（如社会支持和乐观主义）的既定衡量标准相关。结论：总之，本研究的结果为MSRS的收敛和判别有效性提供了初步支持，并描述了其因素结构。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2023 APA，保留所有权利）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Multiple-

CiteScore

11.20

自引率

3.20%

发文量

427

期刊介绍： Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence